If the property tax comes, how to collect half of the small property houses in the country?

The country is also the first two big for small property rights.

I didn't care at first, but the result was like a single spark burning bigger and bigger. I can't think of any way to manage it, so I have to turn a blind eye. ...

No one wants to take care of it now.

People who bought small property rights at first didn't want to speculate in real estate at all. Gradually, smart people began to buy several sets to gamble. ...

At present, there are two kinds of people living in small property houses. One is the old people (they gave their original big property rights to their descendants and gave them small property rights), and the other is that foreigners plan long-term and it is too expensive to buy big property rights, so they have to turn to small property rights. The rest are rented to migrant workers, and the rent is cheap. Both of them are good.

The problem of small property houses, although the housing and construction departments bite their teeth and say that they can't turn positive, there are still many ways to recognize it. For example, a real estate tax is an option.

With some experts' casual explanations, people tend to think that real estate tax is a punitive tax on the owners of multiple properties. Don't think too well.

Real estate tax has never been a tax to punish people who own multiple houses. It is a local tax to make up for the shortage of government municipal public fees.

For example, Australia is directly called municipal tax.

At present, most of the municipal public expenditure in China is solved by land transfer fees. However, the land transfer fee is one-time and cannot be collected again within 70 years. So some experts began to play the idea of real estate tax.

Although a vest has been changed, the content and significance are still the same, so many experts and scholars call this double taxation fee.

In fact, in any case, we live in a place and enjoy the environment of this place. There is a place that provides services such as safety, education and health. It is appropriate to pay taxes to this place. The most appropriate way is to pay taxes every year, and the land transfer fee is very simple and rude.

Why do many real estate developers shoot land desperately? Because they think that the land transfer fee is not their own, someone pays the bill anyway. That's the ultimate consumer.

So the way of real estate tax in the future may exceed everyone's imagination.

First of all, what must be expropriated is probably a small property house. The state recognizes your existence, but you have not paid the one-time land transfer fee to the local government, so you have to pay the real estate tax on a monthly basis.

Second, according to this logic. Real estate tax can be levied according to a certain proportion. For example, in the 1990s, 90% of the houses with small property rights were expropriated, 70% in 2000, 50% in 20 10, and maybe 30% in the latest. As for the real estate tax, it is really unlikely that the land transfer fee already paid will be deducted.

Third, the collection of real estate tax should be mainly local. In some places, when the land transfer fee is sufficient, the motivation is obviously insufficient.

In addition, some areas try to use small property houses as rentable houses to increase supply and reduce rents. These signs are the possibility that small property houses will turn positive.

In fact, it can be seen that the role of real estate networking is actually not great, and it is unlikely to impose property liquidated damages on multiple housing holders.

What the country should do most is to increase people's holding costs. Reducing one-off expenses can reduce house prices. Raise the cost of ownership and let people in need live in houses. The cost of the ownership link is not only the property tax, but also the property utilities, including rent management fees, home insurance, sewage charges and so on. As long as these expenses are greatly increased, the phenomenon of hoarding houses will definitely disappear.

But it's easier said than done. How many people are willing to pay thousands of dollars in taxes and fees for their houses every year? And you know that house prices will fall.

According to statistics, there are about 7 billion square meters of small property houses in China. Because the small property right house has not gone through the formal bidding, auction and hanging system, and has not paid the relevant taxes and fees in the transaction, it is only a purchase agreement signed with the village collective or town at the time of purchase, so it is not a legally recognized property right house at present, so there is no record of the housing management departments at all levels.

We know that the property tax is levied on normal and legal property houses that have been filed in the housing management department. So what happens when such a large small property right house is not filed when the property tax is levied?

Personally, I feel that before the property tax is levied, there will be a clear plan for the treatment of small property houses.

According to the current relevant departments, small property houses are illegal buildings and must be demolished, and personal interests cannot be guaranteed after demolition. Now, in many places like Beijing, Hainan and Henan, some small property houses have been demolished. Of course, the reasons are different.

However, there is still a problem. At present, the number of small property houses in China is very large, involving a wide range of people. If it is completely demolished, it will be very difficult, which will cause some unpredictable risks and a great waste of personal and social resources. Therefore, it may be a possible direction for small property houses to turn positive.

Because the small property houses did not pay the relevant taxes and fees from the land before the construction and during the transaction, if the small property houses turn positive in the future, they need to pay the corresponding land transfer fees and pay the relevant taxes and fees that need to be paid in the transaction.

The property right issue after becoming a full member may be the type of public rental housing and low-rent housing implemented in many places at present, or it may be a normal property right house or other property right types, and it is also possible.

However, what is certain is that before the introduction of property tax, the problem of small property houses needs to be solved, because in terms of taxation, if the problem of small property houses is not solved, it means that there is no need to pay taxes. To some extent, this is unfair to those who buy formal commercial housing through normal channels.

The more you share, the more you gain!

The real estate tax to be levied soon is actually the real estate tax. Property is damaged, the basic 50-year life expires and gradually depreciates. Land is limited. With the increase of urban population, the imbalance between supply and demand, land prices continue to rise. Commercial housing has paid the rent for 70 years, and the property right belongs to the state, so it is unreasonable to levy real estate tax on commercial housing. Small property houses have not paid rent, and the land is collectively owned by the villagers and belongs to private property rights. Therefore, there is no legal problem in levying real estate tax on small property houses, just taking the opportunity to turn small property houses into full members and allow listing and trading. Such a small property right house, even if it is listed and traded, will not have a big impact on housing prices. After all, I bought a small property right house and paid property tax every year. Commercial housing that has been built can be automatically converted into private property rights after the expiration of 70 years, and then real estate tax is paid every year. At present, land that is not auctioned in big cities should be auctioned according to permanent property rights, and then real estate tax should be levied year by year. Write a few simple words without spraying.

By the way, if you choose to collect taxes and fees for 70 years at a time or collect taxes and fees year by year, I believe the local government is still willing to collect taxes and fees for 70 years at a time. Therefore, the real estate tax is still on paper.

You can't cut a radish at both ends. Sugarcane cannot be sweet at both ends. It has huge property rights and enjoys a huge bubble. It must pay taxes. The state does not recognize small property rights, and of course it cannot pay taxes. According to the Central Committee, to completely solve this problem, reform should solve the hard bones. According to the Constitution, the state ownership of public ownership is the same as the right of collective identity. Why do houses built on state-owned land (sold to developers after expropriation) have high status and soaring prices, while houses built on collective land, black households and black households, are labeled as small property rights, and the prices are very different, which is unconstitutional? Now collective construction land is no longer levied and directly enters the market. Farmers are citizens. According to the central spirit, houses are used for living. Houses with large and small property rights are also used for living, and the rights should be the same! Should be equal, everyone should have the same title certificate and pay the same tax! This is a hard bone, this is reform! Never be afraid of the opposition of real estate speculators and a handful of other people! The broad masses of the people absolutely support it. Otherwise, the small property rights will not be solved in a hundred years!

This is a test of the government's management wisdom: it is not difficult to be fair and reasonable, but also to collect money from the people. If you can't afford it, or if you don't, what can you do, force it? It is best for the state to give benefits to every citizen. For example, in 500 yuan every month, it will be deducted directly when collecting taxes, so that everyone can enjoy the benefits fairly, and the problem of collecting taxes will not be a problem. As for where the welfare money comes from, if the finance is not enough, you can be naked (print more money). Although more money will depreciate, if everyone enjoys the benefits, every citizen should bear the depreciation.

If the property tax comes, how to collect half of the small property houses in the country?

If there is no property right, it can be supplemented. In those days, a special department could be set up for family planning. Why is real estate not working now?

If a special statistical department is set up, property tax will be levied on properties beyond the limited standards. Isn't that okay?

Just like having a child in those days was no problem, so was having a second child.

It's just another form of cutting meat with a blunt knife.

You must sell the house, otherwise, you will pay back the money every year.

Of course, it is hard to say whether the money will be discounted, but if the property tax comes, I am afraid that some people who have not bought a house will wait and see first.

Let's see if this house price is going up or down. As for those real estate speculators, who can blame them for their own speculation?

Investment is risky, as it is in any industry.

The problem of small property houses has a long history, and the voice of real estate tax is not a day or two. So what should we do if these two thorny problems come together?

According to the suggestions made by State Taxation Administration of The People's Republic of China, China Academy of Social Sciences, experts and the media at the end of last year, it is very likely that the real estate tax will be treated differently according to the stock houses and incremental houses in the future. "In the process of promoting the legislation and reform of real estate-related tax system, we should study the tax policy of real estate transaction and retention as a whole-People's Republic of China (PRC) State Taxation Administration of The People's Republic of China", which means that the real estate tax will not be levied on the stock houses for the time being, but on the incremental houses or transaction houses.

There are too many interests involved in real estate tax, which is the biggest reason why it has not been able to land for so many years. The above collection opinions can minimize contradictions and speed up the legislation and implementation of real estate tax.

Fan Gang, a famous economist, also put forward his own views on the distinction between "incremental housing" and "stock housing" in real estate tax: in the final analysis, the biggest obstacle to real estate tax is how to balance vested interests. It is suggested to give the original building a relatively large buffer space from the new project, with a period of 10 ~ 20 years. Take your time!

Although the small property right house is not protected by law, it is also a kind of stock house. According to the relevant documents of Shenzhen at the end of 20 18, there is no future for small property houses to turn positive. If the real estate tax is levied, wouldn't it be a recognition of the identity of a small property right house? Personally think this possibility is very small!

The biggest legal problem of small property houses is that "collective land is transformed into state-owned land". Last year, Beijing, Liaoning, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Anhui, Fujian, Henan, Hubei, Guangdong and other places passed the "Pilot Program for Building Rental Housing with Collective Construction Land". It is unknown whether to pave the way for the "small property right house to rent house", but it should be the most suitable way to solve the small property right house at present, and will not lead to the ownership problem of the small property right house. While promoting the legalization of small property houses, it also solves the phenomenon of illegal transactions of small property houses.

However, the above problems are all imaginary. Everything needs to wait for the real estate tax to land, how and when to collect it, and then talk about the tax issue of small property houses after the tax allowance is determined.

We don't know the preconditions of these problems.

Assumptions are always assumptions.

I have no ability to predict, let alone know in advance how the national policy should go. Speculation here may mislead some people!

But at present, it is impossible for property tax to involve small property rights in a short time. Small property houses are neither legal nor illegal, and they are all over Beijing, Nanjing, Chongqing, Shenzhen and other regions.

Among them, Shenzhen is the largest, accounting for about 50% of Shenzhen, with a permanent population of more than180,000, and a population of nearly 9 million living in small property houses in Shenzhen (excluding other places). It takes a lot of time and various factors to realize it.

However, at present, the "I say the current" property tax cannot involve small property rights.

This is my personal opinion. If there are any shortcomings, please advise!

If property tax is levied one day in the future, it will definitely be levied on large property houses. What about small property rights? Imagine, you should also collect it. If you don't accept it, it is unfair to the owners who buy commercial housing. There are a large number of small property houses in the market, and these houses have no real estate license. How to levy real estate tax on such a huge stock market? This is worth discussing.

I adopted the opinions and suggestions of some netizens. Welcome to comment and discuss!

1. specifies the time limit for small property houses. For example, from 20 12, the previous houses with small property rights and houses with large property rights were registered together, and the land transfer price was 20 12. After paying the land transfer fee, the property certificate was processed and legalized. Houses after 20 13 are demolished according to illegal construction or acquired by relevant local departments. Existing small property houses should also be supplemented with land transfer fees, turned into commercial houses, and then paid property tax.

2. If you don't turn small property rights into full property rights, you won't receive property tax in the future, and although these small property rights can't be transferred, they are also "sold" by agreement and are tax-free. If small property rights are turned into full property rights, they can not only collect more taxes and fees, but also collect land transfer fees. As for the impact of small property rights becoming full property rights on commercial housing and land sales, there are not many land sales in Shenzhen anyway, and the negative impact can be ignored.

3, the property tax should first solve the taxable problem from the legislative technology, from commercial housing to military housing, small property rights housing, housing reform housing, welfare housing, affordable housing, price-limited housing, property rights housing and so on. These types should be considered. The ownership of individual houses is only the buildings on the land. In the housing value, the land value accounts for the largest proportion, and each city and district is different.

4. Small property houses are not compliant, and most of them are built on collective land. If it is purchased by villagers within the village collective, it is completely legal. Compensation should also be paid for the demolition of small property houses, and compensation for small property houses should also be paid. If the compensation for small property houses fails, it is necessary to compensate for large property houses. Non-village collective members who buy houses with small property rights will only pay the cost of the house when making compensation in the future.