Job Recruitment Website - Property management - The court decided to refund the overcharged property fees to the owners.

The court decided to refund the overcharged property fees to the owners.

Because the property fee exceeded the standard, the owner of 20 1 household in European classic Wan Xingyuan community took the other party to court. Yesterday, the reporter learned that Beijing No.2 Intermediate People's Court ruled that Beijing Zhonghai Property Management Co., Ltd. should refund the overcharged property fee of 260 yuan to 5,000 yuan respectively.

During the period from 1999 to 2002, 20 1 owners purchased the European classic Wan Xingyuan residential area in Chaoyang District. At that time, the owner and the property management company did not agree on the specific charging items and standards of property fees. After the property management company, the property management fee will be charged at 3. 15 yuan per square meter. The owner thinks that there is a big gap between the defendant's charging standard and the service level, and asks the court to confirm that the original charging standard is invalid.

During the lawsuit, the owner was stopped from supplying hot water because of arrears in heating costs, and the property company posted a notice for the owner in the community. Under the coordination of the court, the relevant departments resumed the hot water supply, and both the property and the owner indicated that they would not take excessive actions to resolve the dispute according to law.

According to the reply of Beijing Price Bureau, the European classic Wan Xingyuan residential area belongs to ordinary residence, and the charging standard of ordinary residence should be implemented until June 25th, 2003. The management fee can be increased by 10% to 25% on the basis of the prescribed standards within two years if it is rated as a municipal excellent management residential district. In June, 2000, 165438+ 10, the European classic nanyuan managed by the defendant was awarded as an excellent managed residential district in Beijing.

The court held that the defendant raised or disguised the charging standards for some projects. When Nanyuan, Wan Xingyuan, which he managed, was rated as an excellent managed residential community, the property fee standard for the plaintiff who did not live within the scope was raised by 25%, which was actually an elevator price increase.

(The above answers were published on 20 14-07-04. Please refer to the current actual purchase policy. )

Comprehensive and timely real estate information, click to view.