Conflict news between property and owners

First of all, it can be clearly said here that it must be the responsibility of the old property, because in this conflict, such a tragic accident occurred mainly because the old property never left the community after being dismissed. Although the community owners have been driving them away, they insisted on not leaving, and even invited a number of unidentified men in black. On this point, netizens are also talking about it. So in this conflict, who should feel uneasy about this incident? For this problem, I analyze it from the following points.

The outbreak of conflict

To distinguish who is responsible, we must first understand how the conflict broke out, which can actually be found in interviews with local residents. The property in this community has been dismissed. According to the contract, they should leave as soon as possible and then let the new property move in, but the property company did not quit for various reasons. This is why the two sides clashed, resulting in the death of the victim during the sprint.

How to treat the behavior of property?

First of all, the behavior of the property must have violated the law. After all, they didn't leave the community according to the contract. In addition, they can't invite people who don't belong to the community and the company to participate in the conflict. Residents of the community said that there were many black men involved in the conflict. At present, the police have transferred all surveillance videos from the scene and launched an investigation.

How to treat this incident?

In this incident, the community owners must be victims, and they should protect their rights and interests through legal weapons, not through this form. After all, it is still very dangerous in this process, and it can't play a good role for property companies. When we pass the class action lawsuit, we can let the court participate in this work and directly order them to leave, which will be safer than the previous way out.