Jingzhou Guan Gong statue and Guizhou Water Resources Department building are demolished, so it's okay?

65438 10 8, the last day of this long golden week, the website of the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development issued a notice:

The giant statue of Guan Gong in Jingzhou City, Hubei Province destroyed the style and historical context of the ancient city. There are some problems in Shuisi Building in dushan county, Guizhou Province, such as being divorced from reality, arbitrarily building "cultural landmarks" and destroying the natural landscape. Hubei and Guizhou Provincial Department of Housing and Urban-Rural Development should cooperate with relevant departments to track and guide the project rectification.

The official sent such a notice on the way back from a business trip, which is a bit like "settling accounts after autumn" with the local government.

Of course, it is more important than accounting.

However, this seemingly named notice has sounded the alarm for similar things all over the country.

one

You may also be worried.

In the circular issued by the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, the key word "rectification" was also mentioned.

Someone has a new worry: rectification? How to fix it? The statue of Guan Gong will not be transformed into a skyscraper, will it? Besides demolition, how can we rectify it?

Others hold the opposite view. They think that when these buildings are completed, they have consumed local financial resources and labor. If we tear it down now, wouldn't it be another wave of waste? Add insult to injury.

All kinds of voices, for a time, expressed their opinions on the internet, and even quarreled with each other.

To be honest, in fact, netizens are right, and each has its own reasons. But it's really just about these things themselves. As for the real intention of the director, it is not only these strange buildings themselves, but through these phenomena, we can see all kinds of "strange faces" exploring and developing in various places. From a deeper perspective, it seems that the most important thing for "rectification" is to find the person in charge behind it through these "strange images" and investigate the responsibility, so as to make an example for others and eradicate the root cause. According to relevant media reports, Jingzhou, the world's largest statue of Guan Gong, was not initially approved by Jingzhou Natural Resources and Planning Bureau. On the contrary, Jingzhou Natural Resources and Planning Bureau sent a letter to the Municipal Urban Management Committee on June 24th, 2065438+2009, demanding that it be investigated and dealt with according to law. Afterwards, Jingzhou City Management Committee sent a letter ordering Lv Jing Group to rectify, but the other party turned a deaf ear.

As another case, the luxury water affairs bureau building, which has been built for several years and is well-known in southwest China, has been repeatedly petitioned to question its rationality, but it has been repeatedly "crab" by local authorities until the problem is disclosed by the media.

Well, the center of the problem is already obvious.

Who is obstructing the power of justice? Who is behind those people?

two

According to public reports, Jingzhou Guan Gong Yi Garden started construction in February, 20 14, and was advertised as "a well-planned major project to support Jingzhou cultural tourism and strengthen the waist, which was the number one project promoted by the company in 20 14 and one of the six billion-dollar projects built by the whole province".

It stands to reason that they already know that this is an illegal project and the procedures in their hands are not perfect. Shouldn't this be done in secret? On the contrary, they made a lot of publicity, and even advertisements went to Wuhan.

Behind this, who gave courage? Who propped up the waist?

Moreover, the Guangongyuan Park Project 20 14 was successfully selected as the national preferred tourism project 20 15, and was rated as the fifth batch of cultural industry bases in Hubei Province, which was included in the national key cultural industry project library. On the one hand, there is no policy permission, on the other hand, we are vigorously promoting key construction. How do you explain these? three

Fortunately, the power of the internet today is powerful. These two wonderful buildings were finally targeted by the hot discussion of public opinion, which led to the problem being dug up. Moreover, with the accountability and rectification that have been forced out now.

Now think about it, in fact, many times, the problem did not appear at a certain stage, but appeared at the beginning.

The problems we see are the newly-built Water Resources Department building and the statue of Guan Gong, but the real problems should have been formed in the minds of local officials several years ago. The rectification requirements of the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development are now in full swing, and I believe that the problems of these two things will be solved soon.

But what we should pay more attention to is whether there will be more similar problems in the future, and if so, how to deal with them? Is it still the same as now, when local money is spent, people use it, and things are done, then the problem is exposed. To put it more figuratively, you can't always have terminal cancer.

In my opinion, the significance of this rectification should be based more on the system and procedures of power operation, and on timely, sensitive and efficient supervision and implementation, rather than just dismantling.

After all, one or two illegal buildings are easy to dismantle, but the "distractions" in the hearts of many local politicians are difficult to dismantle.