What did the application for the families of the victims of Hangzhou nanny arson write?

On February 25th, 65438, Lin Shengbin, the family member of the victim of nanny arson in Hangzhou, applied to Hangzhou Public Security Fire Bureau for publishing fire investigation report and other related information through his Weibo.

Lin Shengbin applied for nine items of information disclosure in the application, including: 1, the investigation conclusion of the joint investigation team of provincial and municipal fire departments; 2. Evidence that the fire safety management of the property in the burning building community is not put in place; 3. Evidence of insufficient emergency handling capacity of the property management unit in the fire building community; 4. The fire-fighting facilities and fire-fighting facilities in the fire-fighting building area are not operating normally; 5, fire assessment and summary report (text, charts, photos, videos);

6. Fire alarm records and timing records; 7, fire scene commander issued orders, instructions and implementation of written records or live audio, video and photos; 8, rescue the applicant's wife and three children action written records or live audio and video and photos; 9, take fire detection, fire power deployment, fighting, demolition and fire water supply measures such as written records or on-site audio and video recordings and photos.

No matter what the motive is, the consequences are too serious, and the nanny doesn't care if she lives or dies. The question is what happened after the fire? Is it true that the lawyer said that there was something wrong with the fire-fighting equipment in the property?