Why should Hangzhou nanny compensate the property for arson?

Legal analysis: I also failed to fulfill the relevant fire control obligations seriously. The fire hydrants here are beautifully sealed in the wall, and the property needs to be opened with tools such as suction cups. One of the doors took three minutes to pry open. In contrast, traditional fire hydrants can be used by breaking glass. Some owners photographed the fire-fighting equipment inspection record card removed from the fire hydrant, and the inspection time on the card was "10 15, February 15, March 15, April 15 and May respectively. In the video, the owner smeared it with his finger and found that the handwriting was not dry. And the owner opened the door of the fire hydrant and found that the hose could not be connected to the bayonet of the fire hydrant at all, and the bayonet of the hose could not be installed at that position. All kinds of doubts point to whether the property has earnestly fulfilled its fire protection obligations, which is the core crux of this tragic escalation.

Legal basis: Paragraph 2 of Article 18 of the Fire Protection Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) stipulates that residential property service enterprises shall maintain the fire-fighting facilities used by * * in the management area and provide fire safety prevention services.