Social Security In what case the company can not pay the employee's social security

Labor law requires companies to pay social security to workers, most companies will follow the provisions of the relevant labor laws, but some companies in the payment of social security but encountered the situation of the payment can not be. When encountering this kind of situation, many people do not know the correct way to deal with, what is the case of the company can not pay the employee's social security? I explain this knowledge for you.

The company can not pay the employee's social security what is the case

Usually the situation will be the last company did not interrupt the employee's social security, will lead to the employee's current social security can not continue to pay, if this is the case, the choice of the last company to go to the Social Security Administration for the reduction of the staff. In this way, the employee can go to the Social Security Administration to check the social security status of the residence, to see what the Social Security Administration side of the good advice.

Under what circumstances, the company can not have to pay social security for employees, and still legal

Any conditions need to be paid, as a last resort, you can ask the employee to state in writing that they do not require the unit to pay, to reduce the unit's losses.

Workers' compensation insurance must be paid, and several other social security, employee initiative to give up the premise of giving employees a certain amount of subsidies on the basis of the agreement signed with the employee, the unit can not pay.

Employees do not want to pay social security how to do?

1, employees do not agree to pay social insurance as one of the conditions of employment

As employees do not agree to pay social insurance may lead to the occurrence of major accidents at work, the employer has to bear the amount of various costs higher, the social security agency at this stage for the employer to participate in the insurance before the occurrence of work-related injuries and does not assume any responsibility. Therefore, for employees to go out more, more accidents at work, the employer should not agree to pay social insurance as one of the conditions of employment, to fully avoid the risk of work-related injuries.

2, signed an agreement with the employees do not pay social insurance compensation standards

have to admit that some units pay employees lower wages, if the employees to pay social insurance, their own survival situation are more big problems. In this case, if the employer wants to hire such employees, only by the two sides to negotiate the first by the employer to pay for their commercial insurance to avoid certain risks of work-related injuries, and then according to a certain amount of money every year to give social compensation. At the same time, the employee also promised to give up the employer to claim the right to make up the social insurance or the future claim to make up the social insurance costs of the way to bear.

3, and dual labor relations with the employee's original unit to reach an agreement to deal with the occurrence of work-related injuries

If the state-owned enterprises, collective enterprises, laid-off employees of the unit to pay for their social insurance, due to work-related injuries occurring in the new employer, can not be used to avoid the risk of work-related injuries to the original unit to pay for work-related injuries to the insurance. For this reason, the new employer should contact the employee's original unit to reach the intention of secondment, or after the occurrence of work-related injuries by the original unit to declare the new employer to assume the responsibility of the employer to bear the liability of the workers' compensation insurance regulations.

What is the situation that the company can not pay the employee's social security? The company in the payment of social security if there is a failure to pay the situation, you can see the specific situation, to determine the responsibility of the company does not need to bear the compensation problem.