A girl in Zhuzhou, Hunan Province fell from the eighth floor when she was trapped in the elevator to find her parents. Who do you think is responsible?

On August 28th, a 3-year-old girl and her grandmother celebrated her great-grandmother's birthday in a residential area in Zhuzhou, Hunan Province. When they got on the elevator, an accident happened.

Because the little girl walked faster, she advanced into the elevator. Her grandmother, because she is older, should be over 80 years old and walk very slowly.

This caused grandma not to walk to the elevator door, and then the elevator door closed. In other words, the little girl is the only one left in the elevator.

Because the girl is only three years old, only herself, without anyone's company, she is still very scared.

I slapped nervously in the little girl's elevator. She didn't go out when the elevator reached the fourth floor. However, no grandma was found, no one.

Then she went to the elevator, which took her to the eighth floor.

It was on this floor that the little girl had an accident.

Because she fell from the eighth floor window while climbing the windowsill of the corridor.

Later, the little girl's parents arrived, and then, after the police arrived, they conducted an investigation on the scene to confirm that the girl accidentally fell.

Now the little girl's family has sued the property and developers.

Because they think the child's death is related to the property being given to the developer.

The reason is that the child fell from under the windowsill, and the reason why he fell is because the windowsill of the house was designed too low.

If the design was too high for children to reach, wouldn't such an accident happen?

Of course, that's what my parents said.

Property and developers also have their own opinions. They say that the appraisal department will conduct appraisal, and they will act in full accordance with the appraisal results.

In fact, the General Principles for Civil Building Design issued by the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development has relevant provisions:

The clear height of the window sill of the residential building facing the air shall not be less than 0.9M from the ground, otherwise protective facilities shall be set, and the height of the protective facilities shall not be less than 0.9m from the ground.

The house in this community where the incident happened, the height of the windowsill they measured was 0.92m, which was more than 0.9m, so. In this way, there is nothing illegal about developers and properties.

As the netizen said, in fact, this happened because of the guardian's problem. It is really dangerous for an 80-year-old man to see a 3-year-old child.

Although such a tragedy happened, no one wanted to see it. However, parents must be reminded that there must be snacks, especially when looking after children, not to let a person of this age look after a three-year-old child.

Therefore, the main responsibility is that the parents of the children are not well supervised.

what do you think?

It's really hard to see this news! Another child lost his life because of the negligence of adults!

Case review: August 28, 65438+ around 0 pm.

Venue: Dayue Xingfuli Community, Lukou District, Zhuzhou City

The characters are a three-year-old girl and her grandmother.

On the afternoon of the incident, MengMeng, a three-year-old girl, followed her grandmother to visit her great-grandmother in Happiness Village. At that time, the three of them were going to take the elevator together, but the great-grandmother was old and slow, so the elevator closed automatically when she was ready to get into the elevator.

After the elevator door was closed, MengMeng slammed the door hard, and panicked MengMeng hurried to press the elevator. As a result, he pressed the fourth floor After the elevator reached the fourth floor, MengMeng got out of the elevator and found no one outside. He immediately returned to the elevator. After the elevator came to the eighth floor, MengMeng got off the elevator, climbed the window and fell from the stairwell window on the eighth floor, and died on the spot.

Who is responsible for MengMeng's fall from the stairwell? No one wants this kind of thing to happen, but since it happened, someone must take responsibility. I think this incident is mainly caused by parents' carelessness and poor supervision.

MengMeng's family members believe that apart from poor family supervision, the property company and the developer are also responsible for the accident. Because MengMeng is one meter tall, but the windowsill where she fell is only 92cm high from the ground, and a prominent skirting line is designed at the bottom. MengMeng's parents think that if the window is designed higher, then MengMeng will definitely not fall from the windowsill.

As for the division of responsibilities, we are not professionals. I believe the police will judge who is responsible. But what is certain is that the main reason for MengMeng's depravity is poor family supervision.

If parents have a high sense of safety and don't let their children run around and hold their hands while taking the elevator, can such a thing be avoided? But parents have no such consciousness at all. The video shows that grandma was not very nervous when the child ran into the elevator, and she was still watching. She doesn't know what she is doing. If the child gets into the elevator, her great-grandmother will get into it. Grandma should block the elevator door with her hand in time and help her get into the elevator as soon as possible.

If MengMeng didn't fall, but was carried away in another elevator, whose responsibility should parents hold?

Through this incident, parents are also reminded that when going out, they must have safety awareness. It is a child's nature that children like to run around. As parents, children should not be allowed to mess around, but must always hold their hands.

Cause analysis of this tragedy: As can be seen from the video, an old woman with a little girl is in the elevator, and the little girl enters the elevator first, and the elevator door closes quickly, keeping the adults out. The little girl was in a hurry in the elevator, jumping around just to find her parents.

Later, the little girl pressed the elevator button on the eighth floor, and when she got out of the elevator door to the eighth floor, she couldn't see the girl's movements because there was no monitoring. As you can imagine, that girl must be very anxious. She is too young to have any sense of safety. She just wants to go out and find an adult. So I climbed out of the window next to the elevator floor and accidentally fell down from the eighth floor. It's really unfortunate, what a pity!

Therefore, as can be seen from this monitoring screen, the adults let the children advance to the elevator, did not have time to follow the elevator, and left the children alone in the elevator, which eventually led to an accident.

Low windows are indeed dangerous to children, but they are not the main factors that lead to accidents. For example, cars coming and going outside are also dangerous. Can you stop the car?

The elevator has both advantages and disadvantages, which is faster than the window. It is because the elevator reacts too fast and the adults don't follow, which leads to the possibility that the child may have an accident. But it is not the direct cause of the child's accident.

Therefore, it is a bit far-fetched to say that these two factors are the reasons why children fall from buildings. But it does not mean that there is no room for improvement, and there are indeed places that need attention.

This incident reminds us: 1. Adults take the elevator with their children. Younger children had better get into the elevator together. If the child can run by himself, he can get into the elevator by himself, but he must be safe. For example, hold down the elevator door key until the child and himself enter the elevator safely; Go in by yourself and block the door with your hand until the child enters the elevator safely.

2. The windows in the elevator entrance area should be as high as possible, so that it is not easy for children to climb up and avoid such dangers. Or that kind of window can't be opened and can't climb out.

3. It is best to slow down the elevator induction, which is suitable for young people. For residential elevators, there are many old people and children, so it will be safer to respond slowly.

It's best not to let the elderly who are too old take care of the younger children. For example, in this incident, the old man must be very old, otherwise he would not have entered quickly without his children.

The girl's accident is really heartbreaking. With such a lively and lovely child, it is understandable for parents to lose their beloved daughter.

(Illustration from video screenshot)

A girl in Zhuzhou, Hunan Province was trapped in an elevator and fell from the eighth floor while looking for her parents. Seeing this news, I carefully watched the video of the little girl in the elevator, and my heart was full of anxiety and sorrow.

The three-year-old girl is still at a loss. When she enters the elevator alone, she is at a loss and is anxious to find her parents. We feel the same way.

Who is responsible for such a thing? I think everyone has a responsibility, parents, developers and property management departments.

We can see from the video that the little girl MengMeng went to celebrate her great-grandmother's birthday with her grandmother that day. A group of them are waiting for the elevator on the first floor. The elevator door opened and MengMeng jumped into the elevator first. Grandma and great-grandmother moved slowly, and the elevator door was closed.

MengMeng was flustered alone in the elevator. She pressed the elevator button at random. She pressed it to the fourth floor first, but no one was seen when she went out. Then she went back to the elevator and pressed it to the eighth floor. Soon after she went out, she fell from the window sill on the eighth floor and died.

Seeing that MengMeng suddenly lost his life, grandma was deeply hit. MengMeng's family held themselves responsible for the accident. As developers, they also have the responsibility, because the window sill on the eighth floor is only 92 cm high, and there is a footstep line below. MengMeng is about one meter tall, and there is a safety hazard on such a low windowsill, which leads to an accident in MengMeng.

From the whole thing, the author also believes that both parties have responsibilities, and as property management departments, they also have certain responsibilities. We know that there are cameras in the elevators of high-rise buildings, and the property department should have someone who is responsible for watching the operation of the elevators on each floor.

When the person in charge finds that the elevator is abnormal, he shall promptly notify the property personnel to go to the rescue. As a developer, it is really impossible to build the windowsill so low that it is easy to bring security risks to some young and ignorant children.

As parents, they also have the responsibility of poor care in this accident. They left a three-year-old child in the care of an old man in his seventies and eighties. The old man and the child failed to deal with the abnormality in the elevator in time. Therefore, parents can't let the elderly take the elevator with their children.

Usually, parents should also communicate with their children and teach them what to do when the elevator is abnormal. First of all, don't panic. Be sure to wait until the elevator automatically rises and falls, and until the adults come to see her.

Security is not a trivial matter, it concerns you, me and him. Parents, developers and property departments should handle it carefully!

Seeing this problem is really lamenting its misfortune and angering its inaction!

I am bored. The child was hit by a table in the hotel and claimed compensation from the hotel. When he was trapped in the elevator looking for his parents, he fell dead. What do his parents do? What did the guardian do? Is the child a hotel child or a property child?

Parents are sent by God to protect their children. When a child is in danger, the first person to look for must be his parents. Parents are busy, busy with what? Busy working, busy making money. Busy working, busy making money? Not only for the happiness of family members, but also for the healthy growth of children. In this way, the cart before the horse, regardless of the children, let two elderly people with mobility difficulties take the children, let the children run around, and push the elevator out of their sight, which can't be controlled. Do you think it's the fault of the property?

Some people complain that the elevator closes too fast. I watched the video, and when the elevator door closed, the grandmother was still watching and didn't care at all. Take the elderly and children to the elevator. Can't you hold the old man in one hand and the child in the other?

Nothing happens for no reason. This child certainly didn't receive the proper safety education at ordinary times, and adults didn't let the child go. It is common sense to look after children and not let them leave their sight. It is common sense to pull by elevator or escalator. Tell children to stay away from windows and edge platforms, pull when crossing the road, and most importantly, don't let children leave their sight.

There are many safe children's songs on the internet, such as this sentence: "Little basin friends, like puppies, hold their mother's hand tightly when they go out." Don't forget to put on a big flower coat, and the crowd will recognize you at a glance. "If you give your children snacks, if you usually educate your children not to wander around when you don't know what to do, then this tragedy will not happen.

It's no use talking at this time. Forgive me for being emotional. The child is too weak. Protecting children is an obligation of adults and cannot be taken lightly. Every negligence of yours may bring harm to children.

No matter whether you are indoors or outdoors, you can't let your children leave the sight of adults. Danger often happens inadvertently. Let's be the guardian angel of our children, and let such a tragedy never happen again! May the little girl go all the way!

Welcome @ jingjingjingjingjingjing, let's taste all kinds of life together, and feel like water has passed!

Yu Tai celebrated his birthday once, but it turned out to be unexpected trouble, which was really hard. A 3-year-old doll, in the moment of ignorance and innocence, fell from the window sill on the 8 th floor because she was left behind by her relatives for a period of time. Facing the crowded elevator, she panicked and asked for help.

This will be a pain in the hearts of family members that will never be erased. If the windowsill on the eighth floor were higher, it would be impossible for a 3-year-old child to fall. If the girl's family had paid more attention, the child would not have entered the elevator alone. But there's no such thing as if. May the dead rest in peace and the living mourn. So who's in charge?

What happened in the corridor of the community is undoubtedly an accident, and no one wants it to happen. So is the developer of the building responsible?

First of all, I think it is necessary to clarify a question, is the residential building a public place? Secondly, does the window sill height meet the acceptance criteria? Finally, what is the root cause of the incident?

I don't think residential buildings belong to public places, that is to say, residential roads are public areas, but relatively speaking, they belong to closed areas with a fixed flow of people, not public places. Failing to meet the requirements of public safety obligations. In addition, the height of the window sill should be checked and accepted, and it is estimated that it is likely to be qualified.

So what is the root cause of the incident? Or the negligence of the girl's family. Although I sympathize with the families of the incident, we can't make trouble without reason. Imagine, isn't this case similar to the stalker incident? If this is the case, the developer should pay compensation, so there is no need to pay compensation for jumping off the building and tailing?

A 3-year-old girl fell to her death. Parents think that the low windowsill on the eighth floor is the main cause of her child's death, but I think the main responsibility lies with her parents.

Things originated in Zhuzhou, Hunan. A 3-year-old girl and her family came to celebrate her great-grandmother's birthday. The child jumped into the elevator first, and then the elevator door closed, so there was no inconvenience for the old man to follow behind.

The girl slapped the elevator door, and the elevator door opened once. The girl went out to have a look and ran back to the elevator. After the second elevator door opened, the girl ran out and was found dead.

Who is to blame? Because the falling place is the window of the stairwell on the eighth floor, parents question that the window is too short, which will lead to the tragedy behind.

The height limit of windows should be higher than 900, and railings should be set up if they do not meet the requirements. The height of railings should be higher than 900. Therefore, if the design height of the window does not reach 900 and there is no protective fence, there is indeed some responsibility, but if all aspects of the window meet the requirements, can you blame the window?

In this case, parents should first review themselves. In the surveillance video, we can see that the old people at home are all with their children, and it is obvious that the old people have poor legs and feet, and they still support their waist with their hands when walking, so don't expect these old people to protect their children well if they encounter any accidents.

Old people need to take care of themselves. How do parents give a three-year-old child to the elderly who need care? This is the carelessness of parents, and their care for their children is not in place.

Alert parents that similar tragedies have happened a lot, and parents should learn from them. Once the child is handed over to the elderly, there will be certain risks, and parents have to bear the consequences of certain risks. Don't put the blame on other people and things as soon as something goes wrong.

Also, when you take your children to the elevator, you'd better hold their hands and go in together. If you let them go in first, or go in later, the elevator door may close first.

Parents work hard, but we can't be careless, because what is common in adults' eyes may threaten the safety of children who are not sensible.

This is a very unfortunate event! As can be seen from the picture, adults got on the elevator with their children. After the child went in, the adults did not follow up in time, which caused the child to panic. They casually searched the floor for adults. They came out from the fourth floor and found no adults, so they got into the elevator and went to the eighth floor. They got out of the elevator and climbed the stairs. The window was accidentally dropped.

No one wants such a tragedy to happen, but since it happened, someone must be responsible for it.

I think the person in charge may have:

1. Adults are mainly responsible for supervision.

In the picture, the child may be with grandma or grandma. Because the old man is old and his legs and feet are inconvenient, he can't keep up with the pace of children entering the elevator, which leads to the closure of the elevator.

Children are too young, have no sense of safety, panic and press the elevator to find, leading to accidents.

If adults go to the elevator first, or wait for the children at the elevator door now, it will not lead to tragedy.

2. There are design defects in the stairwell window, and secondary responsibility is taken.

The window design of the stairwell is flawed, and children are highly neglected. If it is too low, children without safety awareness can easily climb up. And there are loopholes in the closing of the window sash. If it is not pushed or opened, it will be closed directly, and it will be difficult for children to open it, which will avoid such a thing.

3. I also feel a little responsible for elevator design.

The design of the elevator may expose its defects through this incident: for example, the elevator door closes a little fast, and the old man walks slowly after the child enters, and closes it immediately before opening the door. The floor button is located on the lower side, and the child is not old enough to reach it. If she can't reach the button, the tragedy behind will not happen. The elevator door is closed, and the old people are almost at the elevator door. The elevator door is still closed and no one will come in.

Of course, the size of the responsibility has to be investigated by the police, and we also believe that a reasonable explanation will be given.

Through this incident, there are several points for attention on the issue of parents taking care of their children:

1. Adults take their children out to play. Children must never leave the sight of adults. If the child is too young, he must not leave his hand to prevent accidents.

2. If there are grandparents to take care of at home, parents should be good. At the same time, when the elderly are unwell, it is best not to let the elderly take care of the children to prevent accidents.

When parents take their children to the elevator, remember not to let very young children ride alone. For example, some small details should also be considered. Don't let the children get on the elevator first, don't let the children press the buttons, don't let the children climb the window ... Some potentially dangerous things should be informed or predicted by parents in advance to eliminate the danger or take preventive measures.

In short, I hope parents must pay attention to the care of their children, even a little negligence may cause irreparable consequences.

First of all, there is a very special situation in this death. At that time, the 3-year-old girl followed her grandmother to celebrate her great-grandmother's birthday. Two old people took the elevator with their 3-year-old child. A girl was trapped in the elevator because her old great-grandmother couldn't keep up with the children in the advanced elevator because of her slow movement.

And she was slow, not only locked herself out of the elevator, but also prevented her daughter and grandmother from entering the elevator. The behavior of these two old people is the main reason why the little girl stays alone in the elevator. The little girl doesn't know which floor she should find her great-grandmother's home. As a result, she got out of the elevator on the eighth floor, climbed the window of the corridor, got out of there and fell dead. Obviously, this corridor window allows a 3-year-old child to climb freely, and the property owner must be responsible.

Therefore, both parents and the property are responsible for this incident. 1. Now, the property of the incident community has responded to this matter. Parents have filed a claim with the property, and the property is also waiting for the appraisal results of relevant departments. If the property needs to bear certain responsibilities, the property will also actively bear them. In other words, the property will obey the ruling of the relevant departments.

Then, I want to say, isn't there a standard for the specifications of this corridor window? In this incident, there was no guardrail in the corridor window, and the height from the windowsill to the ground was no more than 90 cm. In other words, this windowsill is too short for girls to climb. This standard is obviously wrong. The corridor is the public area of the building, and the first thing to consider is safety. At this height, there is no guardrail, which is obviously easy to cause danger to some people. For example, children, such as mentally retarded people, such as suicides, and so on.

2. Many netizens also pointed out that parents' own responsibilities are not low. Yes, parents have an unshirkable responsibility in this matter. The biggest responsibility is the parents of the children. Because the great-grandmother of this incident is an elderly person, and the grandmother of the child is not young. It is a risk factor that two elderly people who also need care go out alone with a 3-year-old child who needs more care.

On this special day of my great-grandmother's birthday, I don't know why there are only these two old people and children. Children's parents should be together, at least send their children home safely, and then go about their own business. It is irresponsible to let elderly people with mobility difficulties take care of children who can't handle affairs alone. They should first regret their mistakes.

As parents of children, the first thing to do now should be to appease the elderly. Because the child has passed away, we can't hurt the old man because of this. Three generations, because the elderly have some negligence, leading to the death of children, the elderly will have a lot of psychological remorse.

So I think the parents of children should take care of the elderly now, instead of claiming compensation from the property. Because money can't buy back a child's life, and one's own negligence is also a large part of the responsibility. If you don't take care of your children, you don't take care of your old people. Now you can't make any more mistakes. It is the right way to appease the old talents as soon as possible.

In a word, both the elderly and children need our care. There is no doubt about it. No one wants to see such an accident. Parents of children must do a good job of the elderly while mourning. The last thing is to negotiate compensation with the property. The property must be responsible for compensation for this matter. Their responsibility is mainly in safety, and they have not fulfilled their obligation to safeguard norms and standards. However, what proportion of responsibility should be borne still requires professional judgment. In my opinion, if negotiation fails, the best way is to bring a lawsuit to the court, and the court will synthesize the responsibilities of both parties and decide the percentage of responsibility.

A 3-year-old girl in Zhuzhou, Hunan Province fell from the eighth floor when she was trapped in the elevator to find her parents. It hurts to see this information.

It happened at 1 pm on August 28th. Three-year-old MengMeng followed her grandmother to visit her great-grandmother. At that time, when the three of them were taking the elevator, 3-year-old MengMeng went in, and her elderly great-grandmother moved slowly and was looked after by her grandmother. I didn't expect the elevator to close too dead. Three-year-old MengMeng was alone in the elevator, very scared. Well, when the elevator opened on the fourth floor, MengMeng got out of the elevator and saw no one, so he again.

Who should bear the responsibility of family custody? It's too negligent. When getting on and off the elevator, hold the hand of a 3-year-old child. The quick response of the elevator door caused the 3-year-old child to stay in the elevator by himself, causing panic. The child arrived at the elevator on the fourth floor, but couldn't find his parents to return to the elevator and came to the eighth floor. When the child was looking for his family, he fell to his death in front of the eighth floor window.

Most of the responsibility is that the parents' supervision is not in place, which causes the 3-year-old girl to panic and look around, leading to her death.

I hope that when the elderly take care of their children, whether they take the elevator or cross the road, they must hold their children's hands to avoid tragedies. I really sympathize with that 3-year-old girl.