Job Recruitment Website - Property management company - Is the property responsible for the parking in the community being rubbed?

Is the property responsible for the parking in the community being rubbed?

The car was parked in the community and scraped, and the property was responsible. 1. If the vehicles parked in the parking lot of the residential area are scraped, and there is a custody contract and a fee is charged, the property shall be responsible. Otherwise, the property does not need to bear any compensation. Under normal circumstances, only the owner and the property can bear the responsibility. Whether the property should bear the responsibility depends first on whether there is a contract between the two parties. If so, the responsibility must be clear. 3. If the vehicle is parked in the community, the parking place is also arranged by the property. Therefore, if the vehicle is scratched, the property will also bear certain responsibilities. You can go to the property, see if there is a camera, and then ask the property for money. The Contract Law stipulates that property management is the paid property of the property management company, and the property management company has the responsibility to maintain the vehicle safety of the property management company.

According to the Property Management Regulations, the relationship between the property management company and the owners of residential quarters is contractual and belongs to the category of service contracts. This is a basic position of the national law on the relationship between the owners of residential quarters and property companies. In general, there are four main types of services provided by property companies to owners, namely, maintenance, conservation, management and maintenance. In real life, when the owner's property is damaged and the property management company is held accountable, the owner's reason is that the property management company has not fulfilled its responsibilities, and the property management company will excuse itself for whether it has fulfilled its responsibilities.

Legal basis:

Article 897 of the Civil Code stipulates that during the storage period, if the safekeeping object is damaged or lost due to improper safekeeping by the custodian, the custodian shall be liable for compensation. However, if the unpaid custodian proves that he has no intention or gross negligence, he shall not be liable for compensation.