Do you think it is appropriate because the property prevents the owners from growing vegetables in public green space? What is the reason?

The owner forbids the property to grow vegetables on public land. I don't think it's appropriate to grow vegetables on public land, because the place downstairs belongs to the whole building, and the land you bought is not your own. You can contract a small piece to grow vegetables, but you shouldn't plant them on a large scale. There are actually great hidden dangers. If someone steals food from your house,

Nowadays, many old people grow vegetables downstairs in order not to spend money on food. Of course, it is also possible to grow vegetables, but one of them is to plant a few acres of land, which will lead to the loss of green plants downstairs, all of which are vegetables. Of course, the vegetables they watch every day are not grown by themselves, which will make some people feel very helpless, so the property will also put an end to public vegetable growing. I don't think these owners should stop it. Because the community manages this place after all, it may be reported by others that it grows vegetables by itself, so the community takes charge, so no matter what happens, it must be punished by itself, because the land is not its own. If you have a yard or a property to discuss contracting this land, you can cultivate it yourself, but you can't hand in the land and yard without contracting. The green plants in the community have destroyed your own land.

Of course, there are also shortcomings in the practice of property management. Although these owners did something wrong, it was their hard work for a year. After a bumper harvest, they can continue to plant green plants and uproot their own land directly, which will feel like destroying crops. Therefore, before they uproot their own land, they must also discuss with the owners to see which time period is the best to uproot their land. Of course, if some owners don't accept it, they should follow suit.