Now some community owners want to cancel property management and change to community escrow. what do you think?

I have already said this question. Without property, there will be no good people in property. Many people have suggested that it is really reasonable to crack down on real estate. Let's see what their nature is. It is urgent to cancel the property.

Property is to spend money to find hooligans to manage themselves. Actually, you don't need property at all. Set up your own management Committee and take turns cleaning it yourself. According to the identification system at the gate, people in the community are not allowed to go in. Isn't that simple? We can save a lot of management fees every year without asking for trouble.

It's not a local property, it's the same all over the country. Can you be safe with property? Insider theft often happens. Most property companies have low quality and simply don't know what service is. They mistakenly think that they are the management owners, and everyone must obey. In many cases, they will also overcharge property fees. It's normal to beat and scold the owners. They always shut you out and seldom pay attention to beating you up. What reason do we have to spend money to suffer?

Many people don't understand and say that you are busy and have no time to clean. You can switch shifts with others. Older people are responsible for guarding the gate, making more efforts and helping to serve. It's the end of the year, and everyone will be a little interesting. It is reported that an old man volunteered to clean his son's community, 15, and didn't get a penny. What spirit is this? In fact, many old people are really bored. Cleaning and activities are also good. Thank you.

You shouldn't have had real estate in the first place. Isn't that a burden to yourself? Many things in a community are particularly easy to communicate, so just sit down and have a good talk. It is best to evict the property and manage it yourself.

Property is a cancer. ...

Why?

Real estate is profitable. Several property companies open accounts and earn legitimate profits. ..

Very few. They all treat their owners like pigs. They suck blood like crazy. ..

How many owners know that the income from parking spaces belongs to the owners.

How many people know the annual advertising cost of an elevator?

How many owners know that the property secretly takes maintenance kickbacks? ...

How many members of the industry Committee wear a pair of pants with the property?

How many properties have their own relocation? Negotiate a big rebate with the door and window manufacturer, so that you can set up a place to install doors and windows.

Good performance is not excluded. But those are really few.

Real estate is profitable. Don't expect others to accept 100. Then they will earn you 15% ... that is, 15 yuan ... a good property can pay 50 yuan. ...

I really don't know what the above thinks ... Grandpa Mao said to come from the masses and go to the masses ... I don't know what the people want. ....

Ordinary people want me to pay as much as they want. How much it costs is clear. Take what you earned. Don't touch what you shouldn't earn. Serve the owners well. The eyes of the masses are discerning.

Support the community escrow, cancel the property and reduce the burden on the owners!

In fact, the owners only need to solve the problems in the community: 1. Ask someone to clean the courtyard and corridor, or you can take turns cleaning it yourself; 2. Outsourcing elevator maintenance, and outsourcing the original property; 3. Domestic garbage (municipal sanitation company). 4. Water: The water supply company supplies qualified water to the household water meter (this is what the water supply company must do to collect water charges) 5. Electricity.

The courtyard walls of residential houses are the remains of China's farming society. Modern society only plays the role of psychological security and comfort, and has little effect. It used to take a few steps to get home, but now it's very inconvenient to take a big detour.

It is suggested that the courtyard wall should not be designed in the future, and the pedestrian walkway should be gradually dismantled or opened to facilitate access.

Now some community owners want to cancel property management and change to community escrow. what do you think?

Now the property management of urban residential areas is really not in place, so the owners have great opinions on setting up owners' committees to supervise the property. What is the main reason? First: the property management of residential areas within the jurisdiction is not in place, mainly the first. Environmental sanitation, community dogs don't care about these pet dogs when they pull feces. Second. The public security management in the community is also poor, and no one cares about the takeaway and does not register. Third: the annual advertising revenue in the community is not announced, and it is basically taken by itself and not returned to the owners. Fourth, the parking fee of the community is not published and opaque. How much overhaul fund used was not disclosed anywhere, which is why the property management was cancelled.

The purpose of property establishment is to improve people's lives, produce water and improve the living environment. At present, judging from the property discovery, there are indeed some properties (mainly commercial and high-end gourmet properties) that have played a role, but! Property mostly stays in collecting property fees, providing low-cost and high-quality services, and earning the difference between labor, management and service to make a profit. In the current situation of high housing prices and rapid expansion of urbanization, it will be difficult to ban real estate (self-control) for a while, and it will shake some people's cheese! Touch some vested interests! In recent years, the cases of property disputes have constantly erupted, presenting the bloody side of this industry to the working people, and property has become one of the mountains that are pressing on people in the new era. As long as we always firmly follow the party, I believe that in the near future, property will eventually be uprooted!

Very good! The community has resources, police, judicial mediation organizations and the ability to cooperate with relevant law enforcement departments. It can effectively control the phenomenon of illegal buildings, random construction and vegetable planting in the community, effectively control the behavior of some people changing houses without authorization, and greatly reduce the contradiction between owners and property management service enterprises. Community is the grass-roots organization of the party, and the salary of cadres is very low, so it also increases the strength of grass-roots organizations, better serves the residents of the whole community and increases the communication between residents and the community. Nowadays, property management service enterprises, regardless of the service of the community, just collect money, and do whatever it takes to get the money, such as power failure, water cut-off, gas cut-off, elevator outage, threats from black society and so on. , or sue the owner in court. These means have caused the contradiction between the owners and the property management service enterprises to intensify and the contradictions and disputes to become more prominent. There are cases all over the country. How to eliminate these contradictions requires more scientific design, management, operation and service, and how to better serve this class is worth thinking about.

Let me talk about my personal opinion. 1, if the community is old, it is suggested to set up an owners' committee, because if the old community lets the property settle in for management, the property will be thankless and will definitely make ends meet, so there will be poor management and inaction. Of course, it is not that the property is not good. After all, there are many problems in the old community, and the property can't be solved. Even if the property can be solved, there is no extra money.

2. It is unfair to let the property of the newly-built residential area or the property company of the original developer improve the service quality and raise the recruitment threshold. As long as the service quality and personnel quality are improved, there will not be too many problems. Of course, it is unfair to impose something that is not within the scope of property. Of course, the relative cost of improving service quality and personnel quality will also increase, but I think everyone will accept it as long as it is not excessive. After all, everyone wants to live in a clean and tidy place.

The above personal views are not inclined to which side.

Property is everyone's business and should not be a commercial activity. Street management should be the responsibility of the neighborhood Committee, and the source of expenses is tax, which comes from the people and is used by the people. Water, electricity, gas, heating, sanitation, greening, fire protection and public security are all responsible. Housing maintenance is the responsibility of the construction unit, and commercial housing maintenance is the responsibility of the developer. Stay away from property and let people live and work in peace and contentment. Stay away from property, reduce social contradictions and reduce residents' antipathy to the country!

Property is everyone's business and should not be a commercial activity. Street management should be the responsibility of the neighborhood Committee, and the source of expenses is tax, which comes from the people and is used by the people. Water, electricity, gas, heating, sanitation, greening, fire protection and public security are all responsible. Housing maintenance is the responsibility of the construction unit, and commercial housing maintenance is the responsibility of the developer. Stay away from property and let people live and work in peace and contentment. Stay away from property, reduce social contradictions and reduce residents' antipathy to the country!

Personally, I am the owner and have been engaged in community service. I know a little about these, so let me talk about my personal opinion.

First, the source of the contradiction between the owner and the property. Property is a commercial service organization, and its nature does not meet the business needs. What the owner needs is a housekeeper who can do a good job, but the property only regards service as a job that should be done well, and business is the essence of the property company.

The charging standard of property companies is not the market price, but the government-guided price, which limits the enthusiasm of property companies for service. In order to maintain the operation of the company, property companies have to find various sources to reduce costs and increase income.

This has led to the fundamental inconsistency between property services and owners' needs.

Second, the possession and use of community public resources.

All the resources in the community belong to the owner, but the property has the right to manage the public resources. Most importantly, the profits of public resources eventually entered the pockets of property companies, but they were not reflected in the improvement of property services and the offset of property fees by owners. This is actually the essential contradiction between the landlord and the second landlord.

Third, finally talk about the views on community self-management.

Objectively speaking, the community needs property services, otherwise it needs a community that can represent the interests of the owners and has strong organizational and management capabilities. Therefore, community self-management is feasible in theory, but it is actually a question of who will manage, how to manage and what to manage.

First of all, who will manage, community self-governing organizations, such as owners' committees. It is the embodiment of the owner being the master of the country;

Secondly, whatever, build a platform for community service, collect community service fees, evaluate and supervise community service providers, and be a good housekeeper;

Again, how to manage?

1, set up a community service platform, which allows the owners to speak, communicate and maintain. ;

2. Establish an evaluation management system for community service providers, and evaluate enterprises entering community service, including property evaluation and supervision. , and according to the quality of service, the service fee is settled regularly.

3. Community autonomous organizations recruit suppliers-evaluate supplier services-service settlement.

To sum up, the main contradiction between community self-management and property management is that the distribution mechanism of responsibilities and rights does not match. As long as it is straightened out, both the self-management of the community and the property management can achieve good results.

For local governments, resolutely safeguard the central anti-corruption decision, crack down on cliques, and play an umbrella.

For big cities, they just want transparent property, and the delivery fee and property service fee are acceptable to everyone.

High-income properties take water and electricity to control the residents of the community, and emerge in an endless stream. What price bureau and property management office of the Housing Authority dare to bully you with water and electricity, and basically fail to buy it off?

More black and white attributes have to be handled by relevant departments. Otherwise, the pressure of ordinary people from the property will be great, how can they live?