I want to attend an interview for teacher recruitment, but I have never been engaged in similar teacher work. How should I introduce myself?

Self-cognition is a very important problem type in teaching and recruitment structure. The main purpose of the test is to understand the basic personal situation and information of the candidates and what kind of people the candidates are, so as to test the matching degree between the test individuals and the teachers' positions. Students who have learned about it must know that the core of this kind of question lies in the "matching between people and posts", that is, around the characteristics of teachers' posts, but it is difficult to answer this kind of question because there is no law to follow. Introduce several skills of self-introduction:

1, see the big from the small.

For example, please talk about one thing that you are most proud of.

A very simple way to ask questions is to understand the personality characteristics of candidates by describing an experience. When you answer, everyone will think of your grades and think that your grades are proud. For example, "I won the first place in the school speech contest." Or "I once accepted a strict substitute assignment." Wait, I hope to win the favor of the examiner with my actual results. This is indeed a very effective method and convincing, but a considerable number of candidates may lack such experience and achievements. Therefore, we can adopt the method of "seeing the big from the small", for example, "My proudest thing is that at the end of the educational practice, my classmates said thank you to me in unison, and their recognition is my greatest pride." Such a small detail may be felt by the whole person, and it can also show that candidates attach importance to the construction of teacher-student relationship, realize the value of teaching and educating people, embody the value of student-oriented, and win the favor of examiners.

2, want to rise first.

Example: Tell me your most embarrassing thing.

This kind of problem makes all candidates unprepared in the examination room, thinking that the examiner is going to "expose the shortcomings", so they choose to consciously avoid the examiner or pick something irrelevant to prevaricate the examiner. In fact, all the candidates can't understand the intention of the topic. The topic should not focus on "What is embarrassment", but on "How did you solve it?" Thinking from this level, if we want to solve the embarrassment, we should focus on how to solve it on the premise of objectively expressing the embarrassing incident. For example, "as a Chinese teacher, my most embarrassing thing is to write a basic one-character stroke on the blackboard in class." At that time, I was pointed out by my classmates in class, and my classmates were talking about it. I immediately realized that I had made a mistake that I shouldn't have made. " Later, I will focus on how to solve the embarrassment through teaching wit and reflection afterwards, and what kind of tips I can give myself. This kind of answer not only reflects certain authenticity, but also objectively shows the quality of candidates' error correction and the embodiment of teaching wit.

3, flashback, set suspense

Example: Why did you choose the profession of teacher?

When answering questions, most candidates have a common problem, that is, it is difficult to attract the attention of the listener. For example, in this example, most people will simply say, "The first reason why I chose the position of teacher is ... and the second reason is ...". At this time, flashbacks can be used to set suspense, such as: "Examiner, the reason why I chose a teacher stems from a misunderstanding of the profession of teachers ..." Such an answer can enable the examiner to start with the "misunderstanding" and follow the candidates' ideas and listen carefully to what the misunderstanding is, why I misunderstood it and why I chose the profession of teachers. So you can try to change the straightforward narrative in the past in this way.