How does the company respond to the accidental death of a property employee cleaning up the accumulated water on the roof?

An accidental death of a property employee occurred in August, 20 18, and a man accidentally slipped and died while cleaning up the water on the roof of Building A. After the incident, the victim's family took the owner of Building A to court and demanded a claim of 8 1 0,000. The family believes that the victim used to be a property employee, but since July 2065438+2006, the victim was directly entrusted by all the owners of Building A, in short, it was an employment relationship, so all the owners of Building A should be responsible for the accident of the deceased. In this case, the property company where the deceased is located is not within the scope of the dispute, so there is not much reaction.

But the owner holds different views on this case, which is also the focus of this case. They believe that there is no labor relationship between the deceased and the owner, but it is directly managed by the property company. At the same time, they also submitted receipts for fees, which are all from the property management company, that is to say, the property management company served them without losing the victim himself. At the same time, the owner also pointed out that the deceased wore slippers and lacked safety awareness during the period of cleaning up stagnant water, which led to the tragedy, and individuals were also responsible.

After the first trial, the court held that there was no labor relationship between the deceased and the owner of Building A, and decided to reject all the claims of the deceased's family. However, the family refused to accept the appeal, and the second trial still upheld the original judgment and rejected the appeal. This matter came to an end. During the whole incident, we found that the family of the deceased did not sue the property company. Why? Moreover, during the second trial, family members should have been able to add a property company as a party, but they did not fulfill their rights, which made people guess.

In any case, the deceased has passed away for many years, and the family members must be very heartbroken. It is important to safeguard legitimate rights and interests, but we should also believe that the law is fair and just, and we should not influence the judgment because we are a vulnerable group. Here, I would also like to remind everyone that when carrying out dangerous operations such as high altitude, we must take preventive measures, and we must not lose our lives and pay a painful price because of carelessness.