Why didn't Weihai Commission for Discipline Inspection transfer Liu's crime to judicial organs for filing?

[Original] Why didn't the Commission for Discipline Inspection of Weihai, Liu Crime, be transferred to judicial organs for filing 1340496 Click?

2014/1/317: 29: 36 originated from the network.

Why didn't Weihai Commission for Discipline Inspection transfer Liu's crime to judicial organs for filing?

-One of a series of reports on official corruption politics in Weihai.

Reading Tips According to the defender and the insider who participated in the trial, on September 29, 2003, the case of Weihai Wang Fengming suspected of taking advantage of his family Zhou Yanbin's position to facilitate bribery was heard for the second time in the First Court of Wendeng People's Court. During the trial, the defendant put forward in court: I reported the criminal facts of the suspect Liu in the stage of examination and prosecution earlier, and the fact that the Weihai Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection deliberately sheltered Liu was not handed over to the judicial organs for filing.

Prosecutor Zhou verbally replied to the defendant in court: You reported that Liu Xin's criminal facts could not be verified. Weihai City Commission for Discipline Inspection has investigated Liu's original criminal facts and made a decision, and our procuratorate will no longer investigate the case.

In-depth analysis I won't argue for the time being whether Weihai Procuratorate should investigate and deal with the report of the defendant Wang Fengming. Now, the decision made by the Weihai Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision on Liu's crime of soliciting bribes, defrauding and misappropriating financial funds, and setting up private coffers is published for readers.

1. The whistleblower reported that Liu cooperated with Yongxing property legal person Yu Chunwei and other property companies, falsely reported the financial funds for the residential renovation project, and illegally allocated the progress payment from 2008 to 20 1 1. See attachment 1.

2. See Annex 2 for the disciplinary decision of Weihai Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection on Liu.

Judging from the decision of Weihai Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision on Liu, it is recorded in the decision: "During Liu's tenure as the director of Weihai Property Management Office, the Municipal Property Management Office requested and illegally accepted the financial affairs of Weihai Jiaxing, Yongxing, Furun, Kaiyuan and Xiangyun, totaling RMB 528,800; Falsely reporting the project to defraud financial funds of * * * 807,500 yuan; Set up a small treasury of 645,500 yuan. ..... The director of Zuowei Liu Property Management Office shall bear direct responsibility and main leadership responsibility. ..... Give Comrade Liu a party to observe the punishment for one year. "

Is the decision made by the Standing Committee of Weihai Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and approved by the Standing Committee of Weihai Municipal Committee correct? Is there a corrupt transaction of power and money in officialdom?

We consulted the relevant laws and regulations of the party and the state:

According to Article 387 of the Criminal Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), state organs, state-owned companies, enterprises, institutions and people's organizations demand or illegally accept other people's property to seek benefits for others. If the circumstances are serious, a fine shall also be imposed, and the persons who are directly in charge and other persons who are directly responsible shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years or criminal detention. This is a unit bribery crime stipulated in the criminal law.

The Supreme People's Procuratorate's "Provisions on the Standards for People's Procuratorates to Directly Accept Cases for Investigation (Trial)" clearly stipulates in the fourth part of the provisions on the crime of accepting bribes by units that the crime of accepting bribes by units refers to a serious act in which state organs, state-owned companies, enterprises, institutions and people's organizations ask for or illegally accept other people's property and seek benefits for others. Anyone suspected of any of the following circumstances shall be placed on file: 1. The amount of bribes received by the unit is 654.38+10,000 yuan. Weihai Property Management Office, as an independent state-owned institution, asked for and accepted more than 500,000 yuan of management objects, far exceeding the statutory conviction standard. Why didn't Weihai Commission for Discipline Inspection and Weihai Supervision Bureau transfer Liu to judicial organs for criminal responsibility?

According to Article 32 of the Regulations on Disciplinary Actions of China * * * Production Party (Zhong Fa No.200318), if party member is investigated by Party discipline and needs to be given administrative sanctions or other disciplinary actions, the party organization that made or approved the decision shall make suggestions to the relevant organs and organizations; Suspected of committing a crime, it shall be transferred to judicial organs. Article 43 of the Administrative Supervision Law of the People's Republic of China also clearly stipulates that ... if it is suspected of committing a crime, it shall be transferred to judicial organs for handling according to law.

According to China's party discipline, administrative regulations and judicial provisions, Liu's criminal behavior has violated the provisions of Article 387 of the Criminal Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) and other relevant laws and regulations. It should be transferred to judicial organs for filing according to law, and legal responsibilities should be investigated according to law.

Then why did Weihai Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision refuse to transfer it? How does the Standing Committee of Weihai Municipal Party Committee and Municipal Government study the approval decision? Is this decision a collective corruption of the powerful, or is it that the powerful of a certain regime framed Zhou Yanbin for political persecution? Even the governor is entrusted and manipulated by history to help the bigger corrupt interest groups in Weihai. He is worried that an in-depth investigation into the criminal behavior of his henchmen Liu will expose their corrupt behavior. What about trading power and money?

Let's look at what the mayor of Weihai said at the research meeting of Weihai Construction Committee system after he made a disciplinary decision on Liu. According to people familiar with the research meeting, the governor said that he would protect Liu, because his problems were exposed before the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, so we made a decision to protect him. Because the author is not at the scene, it is impossible to determine the original words of the person in charge, but I believe that the leaders of the construction Committee system and the cadres who participated in this research meeting will have inner conviction. Perhaps corruption like Liu in Weihai officialdom is just a "mosquito", which has not reached the standard that CPC Central Commission for Discipline Inspection requires tigers and flies to fight together.

Looking at the investigation of Liu's alleged crime by Weihai Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection, the Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection did not "double-discipline" Liu, but adopted the way of daily questioning. The investigation began in February, 20 12. After half a year's interrogation, Liu was interrogated by the Commission for Discipline Inspection during the day and came back at night to gather the leaders of various property companies to collude with each other on how to issue evidence to the Commission for Discipline Inspection and how to hide and destroy criminal evidence.

During the investigation by the Commission for Discipline Inspection, Liu and his family repeatedly sought intercession from the then director of Weihai Housing Management Bureau. After being rejected by Zhou Yanbin, they threatened Zhou Yanbin, saying, "There is someone above him. If you don't protect my problem, we will let him come down and check on you." During the investigation, Yu Chunwei, a legal person of Weihai Yongxing Property Service Center, obtained illegitimate interests by fabricating false accounts of the projects involved and paid bribes to Liu. He also asked his family to send her a message and ask her to intercede to cover up the criminal facts that he and Liu lied about the project payment and defrauded the financial funds.

Because the "help" failed to meet the expectations of Liu and Yu Chunwei, Liu and his family, under the control of Shi, a former member of the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC), and Wang Shuhua, deputy director of the Housing Authority, collaborated with Yu Chunwei, a property service center in Yongxing, Weihai, to fabricate the fact that Liu's family paid 6.5438+0.5 million yuan for the home decoration project and reported it to Zhou Yanbin. Pay attention to the objective fact that Liu, Liu and Liu have never opened any pharmacies or even adult goods stores.

Article 108 of the Criminal Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) stipulates that any unit or individual has the right and obligation to report to the public security organ, the people's procuratorate or the people's court when it discovers criminal facts or criminal suspects. ..... The public security organ, the people's procuratorate or the people's court shall accept reports, complaints and reports.

Liu's criminal facts were reported by the Weihai Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection after he made an effective decision on August 20 12. Although the Weihai Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection punished him within the party, he should be transferred to judicial organs for criminal responsibility according to law. Because the Weihai Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection failed to transfer Liu's criminal acts to judicial organs according to law, he concealed the facts and the Commission for Discipline Inspection once again covered up his criminal facts. However, the Weihai Municipal People's Procuratorate did not investigate the report, so it replied that the prosecutor's procuratorate would not re-investigate on the grounds that the new crime had not been verified and the original crime Committee had made a decision. Here, I would like to ask who gave you this privilege. Weihai People's Procuratorate refused to accept the report and deprived the reporter of his legitimate rights and interests. Who instigated or hindered you from investigating the suspect Liu according to law? Or was the judicial leader of Weihai City Procuratorate also bought by the corrupt group Stone?

As the defender of Zhou Yanbin's alleged bribery case in Weihai, I found that there were many corrupt behaviors of trading power and money in Weihai officialdom during the investigation of this case by Weihai Municipal People's Procuratorate, just like the corrupt facts of defendant Liang Huajun and witness Zhou Aiying ... I repeatedly reported, reported and accused all relevant leaders of Weihai Municipal Committee, Weihai Municipal People's Government, Weihai Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection, Weihai Municipal Political and Legal Committee, Weihai Municipal People's Procuratorate and Weihai Municipal People's Court.

These reports, reports and accusations have been sent out for several years and have not received any response so far. I have every reason to suspect that there are more officials in the officialdom of Weihai who are inextricably linked with Shi. The reason why the crime against Liu cannot be handed over to the judicial organs according to law is that the fundamental interest lies in digging up the mud and uncovering the radish. The political officialdom in Weihai is completely shrouded in the white terror of corruption. Today, why did the Weihai Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection not transfer the crimes committed by Liu to the judicial organs for filing and exposure? In the future, I will solve the corrupt politics of Weihai officialdom one by one with factual evidence, and also touch the corrupt buttocks of these "tiger" dignitaries to expose their corrupt behavior in broad daylight. Arouse the attention and judgment of all walks of life!