Recruitment of roast duck restaurant

The relevant person in charge of the store did have some management negligence, because 477 guests who entered the store did not scan the code to register. Many service industries are likely to lose some loyal customers if they make customers feel too troublesome. Although the relevant person in charge in the store did not let all consumers scan the code to register, the person in charge should not be responsible for the spread of the epidemic. There are 1 1 COVID-19 cases in a Beijing roast duck restaurant. Is there any negligence in the management of the relevant person in charge in the store? The following is my opinion:

First, the relevant person in charge in the store does have management negligence.

After the case of 1 1 infection occurred in this roast duck restaurant, the relevant departments investigated this roast duck restaurant. After investigation, it was found that 477 people who entered the roast duck restaurant did not scan the code for registration. It can be seen from the number of people who have not registered by scanning code that the relevant person in charge of the roast duck restaurant does have certain management negligence.

Second, however, as a service industry, if guests feel too much trouble, they will lose many guests.

We all know that hotels are a service industry. As a service industry, if many customers find it particularly troublesome to spend money in the store, then this store will definitely lose many customers. Although the relevant person in charge of this roast duck restaurant is negligent in management, they are also forced to do so. After all, during the epidemic, they also need to open their doors to businesses and customers.

Third, the person in charge of the roast duck restaurant should not be responsible for the occurrence of this cluster epidemic.

The case of 1 1 infection in Beijing has broken the rhythm of epidemic prevention in Beijing, but the case of 1 1 infection is hard to prevent. The person in charge of the roast duck restaurant should not be responsible for this cluster of cases, because the person in charge of the roast duck restaurant does not want an epidemic in his shop.

So do you think the person in charge of this roast duck restaurant is negligent in management? Welcome to leave a message at the bottom of the comment area.