Debate contest: Should teachers be stricter or more lenient with students? Urgent! As a teacher, I should be strict with my students.

Loose management does more harm than good to college students.

Wenchao He

Hello everyone!

2 1 century is the era of human nature! (Heavy tone, confident expression, pause) Ladies and gentlemen, this is true. Attaching importance to, respecting, shaping and developing people has become the spirit of civilized society and the basic concept of modern management. It can be said that humanized management has been widely implemented in our society. There are two modes, namely, loose mode and strict mode, and both modes can realize humanized management. But just now, the other debater seems to have confused some affiliation, which really makes us feel very sorry!

What is management? In layman's terms, it means planning, organizing, leading and controlling.

Loose management is a management mode with less control and more freedom, which allows managers and managed people to consciously act according to their wishes at that time in order to achieve organizational goals.

Strict management is a rigorous, prudent, serious and rational management method in planning, organization, leadership and control, which can make all members of the organization strictly abide by the regulations and achieve organizational goals.

Our view is that loose management does more harm than good to college students. Why do you say that?

First of all, from the social phenomenon, the loose management of government agencies makes it impossible to achieve the "two improvements" and "three growth" stipulated in the Education Law of the People's Republic of China. In 2003, the proportion of education funds in GDP did not increase, but decreased by 0.04% compared with 2002, and various arbitrary charges emerged one after another. The loose management of the judicial department leads to gender discrimination or recruitment fraud in some companies when recruiting college students; Loose school management leads to some teachers not preparing lessons, being late for class and so on.

From the ethical point of view, the implementation of loose management is a good thing for talents with strong self-control, but it is a great sorrow for vulnerable groups with poor self-control and strong dependence. The vicious circle that the stronger the strong, the weaker the weak, does not conform to the basic ethical norms of "protecting the vulnerable groups" in civilized society. For college students, the decline of vulnerable groups indicates the abandonment of university functions!

Generally speaking, the essence of management is the pursuit of efficiency. Strict management is more conducive to the efficient realization of management objectives. It not only constantly monitors whether the executors are working together to get close to the management objectives in Qi Xin, but also makes necessary corrections at any time. We can fully protect the rights and interests of our students from the social, collective and individual perspectives! On the contrary, loose management, its freedom and ease can not effectively guarantee the effective implementation of management functions at all levels. Originally, all kinds of management in our society tend to be humanized, which is a good thing, but it is precisely because loose management has its inevitable disadvantages-it depends on the consciousness of the executors, so the original intention of good management is ultimately impossible to achieve!

So we firmly believe that loose management does more harm than good to college students!

Some important concepts in attachment theory;

Loose and relaxed; Less control, more freedom.

Strictly abide by the system or master the standards.

Loose and loose are a state and relative, as far as content is concerned; Loose style is a pattern, which is fixed, in terms of form.

Humanized management attaches importance to the management of human existence as human beings. Respect human nature, guide and shape behavior, manage by habit, pay attention to people's creativity and promote development by innovation.

The function of a university is to cultivate talents, develop science and technology and serve the society.

In 2003, the proportion of education funds to GDP was only 3.28%, which was 0.04 percentage points lower than that of 3.32% in 2002. 1993 The Outline of Education Reform and Development in China promulgated by the government clearly stipulates: "Gradually increase the proportion of national financial education expenditure in the gross national product, reaching 4% by the end of this century".

Benefit, efficiency and income. Loose management gives managers and managed people a goal, hoping that they will consciously move closer to the goal; Strict management also gives managers and managed people a goal, but urging and supervising all management objects must be close to the goal, otherwise they should be corrected in time. Obviously, the benefit of the latter is higher than that of the former!

Strategies to solve the problem:

1, "loose management" refers to the implementation of this management method in various fields of society, which is harmful to the self-development of college students. Not "college students slack off management"! ! ! We should expand the slack management as much as possible. For example, for teachers to slack off management, teachers are late for class and do not prepare lessons; The lax management of state government departments, failure to abide by laws and lax law enforcement have led to corruption and hindered the continuous support for higher education. One of the "three improvements" stipulated in the education law is that the state increases the proportion of education funds to GDP year by year, but it actually decreased last year, which is illegal for the state; The lax management of the social employment market leads to students being cheated when they work part-time, and being discriminated against when they apply for jobs after graduation (such as discriminating against women and short people), but they can't get help from relevant departments! ……

Task: list examples of "loose management" in other aspects and find out cases with specific names, times and events. A special look at the materials recently promulgated by the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China to maintain party member's advanced nature and fight corruption shows that the CPC Central Committee is determined to abandon loose management.

2. Management authority henri fayol pointed out that management includes five functions: planning, organizing, directing, coordinating and controlling. (Later, Steven Robbins revised it to: planning, organizing, leading and controlling) "Loose management" means making as few restrictions as possible in these five aspects, so that managers and managed people can play as much as possible according to their own wishes. The elements of management include management subject, management object, management process, management goal and management environment. "Loose management" means keeping these five elements in their original state as much as possible regardless of the guidance and influence of external forces.

Task: Find or design examples of how these five functions and five elements have negative effects under relaxed conditions, and simplify them.

3, we insist on strict management to produce benefits, that is to say, we must strictly implement various management activities, even if it is a humanized management measure, it must also be strictly implemented. For example, the school originally stipulated that 1 1 should be cut off at half past one, but it was changed and the power was cut off continuously. This is a humanized rule. However, if it is "loosely managed", the dormitory may be opened if it is in a bad mood, and it will not be opened if it is in a good mood. Anyway, management is loose, and it is easy for the subject and object of management to act according to their own wishes. If the students are not satisfied, they can DIY and refit the electric meter themselves.

Task: Find out the relevant information of the famous training course "Winning in Execution" and demonstrate the necessity of "strict execution" and the harm of lax management. Besides, I'm thinking of some related examples.

4. Our adherence to loose management does not mean humanized management or people-oriented.

Task: Our strategy is to describe humanized management as universal management in 2 1 century. It is an advanced management concept and can be realized in two ways. In other words, to discuss our debate today on the premise of human nature, no matter which side agrees with this view. Please find relevant materials to demonstrate this view and give examples.

5. It is of philosophical significance that we insist on strict management, which is a necessary prerequisite for the development of everything, and this philosophical significance plays a great role in the formation of college students' world outlook, outlook on life and values!

Task: Search related philosophy books (history of philosophy), extract relevant expositions of ancient and modern Chinese and foreign philosophers, and demonstrate this view.

Moderator (Su Hongbo): Hello, teachers. With the development of quality education, people are more and more aware of the importance of educational ideas. It can be said that as long as there is educational behavior, there must be educational ideas at work. However, some people are clear, while others are vague. There is also a good debate about whether to treat students strictly or leniently. So when educating students, is it more important to be strict with the law or to be tolerant of life? Today, we invited eight teachers from our school to have a debate on "which is more important, strictness or looseness?", hoping to bring more thoughts to everyone.

Let's introduce the people sitting on the left side of the big screen in this debate. Their point of view is that it is more important for teachers to be strict than loose in educating students. Sitting on the right side of the big screen is the opponent. Their view is that it is more important for teachers to combine leniency with severity when educating students. Welcome them. Let me introduce the rules of the competition: there are three links in this competition:

The first link is the demonstration stage. The debate between the pros and cons showed our own views. Each person will speak for no more than three minutes.

The second link is free debate. The pros and cons are free to debate and express their opinions. Tell each other your reasons. Each person's speech shall not exceed 1 minute, with a total time of 9 minutes.

Finally, the two sides summarized the four debates and re-emphasized their respective views. Each person will speak for no more than three minutes. Let's start the debate. Please welcome the square host (Zhao Tingting) and another debater:

Hello, everyone. Our view is that modern education cannot be separated from strictness. As the saying goes, "No rules, no Fiona Fang" is a strict requirement for students. Without strict requirements, it is irresponsible for students to let themselves go. Strict education is a traditional education in China. Although its historical development has undergone great changes, it is still an excellent educational method suitable for modern education in China. Strict education is strict not only in teaching but also in management. At all times and in all countries, many famous universities regard strictness as the foundation of running a school. Today's world-class universities such as Oxford, Harvard, Peking University and Tsinghua all aim at rigorous scholarship. From ancient times to the present, there are many young people with backbone and ambition, and their growth and success are condensed with the hard work and sweat of Yan Shi. And the list goes on. No matter who is asked who is the most unforgettable teacher when a teenager is studying, most people will answer: the teacher who is most strict with me is the most unforgettable, because the teacher's strictness to me is his concern and love for me. Without the strictness of the teacher, I would not have achieved what I have achieved today. Strict education is the key and necessary factor for the growth and success of teenagers. "Spoil children like killing them" applies to family education as well as school education. After all, primary school students are still young, have poor self-control ability, have little social experience and lack the ability to distinguish right from wrong. If we rely solely on incentive education and appreciation education, the effect is not obvious, and strict education must be the main educational means. Today's students are not lack of communication, motivation or appreciation, but lack of strict education. Strict education does not mean that teachers abuse power over students, nor does it mean that teachers do not respect students' personality. A teacher should not only have rich knowledge and be good at imparting knowledge, but also be good at strictly educating students on how to behave, and set strict requirements for students with his words and deeds and set an example for them. Such a teacher is responsible, and it is the embodiment of respecting students' personality and caring for their growth. In a word, the advanced era and the development of education cannot be separated from strict education. Moderator: Let's invite the opposing party to demonstrate. The opposing party (Zhao Changmei) is the moderator and the opposing debater:

Hello, everyone. Our view is that leniency is more important than strictness when teachers educate students. Psychological research shows that in the absence of mental pressure and psychological burden, students' cerebral cortex is easy to form an excitation center, activate the nervous system, and make psychological activities such as perception, attention, memory and imagination in a positive state. In other words, the formation of primary school students' innovative consciousness especially needs a relaxed and harmonious environment. If students fidget in class, it is impossible to generate sparks and motivation for innovation. Therefore, we should create a relaxed teaching environment in teaching. Allow students to make mistakes. The book Revolution of Learning holds that "real learning should create a relaxed atmosphere." In teaching, our first task should be how to create a democratic and relaxed teaching atmosphere. In class, if teachers concentrate on speaking, any question will be final, and it is hard to believe that such a class will be welcomed by students by guiding students' ideas to the so-called correct answers. Because all teachers' classroom efforts are to match the answers. In order to approach the standard, it is obvious that the teaching atmosphere is dignified and the teaching method is stiff. In the long run, students will inevitably lose their interest and motivation in learning words. Teaching and educating people means imparting knowledge and guiding the soul. It has been an easy job since ancient times. Today, with the more advanced technology and smooth information, the requirements for teachers' cultural skills, knowledge updating and classroom art are getting higher and higher. In addition to classroom teaching and homework correction, teachers should also learn to have relaxed extracurricular time. For example, besides attending classes, Chinese teachers should also have time to read newspapers, surf the Internet and look up information. Only in this way can we better understand and guide students. Moderator: OK, let's enter the stage of free debate: Zhang Hong, the other debater, said it very well. Our first task should be how to create a relaxed teaching atmosphere. However, to create a democratic and relaxed learning atmosphere for students, we must have discipline. Otherwise, some children are free and relaxed, and some children may lose their free and relaxed learning environment. If a child is allowed to study freely in the classroom in the way he likes, he is really satisfied, but what about other children? Therefore, it is impossible for us not to be strict with children. In addition, it should be noted that the so-called strictness does not mean being harsh, rigid and opinionated, but proceeding from the fundamental interests of students, educating and guiding students' bad thoughts and behavior tendencies correctly and strictly.

On the other hand (Zhang), I think the debater on the other side confuses leniency and laissez-faire, leniency is different from laissez-faire, and even more different from indulgence. He had to lift blockades, bans, restrictions and so on. In other words, the so-called slack management is not to let students indulge themselves and run amok, but to give students a relatively relaxed environment so that their personalities can be released and displayed. In this sense, of course, for students, the advantages of slack management outweigh the disadvantages.

Founder (zhangyan) argues that the other party is relatively relaxed, indicating that there should be a degree of relaxation. For example, our "school day routine requirements" and "class convention" are to let students know what they can't do and what they can't say, and to regulate students' words and deeds under certain discipline with tangible and specific regulations. The so-called "no rules, no Fiona Fang" is the truth. Therefore, education and teaching should be strict. On the other hand (Zhao Changmei), Lao Tzu said: "People should follow the land, the land should follow the sky, the day should be by the way, and the road should follow nature." Everything must conform to the development of nature, and human growth must also conform to nature. Founder (Zhao Tingting) Isn't the familiar Fang Zhongyong a person who naturally grew up in a relaxed environment? What about his results? Is it only his fault that Zhong Yong has accomplished nothing? His teachers and parents didn't give him strict education on his acquired growth, which led to his education failure. This is a great pity. Ask the other friend, if liberal arts education is conducive to people's success, then what happened to Zhong Yong? He is so clever, why didn't he succeed?

Of course, everyone knows the story of the other person's injury, but this example alone is not enough to illustrate the other debater's point of view. On the contrary, the stories of Newton, Edison and Einstein must be familiar to everyone. They didn't give full play to their talents under the strict management of the school, but they gave full play to their talents after class in such a relaxed environment and finally succeeded. I think the other debater should think about the correctness of his point of view. Founder (Hu Qianqian) asked another debater not to take a case as a whole! In ancient China, it was famous for its strict management of schools. Today's world-class universities such as Oxford, Harvard, Peking University and Tsinghua all aim at rigorous scholarship. These famous schools have strict teaching system and management system, and also set up incentive mechanism, and also advocate incentive education and appreciation education in teaching. However, strict education still dominates education. It is precisely because these famous universities have a complete and strict teaching and management system that they have trained many scientists, politicians and artists for all countries in the world, made great contributions to the cause of talents in the world, and made their "famous brands" name last forever, which has been admired by generations of students. When Qu Min talks about first-class universities such as Harvard, he should talk about their admission systems. They never use a rigid written test to decide the admission qualification of candidates. Their interviews are varied. For example, the interview question at Trinity College in Cambridge is, why do you look in the mirror upside down instead of up and down? This fully reflects the relaxed admission standards of prestigious schools.

With regard to the education system, Zheng Fang (Hu Qianqian) can formulate a strict teaching system and a strict management system with its own characteristics according to its actual situation. Students in school can only complete their studies according to the rules and regulations of the school, otherwise they can't graduate. Once a student violates the school rules, he will be dealt with mercilessly according to the regulations.

The opponent (Qu Min) mentioned the strictness of study. I want to give an example. There is a best-selling book "Little Doudou by the Window", which tells the story of Xiao Doudou who was dismissed from school in the first grade because he could not adapt to the strict management system. Doudou's mother transferred her children to Ba Xueyuan, where Doudou's nature was brought into full play. In the end, she became a famous Japanese host and became the most child-friendly person among United Nations officials. This is Tetsuko Kuroyanagi. Founder (Zhang Hong) gave the debater a small Japanese example. Let's take Japan as an example: loose education originated in Japan in the 1970s, when the content of Japan was to reduce class hours and increase extracurricular time. According to the research report of UNESCO in 2004, Japanese primary and secondary school students are facing the problem of declining learning ability, and loose education is the most direct reason. Since then, Japan's liberal education for nearly 30 years has been opposed by the whole people. How do other debaters explain this? How can the success of a small Doudou be compared with the development of a nation?

Oppose (Wang Jingwen) that Japanese education cannot represent the education of the whole world. The loose management of students is not only a problem of students' personal growth environment, but also a key to the future and destiny of the whole society and country. The Ministry of Education has repeatedly emphasized the educational concept of "people-oriented, student-oriented". What is "student-oriented"? Is it "student-centered" to restrict students everywhere and stifle their personality development? Is it possible to train compound talents for the society by locking up students and educating them according to a model? Founder (zhangyan) may be due to the one-sided emphasis on appreciation, respect and people-oriented education in recent years. Schools and families have formed abnormal protection for children, which has made children have unhealthy cognitive psychology and become more and more difficult to manage. Some schools indulge children blindly and regard strict requirements for children as a contradiction with the concept of new curriculum reform. Teachers simply dare not take care of children when they make mistakes, so the so-called uncritical education appears. I went to the other extreme of education-indulging children. Therefore, if children are not strictly required, appreciation and encouragement education will not achieve the expected results, and even go to the opposite side. The opposing party (Wang Jingwen) asks the defense friend of the opposing party to pay attention to your point of view, which is the result of one-sided emphasis on "people-oriented", while we are pursuing a comprehensive "people-oriented" approach. ……

Moderator (Interrupted): Time is up. Opposing debaters are inseparable from each other. Now, enter the stage of concluding remarks (Zhao Tingting): Hello, hosts and debaters! Our view is that modern education cannot be separated from strictness! There is an old saying in China: "A strict teacher makes a good apprentice". Only strict education can achieve the social goal of education, cultivate high-quality students and better reflect the great significance of education to society. In school education, there is no doubt that it is necessary to strictly demand students. This is because this is not only the requirement of society for education, but also the hope of students and parents for education. The survey results show that 100% students' parents are willing to choose schools and class teachers who are strict with their students, and 98.3% students' wishes are consistent with their parents'. In learning, creating a free and relaxed learning atmosphere for children does not mean that strict management can be abandoned and discipline must be used to restrain them. Otherwise, some children may lose their free and relaxed learning environment. In moral education, it is precisely because of the blind connivance of some teachers and parents that some children go astray. After all, children are children, and children's concepts of right and wrong, rational thinking and judgment can only be comprehensive with age and rich knowledge. In the process of children's growth, if they are not strict, they are in danger of going astray at any time, so strict requirements have special significance for growing children. The education of students' behavior habits has existed since ancient times, such as "preventing micro-duration" and "don't do it with small evils, don't do it with small goodness". As teachers, can we turn a blind eye to these behaviors of students? At present, social development is in a period when social moral standards collide with China traditional culture and western culture. The western life style and teaching mode that can't be worshipped blindly don't conform to the national conditions of China and China. Innovative education is of great significance to a country and a nation. Like quality education, innovative education emphasizes the development of students' personality, fluency and uniqueness of thinking. But it is inseparable from rich knowledge accumulation, rigorous academic spirit and thinking training, so it is inseparable from strict requirements. Children are strictly required to be scientific, systematic and continuous, and schools and parents should unify standards. Can't be strict at school and loose at home; The teacher is strict and the parents are loose; Strict parents loosen ancestors. In the specific operation, we should set facts, reason, set an example, criticize and educate, and use disciplinary measures moderately within the scope permitted by law, which is also conducive to strict demands on children.

To sum up, "strictness" is the magic weapon of education. Only by grasping the "strictness" criterion can educators exert their greater potential and cultivate new era construction talents with individuality and innovative spirit. Finally, I reiterate my view that modern education cannot be separated from strictness!

(Qu Min) Summary statement of the opposing side: Moderator, debater of the opposing side, I want to sum up with a story: there was a boy who was studying in a medical school. He was not interested in medicine, but he was fascinated by computers. Before it was opened, the headmaster of this school knew how to implement loose management for students and let their potential be brought into play. So, he supported the boy from all aspects, and asked him to buy the IBM personal computer with reduced price from the retailer at that time and sell it to his classmates after the dormitory was modified and upgraded. This kind of computer is so popular that major companies buy it one after another. At the age of 23, he set up his own company with180,000 dollars. Ten years later, he created a myth similar to Bill Gates, with assets of $4.3 billion. He is michael dell, president of Dell Company in the United States. Dell's success has created a myth in the computer world, and ultimately benefited from open management. Imagine that if it weren't for the loose management of the principal at that time, Dell might still be an ordinary doctor, but the computer world has lost a master and genius. 2 1 century What is the most expensive? Talent! Only by implementing loose management and giving students relatively free space to enrich themselves and exercise themselves can we cultivate high-quality talents. Every student has a black box full of flames hidden in his body. Only by loose management can we find the key to open this black box, let it release the greatest light of life, let this light illuminate every student's life path, and let China college students strut and walk in the forefront of the times with excellent ability and first-class quality! Therefore, for students, it is an indisputable fact that the advantages of slack management outweigh the disadvantages. Moderator: Both sides are really angry and bring us a lot of thoughts. I think of a sentence in Wonderful and Terrible: "Wonderful" or "Terrible". These two extreme arguments have the same starting point-that is love. Encouraged by love, I struggled forward. American playwright bud. It is with this harmonious fatherly love and maternal love that Schulberg finally embarked on the road of being a writer. I hope our teachers can coordinate the relationship between strictness and looseness in their work and cultivate more talents with your's love.

See for yourself. You can change it. It is very practical at any stage.