Is it sexist to recruit only girls in recruitment?

Article 12 of the Labor Law stipulates the principle of prohibiting discrimination in employment, that is, workers are not discriminated against because of nationality, race, sex and religious belief, and specifically stipulates gender discrimination.

According to the relevant provisions of the above-mentioned laws, unless it is stipulated by the national laws, it constitutes employment discrimination if the employer clearly states in the job advertisement that "only men are recruited" or "only women are recruited".

Therefore, most administrative personnel and civil servants now say that recruiting only women is an act of gender discrimination in employment. After all, in big companies, there are men everywhere in administrative directors and personnel directors, but it is strange that administrative assistants and administrative clerks in the early stage only recruit women. Excuse me, through what channels are boys parachuted into the position of director?

In fact, some people say that only girls are recruited. In fact, most girls are obedient, easy to manage and easy to "bully".

This is why most senior secretaries now either recruit boys who can drive as drivers or women with good temperament and good image (as we all know, as live advertisements or something).

Now many people have a misunderstanding:

1, the company is afraid that girls will have long holidays such as marriage leave and maternity leave, so it is sexist not to recruit girls. Then why not let boys enjoy this holiday? In this way, everyone is equal, and the company will not care whether you are a man or a woman. Anyway, with children at home, both men and women can take maternity leave.

2, sitting in the office, easy work should be done by weak girls, go out to run business, manual labor should be done by boys. Isn't that sexist?