Is it useful to review the special post results?

Basically useless, the following is the announcement of Anhui Province.

20 16 after the written test results of the recruitment examination for new teachers in primary and secondary schools in Anhui province were announced, 872 people from 16 cities in Anhui province applied for 25 subjects, 1307 subjects. According to the established work arrangement, on July 10, under the supervision of the discipline inspection and supervision personnel, the marking unit and the Provincial Education Admissions Examination Institute formed a marking group and carefully checked all subjects. After verification, all subjects found no omission, omission or mistake, and all candidates scored accurately.

The written examination of the recruitment examination for new teachers in primary and secondary schools in our province implements online marking. The marking adopts the mode of double evaluation-three evaluation-arbitration, and each candidate must go through at least two marking teachers for each non-multiple choice question. If the error between the two marking teachers is greater than the preset error value, it will be checked by the third teacher, and if it still exceeds the error value, it will be directly submitted to the marking team leader for arbitration and review. This mode ensures the quality of marking papers, ensures the objectivity and fairness of scores to the greatest extent, and effectively safeguards the interests of candidates.

In order to further ensure the accuracy of the results, in the process of integration, the marking points and technicians of relevant units strictly follow the procedures, steps and requirements specified in the marking work plan to strengthen data verification and recheck. Repeatedly check the results through system check, program check and manual check. At the same time, a large number of statistical analysis of the candidates' performance information is carried out. By reading the marking track, we can view the original drawings in a targeted manner, combine data analysis with key inspections, and strictly check the unified scoring results without any mistakes.

This time, I mainly check the scores from four aspects. Firstly, compare the number of non-multiple choice questions on the answer sheets of each subject with the number of non-multiple choice questions in the grade library; Second, the accumulation of non-multiple choice questions and the comparison of the results of big questions; Third, the accumulation of big questions in non-multiple choice questions is compared with the total score of non-multiple choice questions; Fourth, there is no mistake in checking the trajectory of more than two people in each non-multiple choice question.