# Zhicheng Plaza (Yangzhou) Real Estate Co., Ltd. # Pit, the interview is not good, don't say it in person, let me go home and wait for news. What the hell is this?

this is normal, don't worry about it.

a company that considers who to recruit and who not to recruit is not completely rigid in following the job requirements stated in the job advertisement, and it is impossible to make a decision on the spot, and even if it does, it may not tell you.

For example, take chestnut as an example. A and B have similar qualifications (even if A is a little worse than B, as long as it is not too critical), and their entry, salary and career development expectations are similar. But A has relatives working in the industry, and your family are all doctors, lawyers and teachers. Let you decide who you will recruit. The answer is not necessarily, it depends on the "demand" of your company. If the unit is in a period of development or decline, it is very likely to recruit A, and if the unit is in a period of stability, it is very likely to recruit B.

Therefore, the company will definitely summarize all the interviewed people and look at them one by one, and then comprehensively consider various factors and rank them.

but did you decide to recruit a and immediately tell b not to accept it? No, I usually don't say it, dragging my feet. Because it may happen that A can't join the job for some special reasons, such as physical examination, but the entry information can't be given (fake it), or A can't join the job in another unit when A is called to join the job, …… and so on, there are many special circumstances. If this happens, you must tell B. Congratulations on your entry through the interview. User from Job Q: Li Bo

When a job seeker is rejected, the mind always thinks: Why is it rejected? Why not tell you the reason? I used to be an interviewer, so I won't point it out directly.

1) Because the interviewer is only in charge of one round of interviews and gives comments on this round of interviews, it is not for me to decide whether to hire or not. At this time, it is irresponsible to directly disclose to the applicant that I "shot him".

2) I have to tell the job seekers the truth: interviewers are human beings, and they are also annoyed that after interviewing so many people, most of them need to refuse, which is actually not very good. Believe it or not, it's absolutely reasonable not to explain the reason for refusing. You're just rejected, not the defendant. You must have a reason.

3) If HR says, I'm sorry because your personality doesn't fit our team, then it will take you twice as long to explain to HR. In fact, your personality can be changed, but it is unnecessary for HR.

4) No matter what the reasons for refusal are, in fact, as a job seeker, there will be a will to fight for it, but this will waste the interviewer a lot of time and breath to pester you again. So, don't complain why I didn't give you the reason, because the relationship between supply and demand has been disturbed by too many irrational job seekers. So, just shut up and say nothing.

5) However, when I am an interviewer, I usually say that I will wait for a call within three days. If there is a call, I will inform you of the second interview or employment. If there is no call within three days, I will be rejected and there is no need to wait any longer.

6) Remind job seekers not to ask why they were rejected, but to ask questions from themselves. Job seekers may think that HR is procrastinating or lying, but HR is for their own reasons. Your rejection only shows that you are not good enough or you are not suitable.

7) Of course, if a job seeker feels that there is nothing wrong with himself after careful comparison, he can learn from many interviews. From Q User: Mr. Huang