Why is there no holiday for Teacher’s Day? Does anyone care?

If teachers do not have a business establishment, they will be in an enterprise establishment, and the enterprise establishment should be an income-generating unit. If this is the case, the education industry will suffer a devastating blow.

Education has become a business, and the first victim is the family. For every family with children in school, tuition fees will generally increase exponentially. Even in remote areas in the mainland, the tuition fee for a child will reach 100,000 yuan a year. More than 50,000 yuan, and the most expensive ones in developed areas will exceed 100,000 yuan. Under such circumstances, many families will not be able to afford to send their children to school, the illiteracy rate will soon rise to the highest level in the world, and the country and nation will soon become the most backward in the world.

Secondly, the most benefited are school directors, and teachers’ salaries will increase exponentially.

Education is a public utility in any country because it is fundamental to the development of a country and nation.

China’s basic education is recognized as excellent education around the world. It is precisely because China's education continues to develop that it has the most and youngest engineers in the world, and it has the most and youngest skilled workers in the world. With these young talents, China has become the first industrialized country in the history of the world. The country with the most complete system has made China the second most powerful country in the world economically.

Some people do not know the blessings in the midst of blessings, and they blackheartedly criticize education and teachers all day long. Even Chinese teachers have not reached the legal income stipulated in the Teachers Law for 25 years. But no matter how much the trolls keep spraying, Chinese teachers are still silently educating Chinese children, because they know that even an excellent nation has some scum, and these scum always look at all problems from their own perspective, and everything starts from a selfish perspective. , except for himself, everyone else is wrong.

Everyone should cherish Chinese education. Some people have neither culture nor skills, and it is difficult to support themselves. They cannot create much value to society. They complain about the world but never themselves. These people are a burden to the development of our country and nation.

The world is such a big place, society is becoming more and more open, and there are many good places. If you don’t like this country, you can emigrate and stay in this country. Who gave you the right to be a troll?

If the staff were removed and managed according to enterprises, and the teachers in the iron-clad schools would not need to engage in moral kidnapping. The school will fire anyone who doesn't like it with just one word. Employees who feel bored after working for two or three years or even two or three months can leave at any time without having to go to the trouble of filing a resignation report. At the beginning or in the middle of every semester, schools set up stalls on the streets to recruit workers, just as the trolls want to see if someone quits and a large number of people line up to want to do this industry. Students can also change teachers frequently, so they don't have to face the same teachers every day for several years.

This question is actually easy to answer. Just go to primary and secondary schools in various places and see how many male teachers are left among the young teachers. This will explain everything.

Let’s put aside kindergartens. As far as primary and secondary schools are concerned, among young teachers today, the ratio of male to female teachers is not ten to one, but perhaps eight to one. What does this mean? One word "money"! We often say: "Economic status determines social status." You see, if the United States were not the number one economically, how could it support eleven aircraft carrier fleets and dominate the world? Can you be a "world policeman" and make trouble everywhere? Can a plane be sent to our "doorstep" every three days?

Similarly, if the teaching profession has high wages and high social status, how can it not attract high-quality young men? Although the relevant departments have proposed: "To improve teachers' salary, teachers' salary should not be lower than that of local civil servants." This slogan has been shouted for many years, and teachers' salary has indeed improved a lot. However, it has never been able to match the "rising tide lifts all boats" of others! Although teachers’ salary seems to be “really not lower than that of civil servants”, what about other things, such as: “performance” and “subsidy”. A teacher may earn 10,000 yuan, while others may earn 50,000 yuan or more, and they will never be able to catch up.

This is the main reason why only teachers take the civil service exam, and no civil servant takes the teacher exam!

Just as some friends said: The main reason why the teaching profession can still attract some girls today is because it has "establishment" and the work is "relatively stable". Compared with boys, it is enough to be able to support themselves and have a stable job, even if the salary is not very high, but it can be stable for a long time. But boys are different. They will face greater pressure in the future, such as buying a house, buying a car, marrying a wife and having children, etc. If you only get three to four thousand yuan a month and don’t have the support of your parents, you don’t know how long it will take until the Year of the Monkey and the Horse. to complete these.

Some friends will say that girls are the same! Is it really the same? Do girls have to buy a house, or do they have to support a family? I am afraid that the vast majority of people will not agree. Even if they do, they are only a very small minority, definitely not the majority! Although we have entered the 21st century, the traditional thinking of most Chinese people for thousands of years, that is, "men should be married when they are young, and girls should be married when they are young" is still there. I don't think most people still believe in this sentence. will object.

Even if there are very few boys willing to be teachers now, I think there are generally three reasons: First, the family is "not short of money" and parents can help their children do everything they need to do. It’s enough for your children to have a stable job; second, they live in a rural area and have no financial foundation, so they think it would be good to have a relatively stable job that allows them to earn a salary; third, if they have an education from an ordinary college, whether it’s higher or lower, it’s better to wait. .

If the establishment of teachers is abolished, the impact on education will undoubtedly be huge:

1. It will be more difficult to find high-quality talents

If the establishment of teachers is abolished Although the teacher establishment can recruit some people to enrich the teaching team, these people are either "ordinary academics" who can't find a good job and therefore "cannot achieve a high level", or they are people with mediocre abilities. , it is impossible to be like now. Occasionally, there will be a few master's (doctoral) graduate students who are willing to live a "poor" life in the teaching team for the sake of this "stability". Some people may say: "If a teacher has a "side job", can he still be poor?" I would like to ask you, there are more than 16 million teachers in the country, how many teachers have a "side job"?

2. It is not conducive to the stability of the teaching team

The teacher establishment has been cancelled, and teachers are "contract workers". Contract workers mean that after the contract expires, it may or may not be renewed. For For teachers, they don’t know whether they can continue to work in the future. Even if they work hard, if their boss (principal) is unhappy one day, their job may be gone. Therefore, they are on tenterhooks all day long and it is difficult to devote themselves to work. In addition, the lack of establishment means that teachers can "leave at any time" and the school can "come in at any time", which is not conducive to the stability of the teaching team and directly affects the school's teaching quality.

3. If the teacher establishment is cancelled, "contract" teachers, if they are not "long-term contract workers", will not have the sense of "ownership" and will have the mentality of "working one day at a time", so , it is impossible to calm down and engage in teaching and research seriously, nor can it stimulate their creative enthusiasm. It is not conducive to the long-term development of the school or the learning of students.

Of course, if it is like a private school, even if there is no establishment, due to the generous wages and benefits, it can still absorb many high-quality young people, especially boys, and many people are also willing to go to private schools. work here. However, it needs to be reminded that working in private schools is very stressful, so you basically eat "youth rice". Very few people can work until retirement. There are two reasons: first, "survival of the fittest"; The second is "no preparation".

As the saying goes: "Education is the foundation of a century-old plan," and the success or failure of education is inseparable from teachers. Therefore, teacher establishment is important for maintaining the stability of the teaching team, promoting the development of education, and even for the country's " "Long-term peace and stability" all play a very important role.

Therefore, the establishment of teachers in primary and secondary schools cannot be abolished! (Since university teachers are high-end talents and can generate their own income, the state’s abolition of the university teacher establishment will not have much impact on university education)

Do you mean to abolish the career establishment? Everything has pros and cons.

Advantages: The people who are dawdling in the teaching team can be eliminated, thereby improving the overall level of the teaching team. In some ways, it is definitely good for the education industry.

Disadvantages: Not to mention Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen, the average salary of teachers in our ordinary provinces is only about 3,000 (less than when they first joined the job. The veteran teacher said that in general, the salary is really average, and they are very good) Get out) Then think about why everyone goes to public schools? It's because you have a system, otherwise who would work for you with this little money?

So since there is no establishment and everyone has the same contract, whoever pays the highest salary can work for them. Is there anything wrong with that? So what does this mean? Good teachers will be concentrated in private schools, and private schools are blooming everywhere. Then you still want to study? There are no tuition fees in public junior high schools, only books, uniforms and other expenses. How much can it cost in 3 years? What about private schools? tuition fee? Accommodation fee? Food money? The fees are so high that you can’t imagine. Can you still study? It has been nine years of compulsory education, and there are still people who have difficulty studying. Educational resources are concentrated in schools with good salaries in big cities. How do you let children from ordinary families study?

I often see many people saying that teachers should not talk about money, but work hard for the future of the country and the nation, and it is a sacred profession. It’s sacred. Are teachers gods? No need to eat or drink water? You can't even eat, so what ideals and services are you talking to me about? ! If you look at elementary school to high school, the proportion of male teachers is too small. In some elementary schools, except for the physical education teacher, there are basically no male teachers. Why are there no male teachers? Male teachers don’t support their families? 3,000 a month, when can I make a down payment on a house, and I haven’t had anything to eat or drink for 10 years?

Suppose that one day there is really no establishment, that is to say, as long as you sign a contract with the head of the unit, you can create an employment relationship, that is, turn the public institution into a factory. Is this feasible?

I have talked to some people who work outside, and they said that for a private company or even a large enterprise, a small supervisor can fire employees, complain to the boss about employee work problems, or even The boss's consent is required to fire an employee.

Who would advocate the abolition of the establishment? They are those who have no skills in school and cannot find a job after graduation, or who cannot teach their children well and cannot find a job after graduation. Looking at other people’s The children have found a job and entered the establishment and are very happy, so they are clamoring to cancel the establishment every day. Maybe they only know that the establishment is an iron rice bowl, but they do not know that the establishment is actually the result of hard work. Maybe some of them really got through the back door through connections, but most of them really got their jobs through their own early efforts.

In the same way, some people complain that the college entrance examination is a single-plank bridge with thousands of troops crossing, and hope to cancel the college entrance examination. However, such people have very problematic thinking. It is not that those who cannot cross the bridge will die. You can just take a lower-level job with peace of mind. There is no requirement that everyone attend Tsinghua University and Peking University. Why cancel the college entrance examination so that your mentally retarded son can also enter Tsinghua University and Peking University? In the same way, will the elimination of establishment staff also allow your mentally retarded children to work in large companies and units? To be honest, even if the establishment is really abolished, people with no ability will not be able to obtain these positions. If you change a hundred ways, your children will still not be able to get these jobs, because the establishment itself is obtained through relatively fair competition. Come.

Why hasn’t the establishment been canceled yet? Because there are many talented people in the establishment. If you say many people use the back door, then how can you say that people with connections and power can ask you to cancel the establishment? In addition, if you can't get into the establishment, they will cancel it. If it is cancelled, and you still can't get in, do you have to kill people with a knife? So this is how things are in the world, just like strongly requesting to reduce the burden on your children. Unfortunately, if you ask once, the burden will appear to be reduced on the surface, but your child will work harder and bear a heavier burden than before. This is the law.

Do you want to work in a big company or unit? You don't want to break someone else's iron rice bowl. Your only way out is to take the employee examination. It's that simple.

If there is no career establishment for teachers, it will be very detrimental to the development of education.

At present, the teaching profession is far from reaching the level where teachers can live a decent life, and their social and economic status are still relatively low. Due to complex reasons such as "not giving lectures, but giving lectures", society does not highly recognize the teaching profession, and there are even negative reviews. This is evidenced by the fact that Teachers' Day has repeatedly turned into a "denunciation day".

Then career establishment has almost become the only golden sign of the teaching profession! Having this golden signboard means having a stable job, stable income and relatively complete security.

Moreover, career establishment is also one of the core attractions of the current education industry that can attract more outstanding talents and retain them.

If the career establishment of teachers is abolished, the charm of the teaching profession will be greatly reduced, or even become dull and boring, which will seriously restrict the healthy development of education.

Looking at Germany, the teaching profession is a very noble profession and is widely respected by the whole society. Their economic benefits are higher than those of their counterparts in other European countries or other domestic professional workers, and exceed the domestic average.

The most distinctive and important thing is: every teacher is a national civil servant. As long as they do not break the law or commit any crime, they will not be in danger of unemployment for life!

These practices in Germany are indeed worthy of our serious consideration and reference. At least when we take measures such as “elimination at the bottom”, “county management school recruitment”, “competition for employment” and “performance pay”, Chengyi Consulting Follow a good path, pay attention to elegant words, think carefully, avoid tossing, avoid "doing bad things with good intentions", and avoid the risk of being absurd and rigid in practice.

Please retain the career establishment that protects teachers, and gradually improve teachers’ remuneration, giving teachers a decent, dignified and stable life, so that the burning red candle can also warm others while illuminating others. Self.

Every system has its advantages and disadvantages. Naturally, there are other considerations when the country implements the teacher establishment system. Teachers are civil servants in a broad sense, that is, national public servants. They should be established like civil servants, public security personnel, tax collectors, etc. This can stabilize the teaching team, enhance teachers’ sense of belonging, and maintain the normal and orderly development of national education.

Whether it will be more conducive to educational development if the teacher establishment is cancelled, you can consider the following aspects.

1. If the teacher establishment is abolished, a contract system must be implemented. Implementing a contract system makes it difficult to implement salary for professional titles, job subsidies, and salary for teaching years. And career stability is also greatly reduced. In order to attract high-quality talents, the country can only significantly increase teachers' salaries. Just like a university, if you hire capable talents to teach at the university for three or five years, depending on their ability, the annual salary can range from hundreds of thousands to millions or even tens of millions, but they won't go. Therefore, when the contract system is implemented for primary and secondary school teachers, the conditions are not mature, it is not easy to operate, and there will be more loopholes. In addition, the teacher establishment system is an international trend. In Western developed countries and Asian countries such as Japan and South Korea, teachers in primary and secondary schools are tenured. After two or three years of employment, if you pass the assessment, you will be transferred to a tenured teacher, and the salary and social status will be very high. This is actually the establishment system implemented.

Secondly, the teacher contract system is not easy to operate in terms of teacher evaluation. If teachers are evaluated based on students' test scores, and teachers focus all their energy on improving students' test scores, it will be contrary to quality education and will seriously affect students' physical and mental health. If teachers’ contracts are extended just because they pass the assessment, the meaning of the contract system will be lost.

Therefore, the teacher establishment has its significance and will not change in a short time.

If teachers do not have a professional establishment, rural schools will not be able to retain teachers, which is not conducive to the stability of the teaching team.

Nowadays, most teachers in rural schools are nostalgic for the stability of the teaching profession, which means "guaranteed income during droughts and floods", that is, career establishment. Even so, there are still some who have resigned and changed careers. Once the professional establishment is abolished, there may not be many teachers left in the compulsory education stage. Can this benefit the development of education?

If the salary of teachers can be increased, especially for teachers in the compulsory education stage in rural areas, it may be more tempting, but judging from the current situation, what attracts people is the establishment. Once the establishment is abolished, there must be corresponding If the system cooperates, otherwise the consequences will be disastrous and the harm to education will be great.

The lack of professional establishment of teachers is not conducive to the development of education.

Teachers do not have a professional establishment, the teaching staff is unstable, and personnel come and go at will. For example, Zhang San stopped teaching after one or two semesters, and Li Si came to take over. Li Si didn't want to teach anymore, so Wang Wu came to pick him up. If you encounter an irresponsible teacher who thinks he will only teach for one or two semesters, will he work hard to manage the class and teach? In terms of teaching, as soon as the children adapt to that teacher's teaching methods, they switch to another teacher. As you can imagine, it is the children who suffer in the end.

Education is a highly professional industry. If there is no establishment, the teacher major may become unpopular. Because besides being a teacher, there are relatively few other employment opportunities for those who major in normal education. If you don’t regard education as a lifelong matter, who would study for a teacher degree?

When there is a shortage of professional teachers, in order to meet the needs of education, other professionals who have nothing to do with education can only be recruited from society. It is often said that "professionals have specializations", and non-professionals fill the teaching team, which has an impact on the quality of education.

Teacher career editor, temporary janitor worker.

Teachers who have just graduated from college are worth 2,400, and school janitors who are on duty are worth 3,000.

Teachers come here for a stable career.

The guard came for 3,000.

If a teacher has no staff and looks at the 3,000 paid by the guard, does it mean he has a low IQ? What are you doing?

Human soul engineer Laurel stops eating as soon as he wears his teacher's crown, and strives to liberate all mankind?

Teaching is first and foremost a profession, or a job. It is better for teachers not to wear the hat of selfless dedication.

Education is a country and a nation’s centenary and millennium plan. It is related to the rise and fall of the country and the rise and fall of the nation!

The purpose of career editing is to stabilize teachers. If teachers are unstable, education will be unstable. Destroying the teaching team is destroying the country’s millennium-old foundation!

The teaching team can only be strengthened!