Property companies in residential areas, do they have the right to install billboards on the roof of residential areas without authorization?

Friends who live in the city center will find that billboards are usually hung on the fa? ades or roofs of houses in their own communities. As we all know, advertising fees are charged for advertising to others, so who collects this advertising fee?

At the beginning of 20 16, Miss Yuan bought a hardcover existing house facing the street on the top floor in a second-tier city center. Because it is located in the city center, it has complete facilities and convenient life, and Miss Yuan herself is very satisfied.

Last National Day holiday, Miss Yuan and her family traveled to Southeast Asia and had a pleasant holiday. When she came back from a long vacation, she was shocked! During my holiday, I put up a huge neon sign on my roof.

She thought that this must be the ghost of the property, and deliberately installed billboards on the roof of her house while she was away. Looking for property theory, I put forward two propositions: first, immediately remove billboards; Second, if the billboard is not removed, the advertising revenue will be owned by itself.

The property argued that the advertisement was pulled by the property company and the proceeds should be collected by the property company.

Who do you think makes sense when things come to this?

"Property Law" stipulates that "owners have the ownership of the exclusive parts of buildings such as business buildings and have the right to manage the use of * * other than the exclusive parts."

"Property Management Regulations" stipulates that "a place that uses a property with * * * parts and * * * facilities and equipment for business operation shall go through relevant procedures in accordance with the regulations after obtaining the consent of relevant owners, owners' congress and property management enterprises. The owner's income should be mainly used to supplement special maintenance funds, or it can be used according to the decision of the owners' meeting. "

According to the law, let's analyze the situation in the case

A, the case involves the roof, should belong to the exclusive part of the * * *, Miss Yuan has the right to * * *. To be clear, only * * * has this right, not the roof of Miss Yuan's house belongs to her personally, but to all the owners.

2. Before setting up billboards, the consent of relevant owners, owners' congress and property management companies shall be obtained. The giant neon billboard in the case caused some light pollution to Miss Yuan's home. Miss Yuan is an interested party, but without her consent in advance, the procedure is flawed.

Third, the advertising revenue in the case is neither owned by Miss Yuan personally nor by the property management company, but should be owned by all owners, and its use will be decided by the owners' meeting.