Is it cost-effective not to pay social security in order to receive unemployment benefits?

It is not cost-effective not to pay social security in order to receive unemployment benefits. If you get unemployment benefits, you can't pay social security. You have applied for unemployment benefits, and you can definitely find out if you pay social security. Now that social security is networked, I suggest you stop applying for unemployment benefits first, or you will find a new job, and social security will definitely not be paid.

If you still want to get social security after finding a new job, you definitely need to cut off the unemployment benefits that you can't continue to receive, because you can't continue to pay if you want to get social security, and you can't get unemployment benefits if you want to pay, so this matter is really contradictory for many workers.

More importantly, it must be noted that after receiving unemployment benefits, social security is directly withheld and cannot be repaid in the future. Therefore, if you need to buy a house or a lottery ticket, you must not receive unemployment benefits. Otherwise, taking Beijing for five consecutive years as an example, it needs to be re-accumulated. Although the old-age insurance can be paid off and accumulated later, it is very difficult to accumulate five years of continuous social security.

Legal basis: Article 14

Unemployed persons who meet the following conditions can receive unemployment insurance:

(a) to participate in unemployment insurance in accordance with the provisions, the unit and I have fulfilled the payment obligations in accordance with the provisions 1 year;

(two) the employment is not interrupted because of my will;

(three) have been registered as unemployed and have job requirements.

Unemployed persons enjoy other unemployment insurance benefits during the period of receiving unemployment insurance benefits.