If you are from the personnel department of the street property management station

When you finish a job, you think the way required by the leader is not the best, and you have a better way. What should you do?

In principle, I will respect and obey the work arrangement of the leader; At the same time, privately find opportunities to express their ideas in a consultative tone and see if the leaders can change their minds. If the leader doesn't take my advice, I will finish the work seriously according to the leader's requirements. On the other hand, if the way demanded by the leader violates the principle, I will resolutely raise objections; If the leader is still opinionated, I will not hesitate to report to the superior leader again.

What should you do if you are hired by our company through this interview, but after working for a period of time, you find that you are not suitable for this position at all?

After a while, I found that my job didn't suit me. There are two situations: if you really love this profession, you must keep learning, learn business knowledge and experience from leaders and colleagues with an open mind, understand the spiritual connotation and professional requirements of this profession, and strive to narrow the gap; If you think this career is dispensable, you'd better change careers as soon as possible and find a career that suits you and you love, then your development prospects will be greater, which will be beneficial to both units and individuals.

You are presiding over a meeting, and the opposing sides have changed from arguing to swearing. What should you do?

As the host of the meeting, I will record the arguments and topics of both sides, and then suggest that everyone should be quiet first, or simply adjourn for half an hour. After everyone can sit down calmly, I'll explain the purpose of this meeting again, which is to ask everyone to discuss a problem calmly and propose a solution instead of arguing. When the situation is under my control, I will ask each side to send a representative to summarize their opinions, viewpoints and plans. By explaining their reasons, everyone raised their hands and voted, and the minority obeyed the majority opinion. I will also write the final result into the minutes of the meeting for future reference.

If you have a stubborn and arbitrary leader, will you often make reasonable suggestions?

Under normal circumstances, leaders and colleagues can't choose. Everyone has his own personality and temper, so we should learn to adapt and get along. Leaders are straightforward, carefree and stubborn. As long as he works for the public, he should be respected and forgiven, and he should follow his arrangement. When appropriate, you can put forward your own views euphemistically by talking and reporting your thoughts, but don't stop there. When there are reasonable suggestions, follow them. Because it is responsible for yourself and your work.

If you go to a new department and find that the situation is very bad, the work is unfavorable and the relationship with colleagues is very bad, what efforts will you make to change this situation?

First of all, you should set an example. You should work hard, get on well with comrades in the department and motivate others to work. You can organize some activities appropriately to combine work and rest. On the one hand, it is conducive to uniting comrades and increasing everyone's feelings in activities; On the other hand, proper rest adjustment is also conducive to better work. You can make suggestions to the leaders, link the realization of personal work goals with the annual assessment, and improve everyone's work enthusiasm through material and spiritual rewards.

As the saying goes, "Without rules, there is no Fiona Fang", but some people say that if you want to innovate, you can't follow the rules. what do you think?

There is some truth in the saying "Without rules, there would be no Fiona Fang". Innovation is difficult to succeed without certain rules. Even if there is innovation, it may do more harm than good and has no practical significance. But we can't stick to the rules. Sometimes, we have to bravely break through the restrictions of "rules" and insist on "innovation". The great benefits brought by China's reform and opening up are the best evidence. In my opinion, rules and innovation are closely linked and dialectically unified. The key to the problem lies in the grasp of "degree". How to grasp this degree between rules and innovation is a problem that we still have to consider in the future.