Job Recruitment Website - Property management company - 20 10 Anxian Education Bureau, Mianyang City, Sichuan Province recruited a new group of security guards for the school. Does the school need to buy old-age insurance for security guards?
20 10 Anxian Education Bureau, Mianyang City, Sichuan Province recruited a new group of security guards for the school. Does the school need to buy old-age insurance for security guards?
On 2010-20110, Mianyang's latest medical insurance and social security payment standards (payment base and payment ratio) came out. Detailed introduction of social security payment ratio and social security payment base: detailed introduction of social security payment ratio and social security payment base in Mianyang City: the upper limit of social security payment base: 7 140 yuan, and the lower limit: 1428 yuan (in 2009, the average monthly salary of employees in the province was 2380 yuan, calculated at 300% and 60%). Details of the payment ratio are as follows:
Mianyang City: payment base and proportion of medical insurance in Shizhong District, jiangyou city, Pingwu County, Anxian County, Zitong County, Beichuan County, Yanting County and Santai County. Medical insurance inquiry, medical insurance designated hospitals, medical insurance reimbursement ratio, etc. Social security payment base, social security payment proportion and social security payment inquiry: all of them can be inquired in official website, the local human resources and social security bureau. Payment of basic old-age insurance in Sichuan Province is 20 10. The reporter learned from the Municipal Social Security Center yesterday (2 1) that the city has started to collect 20 10 annual endowment insurance premiums for individual insured persons from 2 1.
According to the regulations, the insured individuals pay the basic old-age insurance premium, and the average monthly salary of employees in the province in the previous year is the base of payment, and the payment ratio is 20%. Due to the late introduction of the provincial endowment insurance payment base this year, the municipal social security center has not accepted the 20 10 individual endowment insurance payment business. Since the announcement of the average annual salary of employees in the province in 2009 on the 20th, Mianyang Social Security Center has determined the new individual payment standard for the insured according to the average salary in the province, and the individual payment for endowment insurance is implemented according to the new standard.
It is understood that insured individuals can choose one of the five grades of 60%, 70%, 80%, 90% and 100% of the province's average salary in the previous year as the payment base of their old-age insurance in that year. Individual insured persons pay 20 10 endowment insurance premium. 60% of the province's average salary in the above years is the payment base, and the payment amount is 3432 yuan; If 100% of the province's average salary in the previous year is used as the payment base, the payment amount is 57 12 yuan.
- Previous article:Is there electronic patrol in the nail?
- Next article:How about Hubei Win in Guangxi Branch of Venture Enterprise Management Co., Ltd.?
- Related articles
- Why do you want to enter China Resources Vientiane?
- Is it legal to have only one car entrance and exit in a community?
- Should the property management company compensate for the theft of the owner's property?
- What about Yibin China Resources Gas Co., Ltd.?
- What are the contents of hospital property safety training?
- Can Tianjin Railway Station take the subway directly to Tianjin Railway Station? How to get there?
- Regulations of Lianyungang Municipality on Elevator Safety Management
- What about the supporting facilities around the dormitory area of Shijiazhuang Silk Factory?
- How do people who don't live in small property houses collect property fees?
- The son-in-law's family of three was killed by the old father-in-law, and the execution of the second instance of the Sichuan High Court was suspended. How did the court answer this?