Why don't state-owned enterprises easily dismiss employees?

It is not that the law does not allow him to dismiss, but that employees of state-owned enterprises sign the same employment contract from general manager to general worker.

Managers are also migrant workers. On the one hand, they dare not resign easily, on the other hand, they are reluctant to resign! Second, it is also a violation of the labor contract law for state-owned enterprises and employees to sign open-ended contracts, that is, permanent contracts, and easily lay off employees.

Many young people recruited by state-owned enterprises have not been compiled, but the new young people are also the backbone of the work and do not belong to the group that the leaders want to expel.

For a long time, employees of state-owned enterprises have been established. Unqualified employees can only be deployed most of the time and cannot deprive a person of his identity as a factory. This awareness has always been reflected in the management system, corporate culture and working atmosphere of state-owned enterprises. In this environment, dismissal is not a conventional way to solve the problem, and there is no feeling that "this person can be dismissed if he can't do it". Even if you don't want this person, you are more likely to complain to the leaders or relevant departments and try to get rid of this person.

In the environment of state-owned enterprises, dismissal is a very abrupt, publicity and unusual event. The parties who make decisions not only have to bear invisible pressure, but also face many trivial things in reality.

Because state-owned enterprises rarely delegate power, if you want to fire a person, you may have to report at different levels, and you may have to explain to your own leaders and relevant departments again and again why you want to fire a person without obvious mistakes (poor performance is not an obvious mistake, only exposed economic problems, political problems, style problems, and big mistakes in work).