The owner of the residential villa is in trouble with the property. The built house is demolished, why is the property illegal?

As ordinary people, the most important thing in life is food, clothing, housing and transportation. Everyone is fighting for it. Living here means a house. Some people have bought houses and lived a happy life. Others are struggling on the way to buy a house. Of course, everyone knows that houses are not built casually. Even if you buy a ready-made commercial house, you are not allowed to change the main structure at will. There is a news item on the Internet that has attracted many people's attention. It is the villa owner of a certain community who is more involved in the property because of illegal construction. At the beginning, the real estate promotion was to buy a house of 137, which was also written in the brochure, but it was not written in the brochure when the house was handed over. After the house was handed over, the owner wanted to rebuild it himself and restore it to the size in the brochure, but the property was called illegal construction. Then why should the property be said to be illegal? The property is based on the Land Management Law and the Urban Planning Law.

Because all commercial houses are specially designed and can only be built after the approval of relevant departments, that is to say, other buildings are illegal as long as they exceed the design drawings, which means that the owners do have illegal construction, but the owners are innocent after all, and they were also advertised in the developer's brochure at the beginning. The owners only believed in the brochure, which caused the incident. Owners are also victims, and specific responsibilities need to be borne or compensated by developers.

In the local media department, it also followed the report and appeared in the local TV program "The First Scene". The reporter has been helping the owner to contact the developer, but he has been unable to contact. In fact, the property has no right to remove illegal construction. Property only has the right to supervise, and can only issue rectification notices and persuasion. The real right is the urban planning department. I think this matter still needs the help of relevant departments to solve, and I hope to give innocent car owners a fair.

So what do you think is the right to property? Please leave a message in the comments section.