The fire fighting in the community was blocked by lifting poles. Why does the property not act?

A fire broke out in a residential area in Pingdingshan City, Henan Province. The fire department of Pingdingshan City urgently arranged the fire truck to put out the fire in the residential area, but it was blocked by the lifting bar at the door of the security booth, and the security booth did not arrange personnel to be on duty. In order to deal with the fire in an emergency, firefighters had no choice but to dismantle the lifting rod and cross the occupied fire escape before entering the community and successfully controlling the fire. The fire escape is the exit of life and cannot be occupied at any time. As the property has set up a security booth here, no security guards are arranged to be on duty. As a residential property, this is how inaction. In this incident, the inaction of the property is manifested in the following aspects:

1. The property has a security booth, and there are no security personnel on duty. The setting of the security booth is to facilitate the management of the community and better serve the owners. Therefore, in order to reflect the original intention of the property service owners, security personnel should be arranged to be on duty here, and it is also convenient to handle and contact in case of emergencies. However, although the incident community set up a security booth, but no one cares, how to reflect the purpose of serving the owners. This time it happened to be a fire in the community, and the fire truck rushed to put out the fire. However, because of the lifting bar, it was impossible to enter the community, which not only failed to serve the owners, but would cause greater harm.

2. Occupy the fire escape. The fire passage is the passage of life, and no one can occupy it at any time, which is also written into the fire prevention law. However, it can be seen from this incident that the security booth set by the property is not only empty, but also the fire escape of the community is occupied, and the community property should bear the responsibility for this.

3. No fire inspection was arranged. It can also be seen from this incident that the property should not do any fire inspection work for the community. As can be seen from the details, the management of the property in the community should be chaotic, and such a working attitude will definitely not serve the owners.

Fortunately, firefighters took the initiative to dismantle the lifting pole in time and controlled the fire in time. Residential property should learn from this incident, actively carry out rectification and truly implement it to service owners.