What about volunteers writing that they are not property?

The COVID-19 outbreak from 20 19 has not been completely controlled. Due to the epidemic situation in COVID-19, our daily life and travel have been affected to some extent. The country has also introduced relevant prevention and control measures, and the public is actively cooperating, so the epidemic situation in our country has been relatively stable. However, with the cold weather, the epidemic situation in COVID-19 has become more and more serious. Hebei province has declared a state of emergency, and the province is actively preventing and controlling the epidemic. Because of the limited manpower, many people will voluntarily sign up as volunteers to serve some communities and strictly control the flow of people in the communities. However, in a residential area in Shijiazhuang, many volunteers wrote on protective clothing? Not real estate? A few big characters have also made many people stunned. Extra? I am puzzled by this kind of behavior. As for the cause of this matter, let's talk about it below.

1. The property sent photos of volunteers without authorization.

The cause of the incident is that the property has posted many photos of volunteers on some platforms on the Internet. In the photo, volunteers are actively doing relevant epidemic prevention and control work, and the staff in the photo are not volunteers. Therefore, many netizens who saw the news think that these volunteers are property, and the residential property is actively doing prevention and control work, which is suspected of robbing volunteers.

Second, the volunteers wrote to deny it.

After seeing the news, many volunteers felt that the residential property was not only inaction, but also sent photos of their volunteers without authorization, which confused the eyes of netizens and robbed the volunteers of their credit. As a result, volunteers had to write a few big characters on the protective clothing and send relevant photos and videos. Even if the property sends their photos again next time, the people who see them will not mistake them for property.

Third, after the news that the property asked volunteers to delete the video photos spread on the Internet, many netizens questioned that the property took credit, but they were very active when they did nothing. Therefore, the property owner said that he had contacted the company's legal affairs and asked the volunteers and related people who sent the video to delete it in time. Not real estate? A few video photos.

Whether the property is suspected of taking credit or not, it is unreasonable to ask others to delete the video photos. Sending photos of volunteers in front of the property is an act of violating the right of volunteers to portrait, and volunteers have written these words without infringing any rights and interests of the property, so there is no reason for the property to ask the other party to delete them. If the volunteers want to pursue it, the property will have to apologize and compensate the other party.