Stepping on the lighting board on the roof, a boy in Anhui fell to his death on the roof of 16. How should his family take responsibility?

At present, the police are investigating this matter. According to the existing evidence, the property is definitely responsible, and the family members can directly file a lawsuit with the court. However, it is also a fact that the child is naughty. Therefore, this tragedy is not the unilateral responsibility of the property. The property is definitely responsible and compensated, but the children and parents also need to bear corresponding responsibilities for this tragedy.

First of all, according to the mother of the dead boy, the child was always taken away by his parents. On the day the child was killed, he went to the sixteenth floor. At that time, no protective measures were installed on the rooftop of the sixteenth floor. As a result, the child accidentally fell down because he stepped on the lighting board naughty. When the security guard found the child, the child had no signs of life.

The mother of the dead boy believes that the property bears a great responsibility in this tragedy. First, there are no warning signs in dangerous places, and no protective measures have been taken near the rooftop. In addition, the lighting board has not been overhauled for many years, resulting in serious aging of the lighting board, and the ten-year-old child stepped on it and cracked.

Secondly, the property also agrees with the mother of the dead boy. At present, the police have been involved in the investigation. I believe there will be investigation results soon, and the death of the boy is absolutely inseparable from the irresponsibility of the residential property. Therefore, family members should seek compensation from the property. If the property is willing to take the initiative to compensate or communicate compensation, that is the best solution. If the property is unwilling to cooperate, then parents should take judicial procedures.

Finally, if parents take the judicial approach, the possibility of winning the case is very high, because our country's laws stipulate that the property should regularly check the relevant public facilities. If the owners of residential areas are in danger or have a tragedy because of public equipment problems, they should first investigate the responsibility of the property, which is also a warning to local properties that these public equipment must be inspected.