Tile laying: Is it feasible to lay new tiles directly on the original basis?

Have you ever thought about replacing the tile skirting line at home with new clothes? Some owners have lived for a long time, tired of looking at the tiles on the ground, and want to bring new feelings to their homes. So, is it feasible to lay new tiles directly on the original tiles? This article will answer this question for you.

The key issue is waterproof.

It is the most unwise to lay new tiles directly on the original basis. The key problem lies in waterproofing. The property is guaranteed for at least two years for the waterproof problem of the house. If new tiles are directly laid on the original tiles, water leakage will occur in the later period, and the property will shirk its responsibility, and the construction party will not bear it. Finally, the owner will pay the bill.

Decoration can't save trouble, just make do.

Decoration is a big project, so we can't make do with it. You can make do with the obvious places, but you must pay attention to the hidden works. Many car owners often turn this upside down. If the owner finds someone to do it himself and is willing to bear the consequences, then he can try. But if we decorate, we can't.

The cost is higher but the effect is better.

If the owner wants to completely change, smash the original tiles and make waterproof pavement again, which can meet the demand, but the cost is higher. It will be better if the terrace is closed as an indoor part in the future. But if it's always on, it's easy to go wrong. If such a terrace does not waterproof itself again before laying tiles, it is equivalent to burying hidden dangers for itself. Once the water leaks, it can hardly be repaired, and the whole ground can only be waterproof again.