A woman in Henan reported an incident in which her former mother-in-law ate an empty salary. The bank's response is not true. What problems have been exposed?

In fact, this incident exposed two big problems. On the one hand, there are big loopholes in the management of banks. On the other hand, the woman may have some secrets when reporting, which we don't know. Because after the bank responded, the woman asked a lot of questions, but the bank couldn't answer them in time, so I think it should be the bank's problem that will be bigger.

Before a woman in Henan reported that her mother-in-law was eating empty pay, I believe many people were screened by a recent report. It turned out that this woman's real name reported her former mother-in-law. I stayed in the bank for a long time, but I never had to go to work. Even my mother-in-law has many luxury cars and properties under her own name. As an ordinary bank clerk, how can she have so many famous cars and houses? She also questioned this. Because it is a real-name report, it quickly attracted the attention of relevant departments, and reporting on social platforms also caused heated discussion among many netizens.

According to this woman's report, this woman's former mother-in-law not only ate an empty salary, but even bought a house in the name of herself and her husband. Then I got myself into millions of debts. This house has nothing to do with me. Moreover, after she married her husband, her former mother-in-law told her about her marriage and all kinds of things, which eventually led to the breakdown of their marriage. Probably because her report is well-founded and can arouse everyone's * * *. Therefore, this matter quickly went on the social list, causing a lot of controversy and discussion.

First of all, it has always been considered a big deal for everyone to eat empty salaries. Because not everyone goes to work to make money, some people can get money without going to work, which actually makes people feel particularly unbalanced. It also includes public institutions like banks. If she only takes money and doesn't work, then her life can be said to be very moist, and the former mother-in-law's practice is really not clever. You just eat empty pay. You keep a low profile and don't do anything to hurt others, but your ex-mother-in-law also threatened to intimidate the woman who reported it.

Now with the continuous development of social media, real-name reporting has become a very favorable way for many people to ask for help. After the woman reported her ex-mother-in-law's real name, the relevant units immediately paid attention to this matter, and the banks involved also responded in time. It is said that the contents reported by this lady are not true. This former mother-in-law actually works in a bank, just her work address or something. Women are not sure. The bank originally thought it was a slap in the face. I didn't expect the bank's response, and netizens didn't buy it.

In the eyes of netizens, the bank's response is actually just a very fake response. There is no evidence that there is a strong counterattack against women's reports. For example, before the woman reported, her mother-in-law often didn't go to work and got paid every month. When the bank responded, it did not give an example that the former mother-in-law was at work, and there was no way to show the punch record or the proof of going to work, which made many netizens feel very unreliable.

What problems did the bank's response reveal? In fact, some employees in the banking system should be most affected by this report. Because it exposes a big problem. On the one hand, there are big loopholes in the management of banks. Everyone knows that public institutions are very good units, and it can be said that they are basically well-fed. Therefore, banks actually have many loopholes in the management of such institutions. Because there are indeed many people who can not go to work in public institutions by themselves. Moreover, there is no so-called punch card system in public institutions, so even if he doesn't come to work, the management above won't notice.

On the other hand, in fact, the bank's response exposed a big problem, that is, the response to these things did not provide very strong evidence. To put it another way, the response of banks is actually very weak. If the bank can provide very strong evidence against the woman's report, then netizens will not buy it. Therefore, although it can't be put on the table, in fact, this incident is likely to prove that the former mother-in-law really has the behavior of eating empty money.

In order to maintain its positive image, the bank made such a response. But nowadays, netizens are more resourceful. Don't just listen to the bank, because later the woman threw out several questions about the bank's memories, but the bank was speechless, which made everyone feel even more difficult. Therefore, banks still need to improve their internal systems in the management process.