What mentality should the teacher use to deal with the interview?

First, the problems that should be paid attention to in the interview

Candidates must pay attention to the following questions if they want to successfully answer the interview:

(A) played down the sense of success or failure of the interview

Before an interview, an interviewer feels that he is better than others in all aspects, so he feels that he can rest easy. Who knows that the examiner surprised him in the interview and asked a question he had never heard of. Suddenly, he seems to have lost his soul and his mood is very low. When the examiner asked some simple questions again, he still couldn't get out of the failure just now, and he finally fell into Sun Shan.

Candidates should first pay attention to downplaying the success or failure of the interview, and have a detached attitude of "not being happy with things, not being sad for yourself". If you have such a mentality during the interview, you will be calm. If you only think of success and don't think of failure, you will panic and fail in an interview if you encounter an unexpected situation.

(2) Maintain self-confidence

Candidates have established their self-confidence before the interview, and they should always maintain their self-confidence during the interview. Only by maintaining self-confidence can we always maintain a high degree of attention, careful thinking, keen judgment and abundant energy in the interview and win the defense.

(3) Keep a cheerful attitude.

A cheerful mental state can fully reflect people's mental outlook. Therefore, as a candidate, if you keep a happy mental state, your facial expressions will be harmonious and natural, and your language will be appropriate and fluent. On the contrary, it will give people a feeling of depression and lack of vigor and vitality, and then it will first give the examiner or host an impression of a bad mental state. It can be seen that we must pay attention to maintaining a pleasant mental state during the interview.

(D) Establish the awareness of the other party

Candidates are always in a passive position, and examiners or examiners are always in an active position. He asks you to answer, ask and answer. Because of this, candidates should pay attention to building the awareness of each other. First of all, we should respect each other and be polite to the examiner, especially when the examiner asks some difficult questions. Candidates should not show ugly expressions on their faces, or even complain about the examiner or the host. Of course, respecting each other does not mean blindly catering to each other and acting according to each other's face. Respecting the examiner means respecting his personality; Secondly, don't blindly mention my level, my knowledge, my diploma, my ambition and my requirements in the interview. Too many words "I" will give the examiner a sense of arrogance. So we should use the word "I" as little as possible and put another unit in as much as possible. "Your unit has always attached importance to talents, and everyone knows it. This time so many people came to compete to illustrate this point. " This kind of words is not only appropriate, but also establishes the strong consciousness of the other party, which is very popular with the examiner; Again, the examiner asks questions before you answer. Don't let the examiner talk without asking questions. Let the examiner or moderator wait for you to stop and ask questions. This will not only delay time, but also bring unhappiness to the examiner or moderator. In addition, don't forget to say "thank you" and "goodbye" to the examiner or host after the interview.

(e) The interview language should be concise and fluent.

There are strict time limits for interviews. So the interview language should be boring and to the point. At the same time, the language should be organized and logical, pay attention to the sense of rhythm and ensure the fluency of the language. Don't be vague and hesitant, which will leave a bad impression on the examiner or the host and lead to the failure of the interview. Therefore, candidates must pay attention to the conciseness and fluency of the interview language.

(6) Don't be nervous.

Some candidates are nervous as soon as they enter the interview room, even though they are fully prepared before the interview. Some candidates get nervous immediately when they get stuck in their defense. How to solve the psychological tension in these two situations? We should analyze the causes of tension. This extreme tension is caused by the candidate's timidity and eagerness to win. Therefore, as soon as candidates enter the interview room, they must get rid of the consciousness of "inferiority" and establish the consciousness of "everyone is similar, and my level is the same as others". With this awareness, the tension will be reduced by more than half, and with the start of the interview, the tension may disappear completely. If you are nervous when you are stuck, if you hold the attitude of "winning is the best, it doesn't matter if you can't win", the nervousness will disappear immediately, and you will soon enter the normal interview state, and there may be a state of "another village". Therefore, candidates must be careful not to be nervous during the interview.

(seven) generous behavior, decent behavior.

Bold and avant-garde, heavy make-up, especially men wearing rings, long hair and other unconventional dresses are not suitable, which is inconsistent with the identity of office workers and will leave a bad impression on examiners. After taking a seat, candidates should try not to shake their legs, play with pens, touch their heads and stick out their tongues, which will easily give the examiner a naive and frivolous feeling. Generally speaking, the dress should be dignified and generous, and can be slightly modified. Men can blow their hair neatly, their shoes can be cleaned, and women can wear elegant professional makeup. In short, we should give the examiner the impression of being natural, generous and capable.

(8) Head-up examiner, supercilious.

In the examination room, quite a few candidates can't control their emotions well, and tend to go to two extremes: First, they think that the seven examiners sitting opposite them are knowledgeable and occupy important positions, and they will be laughed at if they answer wrong. Therefore, I am timid and hesitant, but I can't "pour" the goods in my stomach. Second, some candidates have served as student union cadres in universities, organized many activities, and have strong social practice ability, or served as managers and other leadership positions in enterprises, and also commanded a group of people, so they are very confident. Enter the examination room, like nobody's business, and sneer at the examiner. Both of these performances are not desirable, which will affect the interview scores of candidates. The best performance should be: head-up examiner, polite, neither supercilious nor supercilious. We should establish three kinds of mentality: first, the two sides are cooperating rather than competing. The examiner's attitude towards the candidates is generally friendly. His task is to select outstanding talents to state organs, rather than trying to compete with candidates. Therefore, candidates should not psychologically locate who is strong and who is weak. This is not the purpose of the interview. Second, candidates apply for jobs through competition, not begging for jobs from examiners. The key to success in the exam lies in one's own talent and improvisation, which is not decided by the examiner subjectively. Third, examiners come from different industries, with high general education and work experience, high theoretical level and rich work experience. But after all, it is a person, not a god. They have their strengths and weaknesses. Maybe they don't know what you have.

(9) Dialectical analysis and multidimensional answer

Dialectics is the basic principle and method of philosophy. Candidates should have certain philosophical knowledge and mind. Don't fall into absolute affirmation and negation when answering questions, but consider the pros and cons in many ways. Judging from some problems in previous interviews, the focus of evaluation is often not the right or wrong answers of candidates, or the approval and opposition of opinions, but the convincing degree of analysis and reasoning. Listen to dialectical analysis and solve problems, instead of simply jumping to conclusions. Sometimes, we should think from multiple angles and analyze specific situations.

(10) Think calmly and clear your mind.

Generally speaking, after the examiner asks questions, candidates should think about it a little and don't have to answer in a hurry. Even if the questions asked by the examiner are similar to those you prepared in advance, don't answer the questions as soon as the examiner's voice falls. That may give the examiner a feeling that you are not using your brain to answer questions, but memorizing prepared answers. If it is a topic you have never touched before, you should think calmly. Sharpening a knife is not a mistake for a woodcutter. If you answer questions in a hurry, you may be wrong, rambling or disorganized, and grab your eyebrows and beard. After thinking, clearing the train of thought, grasping the main points and answering questions with a clear-cut stand, the effect will be better.

Second, the interview taboo

(A) avoid bad language in the interview

1. Emergency treatment

"How is your treatment?" If you haven't finished the work, you should make an offer first, not to mention that you haven't been hired! It is understandable to talk about remuneration, but to seize the opportunity, it is generally put forward euphemistically when both parties have preliminary intentions.

Report an acquaintance

"I know XXX from your company", "XXX and I are classmates and have a good relationship", and so on. This kind of words will disgust the examiner. If the examiner has a bad relationship with the person you said, or even has contradictions, then the result of your words will be even worse.

3. Improper rhetorical question

The examiner asked, "What are your salary expectations?" The applicant asked, "How much are you going to pay?" Such a rhetorical question is impolite and can easily cause the examiner's displeasure.

4. illogical

The examiner asked, "Please tell me a failed experience." "I don't remember I failed." It doesn't make logical sense for you to say so. Another example is: "What are your strengths and weaknesses?" "I can do all the work." This is also unrealistic.

put the cart before the horse

For example, at the end of the interview, the examiner asked the candidate, "Do you have any questions for us?" The candidate leaned over and started his question: "How big is your unit? What is the enrollment ratio? Excuse me, what position do you hold in the unit? Would you like to be my boss? " When you attend the interview, you must put your position in order. Like this candidate, you just didn't put yourself in the right position and asked questions beyond the scope you should ask, which made the examiner feel very disgusted.

(B) in the interview, to avoid bad habits

During the interview, some candidates' bad habits of informality damaged their image, which greatly reduced the effect of the interview and led to failure. Hand: This part is the most prone to problems. If your hands are always fidgeting and busy, do some actions such as wearing a tie, picking your nose, stroking your hair, breaking your joints, and playing with the business card handed over by the examiner.

Feet: shaking nervously, stretching forward, leaning, etc. Not only does it artificially create tension, but it also seems absent-minded and quite rude.

Eyes: Or flustered, or evasive, but when you should face it squarely, your eyes are distracted, giving people the impression that you are not confident or hiding ulterior secrets, which is easy to disgust the examiner; In addition, staring at the examiner will inevitably give people a sense of oppression and cause dissatisfaction.

Face: either dull and rigid, or indifferent and lifeless. How can such a zombie expression move people? Get rid of it quickly. A lively and moving face is very important.

Good: his movements are at a loss, in a panic, and he obviously lacks confidence; Being slow and at a loss will not only degrade yourself, but also make you look "flat" by the examiner.

In a word, when interviewing, you must get rid of these bad habits, and you should be polite, supercilious, generous, decent and lively from beginning to end. This can not only greatly enhance your image, but also often greatly increase your chances of success.