Which is better, banks or state-owned enterprises?

Whether state-owned enterprises are well treated or banks are well treated cannot be generalized. It depends on what kind of state-owned enterprises, what kind of banks, and what positions they hold in state-owned enterprises and banks.

There are also great differences in treatment between different banks. The best treatment is joint-stock banks, such as China Everbright Bank. Followed by foreign banks, such as Citigroup and HSBC; The third is state-owned banks. Among the four state-owned banks, Agricultural Bank has the best treatment. The fourth is the policy bank, which has the lowest treatment.

The treatment of different positions in the same bank is also very different. High-income positions such as bank president, credit department and senior staff are completely different from ordinary clerk positions in terms of treatment.

The same is true of state-owned enterprises. Different state-owned enterprises have different treatment, such as mobile, telecommunications, Qinshan nuclear power, CSR CNR and other state-owned enterprises, and the treatment of employees is also very different.

The treatment of different positions in the same state-owned enterprise is also very different. The treatment of leaders such as chairman, director and general manager, purchasing department, infrastructure department and other high-paying departments is not different by several grades.

Therefore, it is impossible to judge whether the state-owned enterprises are well treated or the banks are well treated. It depends on what bank, company and position you are engaged in.