The women's 5 million hot pot restaurant was smashed by the property. Property: I haven't paid rent and property fees for two years. Who is right and who is wrong?

I think both sides are at fault. The woman signed the contract without paying the rent and property fee, and the property refused to let her quit, which was hindering the property from continuing to attract investment; The property also smashed other people's hot pot restaurants at will. If the woman sues the property, the property will lose money. Both sides have certain responsibilities, and the property turns the hot pot restaurant decorated by others into ruins without saying anything. Can the property be responsible for this consequence? Women are closed, and it is not right to refuse to pay rent and property fees only on the basis of so-called verbal promises, so that property is lost. The two sides should discuss it later. If you lose, you lose. Pay the rent. If not, go directly to the court to deal with the matter. No one can suffer for no reason.

Event summary: Ms. Liang from Changsha, Hunan rented a two-story shop in Changsha and planned to open a hot pot restaurant. After signing the contract with the property, she began to decorate. She spent 5 million yuan back and forth, and the nearby shops were sparsely populated. In addition, the cause of the epidemic has not been made public, but she was smashed by the property. The property said that the reason for smashing the hot pot restaurant was that Ms. Liang had never paid the property fee and rent since signing the contract, and the property had repeatedly asked Ms. Liang to handle the matter, but there was no way to come up with this means. The rent and property fee owed by Ms. Liang does not exceed 200,000 yuan, but the property has smashed the renovation of the hot pot restaurant by 5 million yuan, which makes Ms. Liang feel particularly deficient, but both sides "say that it is fair and reasonable" and there is no good way to deal with it.

0 1. Property verbally promises to collect rent and property fees after opening. Miss Liang didn't pay the rent and property fee for two years because the property made a verbal commitment when signing the contract, indicating that there were not many shops nearby at this stage and there were not many people flowing. You can wait until the business is over, and Miss Liang has a recording at hand. This verbal commitment is hard to prove. Without a written commitment, this evidence is not enough to prove it is true. Who knows if that property is just a deceptive trick to trick the merchants into moving in? If Miss Liang wants to fully confirm this statement, the most direct proof is that there is this clause in the contract or a letter of commitment signed and sealed by other properties, otherwise she will have to pay the rent and property fees for these two years.

02, the surrounding shops feel unreasonable and the property is difficult to do. Property also earns money by collecting rent and property fees. Not only that, because the merchants don't pay property fees and don't start business, it will also affect the opening rate of shopping malls. Then the subsequent traffic will not increase, which will bring a chain effect. What's more, Miss Liang is not the only business in this community. Everyone knows that Miss Liang doesn't pay rent and property fees, and other businesses will definitely feel unfair and will follow suit. Because of the ambiguous relationship with Miss Liang, other businesses feel unfair, they can't get rent to make money, and the property income is low. They naturally want to let the merchants pay the rent by other means. If they still don't pay, then they will smash the store directly with the mentality of "I'm having a hard time and you don't want to be comfortable".

According to the law, if the lessee fails to pay the rent within the agreed time, the lessor may sue; In the same way, Miss Liang suffered heavy losses due to the means of smashing people's shops, and she also needs to make corresponding compensation.