Debate: Debate words that cooperation is conducive to personal development Urgent! ! !

On competition in modern society is greater than cooperation

In modern society, whether collectively or individually, competition and cooperation are ongoing. We can cooperate for the common interests, and also People can compete for different interests. In short, competition and cooperation are everywhere, and with the advancement of globalization, there are more opportunities for competition and cooperation. In modern society, is there more competition than cooperation or more cooperation than competition? ?

I think there is more competition than cooperation.

Competition is the eternal driving force for the survival and development of a country and a nation. If a country or a nation does not have competition, there will be no progress or development. If a person does not have the pressure of competition, he will not have the motivation to move forward. Today's world, today's society is a competitive world, a competitive society. The market economy is an economy of competition, and the core and basic principle of the market economy is competition.

Competition in its connotation refers to the competition, competition, or participation in public competitions between people for their own interests. The result of competition is survival of the fittest. That is, the superior wins and the inferior loses; the winner gains and the loser loses. As Darwin's theory of biological evolution says: "The fittest survive and the unfit are eliminated." It can be seen that competition is a contest of strength. The strong survive and develop, while the weak are eliminated or perish; competition is also a contest of wisdom. The talented will win, the mediocre will fail. In real life, competition is everywhere and all the time. For example, plants compete for sunlight, water, and nutrients; animals compete for territory, mates, and food; companies compete for raw materials; they compete for markets, and sales.

From the perspective of our campus, the selection of class cadres is the best example of competition. The class teacher will select good students with both good character and academic performance to serve as class cadres, which promotes competition to a certain extent. There is also competition among students. The amount of bonuses is linked to the average score of each class. Those with higher scores will get more bonuses, and those with lower scores will get less bonuses. This undoubtedly creates competition. If you want to enter universities like Tsinghua and Peking University, you must In competition, those with higher scores gain, and those with lower scores lose. The current employment problem also clearly reflects competition. Data shows that from 1999 to the present, colleges and universities across the country have expanded enrollment for four consecutive years. In 1998, the number of enrollment in colleges and universities nationwide was 1.08 million. In 2002, the number of students enrolled reached 2.75 million. In four years, the enrollment scale of colleges and universities expanded by 1.6 times. This undoubtedly puts more employment pressure on the society. Where will these students work after graduation? With unlimited jobs, employers can only use the competition system to select the best personnel.

In particular, market competition is not only ubiquitous, but also inevitably fierce and cruel. If an enterprise or a unit can win the competition, it can survive and develop; on the contrary, if it loses the competition, it will go bankrupt.

The president of Qingdao Jianchenghao Wood Industry Co., Ltd. said that our company's leading products include two series of sanding machines and paint spraying lines, with nearly a hundred specifications and varieties. The sales network covers the whole country and is exported to domestic and foreign countries and Southeast Asia. Our products have passed ISO9001:2000 international quality system certification. A strong sense of market competition keeps us at the forefront of leading technology, and competition is the source of our motivation.

Since China joined the WTO in 2002, domestic competition has become more intense. The first affected The main ones are the telecommunications and financial industries. China's entry into the WTO will have a greater impact on China Telecom.

If there is no competition, the telecommunications industry will face a difficult situation. Competition will improve service quality, transform operating mechanisms, and reduce operating costs. Under the impact of the international telecommunications industry, competition is necessary if you want to survive. People's Bank of China Finance Expert Qin Chijiang believes that after joining the WTO and international financial institutions entering the Chinese market, China's financial industry is facing greater pressure than before, and competition is inevitable. Medical institutions have also been greatly affected after China joined the WTO. Medical services The further opening of the market will bring new opportunities and challenges to the reform and development of the health field. Competition has become a new topic in the medical industry. Only competition can adapt to the development of social trends.

"Things follow the rules of nature." "Survival of the fittest" indicates that competition can lead to the survival of the strong, leading to the continuous progress and development of society.

Around us, media competition is intensifying, including radio wars, newspaper wars, periodical wars, and cross-regional wars. Competition, cross-media competition...

The program "Super Girl", which was once popular in China, is lively, full of passion, and full of fierce competition. Every link must be strictly screened. The final victory is all revealed in the atmosphere of competition.

From January 14th to 21st this year, the "Two Sessions" held in Beijing became a battlefield for media news from all walks of life. To stand out from the numerous media , it is necessary to serve up a wonderful "news feast" to readers.

Every media wants to get the maximum ratings, and competition is inevitable.

In the NBA, competition has become the only way to select a team. What the players are doing exhausted is to compete with their opponents. Fight to win or lose, and compete. The 2008 Olympic Games to be held in Beijing, China, has many competitions, but none of the trophies are won through competition.

In order to cooperate With the Olympic Games going smoothly, the Beijing Olympic Organizing Committee *** put out 180 positions for open recruitment at home and abroad. After qualification review, *** 3,307 people took the exam, of which 1,368 people had a graduate degree or above, accounting for 41.4%, 863 people with overseas study experience, accounting for 26.1%; 3,062 people under the age of 35, accounting for 92.6%; 1,768 candidates from Beijing, accounting for 53.5%, and 1,539 candidates from other regions, accounting for 46.5%. Beijing The relevant person in charge of the Olympic Organizing Committee said that 3,307 people compete for 180 positions. The competition is inevitable and very fierce. Only competition is the final solution. Only competition can discover talents, and only competition can make progress.

The changes in Chinese dynasties and cultures are the product of class struggle. Class struggle is the creation of a powerful class through competition. This prosperous and powerful class has the ability to change the status quo and promote cultural progress. Qin State It is to unify the six countries through the struggle between countries. After that, economically, the weights and measures system will be unified, and spiritual channels of communication will be dug; culturally, the written language will be unified. Through competition, strong and powerful countries will gain power and promote social progress. Promoting cultural development has accelerated the pace of history in China. It was through class competition that the Communist Party of China overthrew three mountains and overthrew the feudal system, thus ushering in the happy life of the Chinese people now.

The level of science and technology is an expression of a country's comprehensive national strength. The key to a country's modernization is the modernization of science and technology. Science and technology competition has also become the focus of competition among countries. On October 16, 1964, the first atomic bomb developed by China was dropped in Lop Nur, Xinjiang. The explosion was successful. This was the result of China's determination to compete with other countries because it could not bear to fall behind. After that, China successfully developed and launched more than 40 satellites on this basis, following closely the United States, Russia and Japan, becoming The world's major scientific and technological countries. Even now, countries are quietly competing in various aspects. Scientific and technological competition has led to rapid development of scientific research; economic competition has led to rapid economic growth of various countries.

From the above examples , we can deeply understand the important position of competition in our lives. When we say that there is more competition than cooperation in society, it does not mean that cooperation does not exist. Cooperation also exists in our society, but it is small-scale cooperation and large-scale competition. , there is always more competition than cooperation. If cooperation overwhelms competition, and you do this and I copy the gourd, society will not be able to develop, and mankind will not be able to progress. Without competition, there would be no prosperous age of a hundred schools of thought contending, and there would be no society where a hundred flowers bloom, let alone There will be no happy and beautiful future.

Competition promotes social development and promotes human progress. Therefore, I think competition is greater than cooperation in modern society, and competition is greater than cooperation and it is inevitable for the development of modern society.

< p>Which one, cooperation or competition, can better promote the progress of civilization

The host said: Now I will introduce the affirmative 1st debate: Wu Ying; the affirmative 2nd debate: Shen Tao; the 3rd debate: Wang Qian; the affirmative 4th debate : Ding Li; Negative side 1st defense: Zhu Xiaoman; Negative side 2nd defense: Jiang Yuekai; Negative side 3rd defense: Wang Lina; Negative side 4th defense: Zhang Xiyi.

Today our affirmative argument is: Cooperation can make civilization progress better than competition. The opponent's argument is: competition can make civilization progress more than cooperation.

The host said to everyone: Now the debate will begin. First, the affirmative and first defense students will state their own views.

Opening argument stage:

The affirmative side 1 said to everyone: Dear judges, guests, and fellow debaters of the other party, hello everyone!

Our Chinese textbook says, "Modern society is a society full of competition, but it is also a society that requires more cooperation. As a modern person, only by learning to cooperate with others can we achieve greater success." Competition and cooperation are two forces that constitute life and social survival and development. There is competition in social life, but there is also cooperation.

"The Three Stooges are better than Zhuge Liang." The more people there are, the more wisdom they have. As long as they are good at cooperating and exerting the power of cooperation and unity, they can come up with solutions and achieve success.

Successful people are good at cooperation, because no one can be a lonely bird. There is a popular saying in Japan: One Chinese can defeat one Japanese, but three Chinese cannot defeat three Japanese. Although this statement means that Chinese people have the ability to compete and succeed individually, but they are not good at collective collaboration. Take the national men's volleyball team, men's basketball team, and men's football team as an example: in terms of height, we are much taller than the Japanese and Korean players; in terms of training time, we are also above them. Why do we often lose to Japan and South Korea in some key games? One of the important reasons is that they have shown a spirit of cooperation, at least better than us. It can be seen that no matter what they do, people who are good at cooperation can achieve success with the joint efforts of both parties.

However, there are many problems in competition, which can easily lead to the deterioration of interpersonal relationships and make people become more selfish and narrow-minded. It also makes many people feel great pressure, feel at a loss what to do, and even suffer from serious psychological disorders. Therefore, we believe that cooperation is more important than competition and can make civilization progress. Thanks!

The host said to everyone: Thank you to the students from the first defense side. Next, I would like to ask the students from the first defense side to state their position and please speak.

Anti-side 1 would like to say to everyone: Dear debate friends, hello everyone!

Modern society is constantly progressing due to competition! Even more energetic because of competition! We believe that competition in modern society can advance civilization more than cooperation. The pursuit of development competition can turn the backward into the advanced. Society follows this eternal law of competition to move toward modernity and the future. For individuals, the premise of competition is that everyone has the opportunity to participate in the competition, and the result must be the survival of the fittest, which ensures social fairness; the process of competition is for everyone to do their best, which in turn encourages individuals to exert their enthusiasm. In this era that calls for the strong, competition is not only a requirement of the times, but also a challenge to human nature. Let us face this era of competition directly!

Friends from the other side, aren’t you here just to compete with us? If we follow your logic, wouldn’t it make sense for us to debate here today? Today's debate is a competition to win or lose and promote progress. Thank you

The host said to everyone: Thank you, the anti-party student. The speech phase of the competition is over.

Record 2 of the Debate on Which Cooperation or Competition Can Make Civilization Progress

2. Attack and Defense Stage:

The host said to everyone: The next step is to enter the third stage. The second stage is the attack and defense stage. We first ask the affirmative and second debaters to add their own opinions.

The affirmative side 2 would like to say to everyone: Judges, opponents and friends: Hello everyone!

Mr. Sun Yat-sen said: "Species are based on competition as their principle, and humans are based on cooperation. If humans follow this principle, they will prosper, and if they do not follow this principle, they will perish." It can be seen how important cooperation is.

There is a popular saying in the north and south of the Yangtze River: everyone rows to sail a big boat. Everyone will never forget the devastating flood in 1998! Facts have proved that the victory of this special battle requires the joint efforts of all flood-fighting officers and soldiers and people of all ethnic groups across the country, in order to finally build an unbreakable flood-fighting Great Wall on the backbone of our nation.

We will never forget that when SARS was raging in 2003, it was with the joint efforts of leaders at all levels from the central to local levels and people from all walks of life that we united and achieved the final victory. victory. Therefore, all of this proves that "cooperation can make civilization progress more than competition."

Due to competition, the relationship is indifferent. You are on guard against me, and I am on guard against you. It is common to appear harmonious on the surface but compete with each other in your heart. Fellow debater on the other side, isn’t this all caused by “competition”?

The host said to everyone: Thank you, the second debate student of the affirmative side. Next, let’s listen to the rebuttal from the second debate students on the opposing side.

Anti-side 2 says to everyone: Hello everyone!

The other party's first debate was fluent, and the other party's second debate was eloquent. However, neither the microwave nor the angry waves could wash away the questions of the other debater's friends. The opponent's first argument pointed out that competition will make human beings become more selfish and narrow-minded. The various harmful effects listed by the opponent's second argument are not caused by competition, but by his own unhealthy psychology.

Our ancestors have long told us that only through competition can civilization and progress be achieved. Competition is conducive to the creation, discovery and selection of talents in society. As Lenin said: “Competition cultivates enterprising spirit, perseverance and bold initiative on a very broad scale.

"Competition is the mother of social progress.

Let us enter a competitive society and be strong. Finally, let me ask my fellow debaters, if you are so opposed to competition, does it mean that you are actually afraid of competition? < /p>

The host said to everyone: Thank you to the students from the second debate on the negative side. Next, we will invite the students from the third debate on the positive side to speak.

The third debate on the positive side said to everyone: Chairman, all judges and fellow debaters on the other side. , Hello everyone!

The first debate of the opposing side mentioned: Today’s debate is a kind of competition, and the second debate of the opposing side also mentioned: Competition causes unhealthy psychology. The opponent’s debaters regard competition as the apple of their eyes and a panacea. The view is completely wrong. Can it be said that only competition can promote the development of social civilization? Let me ask you, "It has nothing to do with yourself", "Only taking, not willing to contribute"; only emphasizing personal competition, without caring about the development and future of the country." Where did the development of civilization come from? Therefore, your idea that competition is conducive to the development of civilization is nonsense.

During the Three Kingdoms period, Sun Quan and Liu Bei united to fight against Cao Cao, establishing the situation of the Three Kingdoms; wasn’t the birth of "Das Kapital" also the result of the cooperation between Marx and Engels?

Everyone knows Michael Jordan of the Chicago Bulls, and many people may be crazy about him. Jordan's success is inseparable from the cooperation and assistance of his teammates. Looking back on the past and looking to the future, we firmly believe that "cooperation can make civilization progress"!

The host said to everyone: The content is wonderful and the expressions are also used very well. Thank you, Mr. Zhengfang Sanbian. Next, let’s listen to the rebuttal of the students from the opposing side’s third debate.

Anti-side 3 debate says to everyone: Hello, fellow judges and debate friends! Now let me present my defense in the third argument of the opposing side.

Modern society requires the use of talents according to their abilities and competition for employment. Competition is more conducive to a legal society than cooperation, ensuring the orderly progress of competition. For example: You can't cooperate with the classmates next to you during the college entrance examination, right? In sports competitions, you have to compete to win the championship, right? In the process of talent selection, if there is no competition, it can only be "a sad thing for thousands of people to wait and see"; if there is competition, it will be "reducing talents without sticking to one pattern"! Talents can be selected through competition, but can they be selected through cooperation?

Please ask the other party to answer my questions and those of the opposing side directly. Please do not avoid the questions.

The host said to everyone: Thank you to the students who opposed the third debate.

Record 3 of the Debate on Which of Cooperation and Competition Can Make Civilization Progress

3. Free Debate Stage:

The host said to everyone: I heard the representatives from both sides talk about Regarding the rhetoric of "competition and cooperation", now is the time for them to show off their eloquence. The student Zhengfang must speak first. Now the free debate begins!

The 4th affirmative said to everyone: ( ) Behind every achievement and honor, isn’t this the result of everyone’s joint cooperation?

The opponent’s 4th defense said to everyone: In the statement just now, the opponent’s 3rd defense mentioned the cooperation between Liu Bei and Sun Quan to fight against Cao Cao. Their purpose was to enhance their strength and compete better. This is not right. Is competition more important than cooperation?

Opposition 1 would like to ask everyone: I would like to ask my friends on the other side, if the United States, Britain and other countries cooperate to attack Iraq, can civilization progress?

The opposition 4th debate said to everyone: The other side mentioned that our football team cannot beat Japan and South Korea. The reason is not because we lack the sense of cooperation, but because we lack the sense of competition. No matter how high our technology is, Without a sense of competition and a desire to win, it is impossible for us to win no matter what.

The affirmative side 2 said to everyone: This shows that cooperation is the basis of competition, and competition is just a means at best. Doesn’t this also show that cooperation is more important than competition?

Opposition 2: The competition is about winning or losing. Isn’t winning and losing also competition? Why do you want to compete here? Isn’t it also for competition?

The affirmative side 1 would like to say to everyone: Isn’t the competition between both parties conducted on the basis of cooperation? Without such good cooperation, would it be possible to achieve such good results? This just shows that "cooperation can better promote the progress of civilization"!

The 3rd argument of the affirmative says to everyone: Some companies, in order to compete, eventually lead to the company becoming unprofitable or even going bankrupt.

Isn’t this caused by competition?

The affirmative side 1 would like to say to everyone: Many famous musicians at home and abroad can dominate the stage. Behind their success, there are not many people working together and working together. ?

The first defense of the affirmative said to everyone: A professor of psychology at Harvard University in the United States, he listed "sincere cooperation with colleagues" as one of the nine elements of success, and "unsociable words and deeds, not good at cooperating with others" ” is listed as the first of the nine factors of failure.

The fourth argument for the affirmative tells everyone: The first argument for the negative is that most families in China now have only children. These "little emperors" and "little princesses" especially lack the sense of cooperation. In such a society, Under the conditions, if we no longer cultivate the spirit of cooperation, but focus on cultivating the spirit of competition, what will happen to our society?

The affirmative 4th debate said to everyone: United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan said: "No matter what career you choose in the future, you must learn to cooperate with others." This is the summary of the Secretary-General's 40 years of diplomatic experience.

Anti-party 3 said to everyone: A sense of competition is an indispensable condition for the growth of talents. Competition for further education and business competition are very fierce. Then, the selection of cadres in studies is also competition. Is it possible to swim against the current? Isn't it a competition?

Anti-party 4 would like to say to everyone: Modern society requires the use of talents according to their abilities and competition for employment. I would like to ask my fellow debaters, whether competition is more important than cooperation? You can't work together, right?

The affirmative side 2 said to everyone: There is such a fable: the monkey and the elephant both want to eat the fruit from the tree on the other side. Monkeys cannot cross rivers and elephants cannot climb trees. After the two parties negotiated, the elephants carried the monkeys across the river, and the monkeys climbed up the trees to pick fruits. They all ate the fruits. This is the benefit achieved by learning from each other's strengths and complementing each other's weaknesses and working closely together.

Anti-party 2 said to everyone: If we continue to cooperate and have no spirit of innovation, mankind will only stop moving forward. If competition is not so important, then what are we still arguing here today?

The 3rd argument for the affirmative said to everyone: The 1st argument for the negative side said: Competition stimulates people's enthusiasm, but it depends on one person's strength alone. Can strength achieve your goals?

Anti-party 1 would like to say to everyone: Can the evil forces in society cooperate with each other and do all kinds of evil to make civilization progress? The Iraqi people have suffered from the war disasters brought by the United States. Do we want the Iraqi people to cooperate with the United States?

The affirmative party 3 said to everyone: We have learned such a story: ants suddenly encountered a fire on the way forward. Many ants quickly formed a ball and rolled quickly to escape the sea of ????fire. Just imagine, if everyone is scrambling to escape, and if there is no team spirit, it would be strange if the tiny ant family is not completely wiped out!

The counter-participant 2 said to everyone: I would like to ask my fellow debaters, do you cooperate or compete during the exam? If you cooperate, it is cheating!

Anti-party 1 would like to say to everyone: Isn’t it also a kind of competition for other countries to participate in the Olympic Games? Could it be that athletes from all over the world cooperate and share the gold medals equally?

The affirmative 4 debate said to everyone: I would like to ask my fellow debaters, is it a mistake for the teacher to let us do cooperative learning as much as possible in the classroom?

Anti-party 1 would like to say to everyone: International competition is becoming more complex. I would like to ask my fellow debaters, what keeps the market dynamic? It is obvious that competition is more conducive to the progress of civilization than cooperation, and is more conducive to the metabolism and overall progress of society.

(To the front) The 3rd affirmative said to everyone: If athletes from various countries do not cooperate with each other, can the competition in the Olympic Games be successful?

(To the front) Opponent 4 Debate said to everyone: Opponent 4 Debate, isn’t our cooperative learning today just to enter the society in the future and better participate in competition?

The affirmative side 2 will tell everyone: People who are not good at cooperation will find others difficult to get along with wherever they go. People who are good at cooperation will get along well with anyone they meet.

Argument 1 versus Argument 4: The United Nations' "International Commission on Education for the 21st Century" proposed the "Four Pillars of Education" to guide the cultivation of talents. The so-called "four pillars" refer to learning to recognize, learning to do, learning to cooperate and learning to survive.

The host said to everyone: Sorry, please pause. Due to time constraints, I can't let you play as much as you want.

Record 4 of the debate on whether cooperation or competition can make civilization progress more

Summary speech stage:

The host said to everyone: After a wonderful and fierce freedom Debate, now we ask students from the opposing side to summarize their speeches.

The fourth counter-argument said to everyone:

The first counter-partner emphasized that cooperation is more important than competition in modern society, which is an exaggeration. We have no eternal enemies, but we have eternal national and national interests. To safeguard our interests, only competition is the most effective way. The coexistence of greatness and frustration just shows that competition has richer connotations and more charming charm than cooperation.

Finally, I would like to emphasize once again that competition in modern society can advance civilization more than cooperation:

First, competition is the fundamental driving force for the development of modern society.

Second, competition can ensure a society that prioritizes efficiency while taking into account fairness. Promote the correct application of rights through political competition; clarify the truth, goodness and beauty of the human spirit through cultural competition, etc.

The debate is coming to an end. The competition tests our knowledge and wisdom, and also allows us to fight for our glory and dreams. Therefore, let us sincerely say: thank you for this great era of competition!

The host said to the 4 negative debate students: Thank you to the 4 negative debate students. Finally, we asked the 4 positive debate students to summarize their speeches, which also lasted 5 minutes.

The 4th argument of the affirmative says to everyone: Dear judges and friends!

The opponent 1 has repeatedly emphasized the importance of competition, but we would like to ask the opponent to clearly realize that there is a lot of cooperation in the competition process itself, and competition is to promote better cooperation. , and there are still many problems in competition, such as competition making people narrow-minded and selfish, easily causing the deterioration of interpersonal relationships, etc.

The fierce competition in reality makes many people feel great pressure, at a loss as to what to do, and even suffer from serious psychological disorders. How can these prove that competition promotes the progress of civilization? Only cooperation can promote the progress of civilization.

First of all, cooperation can help people survive better. , society is becoming increasingly complex. Only by joining hands and cooperating with each other can we tide over the difficulties.

Secondly, cooperation produces talents that are more adaptable to the development of modern society than competition. Cultivate good psychological qualities such as caring for others, solidarity and friendship.

Third, cooperation is more conducive to promoting the development of science than competition. Isn't the successful development of my country's "Shenzhou 5" spacecraft the result of the joint cooperation of many scientific researchers?

Fourth, cooperation can promote social stability more than competition. The success in fighting "floods", "SARS" and "bird flu" is the best example.

Let us join hands and cooperate together to create a more civilized future!