Jujia recruitment

According to relevant media reports, a recruitment company in Changsha emphasized eleven long legs, fair skin and good looks. People will really feel angry when they see such news, because in their usual resumes, they can really see a person with a good image, good temperament, or dignified and generous appearance. In fact, this is understandable. After all, it's another company, and it still needs to be arranged. But the so-called good image, good temperament and dignified appearance actually refer to the general population, or people who are above the average population. However, it is the first time that the recruitment network directly mentioned eleven beautiful women with long legs and white skin, which will make many people feel offended.

Is this recruitment discriminatory?

In fact, this kind of behavior is already discriminatory and has been suspected of breaking the law. From a legal point of view, some employers? Wonderful? Regulations and requirements have been suspected of breaking the law. Generally speaking, any employment conditions that have nothing to do with the job content, such as quantity, region, constellation, figure, etc., will be considered as employment discrimination. Article 26 stipulates that when employing personnel and employment agencies to engage in employment intermediary activities, employers shall provide equal employment opportunities and fair employment conditions for workers, and there shall be no employment discrimination. China's labor law also clearly stipulates that workers are not discriminated against because of nationality, race, gender and religious belief. Women enjoy equal employment rights with men. Therefore, judging from this law, the company did have discriminatory behavior, which has already involved illegal behavior, and the circumstances are relatively bad.

Has the company made an explanation at present?

For this matter, the company made an explanation: it is said that this situation is only that the company's administration thinks fighting is fun, and the staff directly copy the recruitment requirements. In fact, there is no such requirement for normal recruitment. In fact, seeing this explanation feels unbelievable at all. You are a company, and you have the image of your own company, but you actually typed such extremely unpleasant words on the recruitment network. The final explanation is that I felt funny and accidentally hit it. Does this situation treat recruitment as a joke, or does it lack basic audit and respect for professionals?