My house leaks on the fifth floor. There is no maintenance fund for the old house, but I have to pay the property fee. What should the leaking property be?

Unfortunately, I tell you that the leaking property needs to be repaired, but the maintenance cost is not borne by the property, but by the owner of the exclusive part.

First of all, property management fees belong to the fees charged by property management companies for providing services to owners of residential quarters. According to the scope agreed in the contract, you can bear some sporadic maintenance costs, but generally do not include the maintenance and renewal of these * * * parts and facilities, so the property only bears maintenance responsibilities at most, and does not bear maintenance costs.

Secondly, according to the Property Law, the roof and exterior wall of a house belong to * * *, and the maintenance cost is borne by the owner of the exclusive part, that is, the owner of the house bears the cost together, and the cost is shared according to the construction area. Since we want to use their money, we must have the consent of two-thirds of the owners of the building area.

Finally, if there is no maintenance fund for your old house, even if you want everyone to share the cost for maintenance, if no other owners are willing to cooperate, it can basically be said that there is no fund to solve the maintenance problem.

In short, there are two ways to solve the maintenance problem, 1, which is more realistic and can be solved quickly, that is, paying the property or other engineering teams to help solve the water leakage problem; Second, report to the local government departments to see if the government has any special treatment for the lack of maintenance funds in your community, such as government advances or government bills, but this method can be said to be calculated on an annual basis, which is basically impossible.

I hope my answer is helpful to you!