Changsha men's garage fell with multiple fractures and claimed compensation from the property. Property: Is it reasonable for adults to be responsible for themselves?

Unreasonable, the property is partly responsible.

It is unreasonable for the property management to say that adults should be responsible for themselves. In this accident, the property should also bear part of the responsibility. As the manager of the garage, the property management company failed to clean up the accumulated water in the garage in time and did not set warning signs, which caused the owner to fall, and should bear part of the responsibility and make appropriate compensation to the owner.

When the man made a claim against the property, he asked the property to pay more than 90,000 yuan for medical expenses and lost time. The property believes that the man is an adult and is responsible for his actions, and only agrees to pay 30%. The man does not recognize the compensation for the property, and the two sides cannot reach an agreement. After the media intervention, the residential property expressed its willingness to pay compensation, but it was impossible to pay compensation 100%. They think that car owners are adults and should be responsible for their own rates. The owner himself is also responsible for this accident, and the property should not bear full responsibility.

The property management company has purchased public insurance for all owners. Audited by the insurance company, the man's total economic loss was as high as 90,000 yuan. However, the property believes that this man is an adult and he should be responsible for his actions, so his fall is related to himself, not the full responsibility of the property, so the property is only willing to bear 30% compensation. This statement about real estate also has some truth. If a man demands full compensation for his property, he should not be supported and protected by law. The two sides are arguing over the division of responsibilities, and the best way is to resort to law.

The lawyer also suggested that if the responsibility is unclear and the two parties cannot negotiate, the man can directly take the property to court and claim compensation from the property through litigation. The judicial organ shall determine the responsibilities of both parties according to the facts and make a fair judgment. If the court thinks that 30% property compensation is reasonable, then men can only accept it. If the court decides that the property bears more responsibilities, then the property will have to pay higher compensation.