The birth rate dropped, and the professor made suggestions, thinking that it would usher in a turning point in fertility, but it caused public anger.

In recent years, the birth rate in China is not too high. Although it improved when the second child was opened before, the birth rate began to decline gradually one year after the second child was opened. In order to alleviate this situation, the country even opened the three-child policy, but the birth rate is still declining.

In this case, many netizens, experts and so on. There has been a certain degree of discussion, and some specific suggestions have been given.

For example, a professor Zhao in Xiamen said that whether or not to have children can be linked to people's social security and old-age care. If you don't have children, your pension will be reduced, which will fundamentally solve the problem of low birth rate.

As soon as the professor's speech came out, it instantly exploded on the internet, and netizens attacked the professor's speech one after another.

Because the method described by this professor is completely infeasible for many ordinary people, it is unfair, which will also cause greater social unrest and affect social harmony and stability. Some netizens even said that after years of efforts, the country has finally improved the domestic environment to today's peace and prosperity, and this professor's practice will bring the society back to the feudal era full of exorbitant taxes and miscellaneous taxes.

On second thought, the professor's thinking is really "impressive" to be able to make such remarks without considering people's livelihood issues at all.

Having said that, in fact, the reason for the declining birth rate in China is already obvious, not the reason for the pension.

The economic pressure is too great for young people to support.

The main reason why young people don't have children now is actually because people's economic ability is insufficient now.

Some people may say that people's living conditions are not much better now than before. How can you say that your economic ability is not good?

Indeed, people's living conditions are much better now than before, but at the same time, the cost of children's growth is much higher. For example, how much does it cost for children to go to kindergarten?

It is understood that in an early education class in a small county, the tuition fee per semester has reached more than 20,000. At this time, some parents may say that early education classes are unnecessary, so let's talk about kindergartens. Similarly, the tuition fee for private kindergartens in small counties is seven or eight thousand, which is about 15 thousand a year. Do you know the per capita income of a small county?

According to statistics, at present, the national average monthly income is below 1000 yuan, accounting for 39%. 1000-2000 yuan accounts for 24%. 2000-2500 yuan accounted for 7%. In other words, 70% of people earn less than 2500 yuan. Now you think that the number of children attending kindergarten is 1.5 million? This is a person's income for half a year.

In addition, children's expenses are not only going to kindergarten, but also medical care, diet, interest and so on. These add up to financial support that many people can't afford now.

Therefore, a real reason for the declining birth rate is that young parents have no money and can't afford to have children, even if they deduct their pensions.

Change the concept of life, seeking "essence" instead of "more"

Traditionally, many families want to be "prosperous", because in the previous era, the more people there were, the more they could speak in the village and the better their lives, because as long as "one person got the word", the whole family could develop accordingly.

Therefore, the easiest way for ordinary people to "shine" is to have children. If there are more children, there will be no bullying, and there will be more cheap labor.

But the society is different now. Great changes have taken place in people's living conditions now. Every household doesn't need much labor. Moreover, in this civilized society, no matter how many people are in the family, when people are bullied, the state helps to safeguard people's rights and interests. Therefore, it is no longer an era of competition.

Most parents pay more attention to their children's education because of the improvement of their children's thinking realm. Most parents are adhering to the attitude of "children should be responsible for their children as soon as they are born" and try their best to give their children enough excellent resources for their healthy and all-round development.

Therefore, out of a sense of responsibility, parents nowadays are reluctant to have more children. After all, it is irresponsible to have a child and not take good care of it. It is better not to have children.

Insufficient cost of time and energy

People all know that the living conditions are much better now than before, but they ignore the reason why the living conditions are better.

To give a simple example, in the past, when people did business, it took a long time to go to all parts of the country to inspect and purchase goods. But now, people only need to screen online and find the target resources, so they can carry out follow-up work such as sample inspection, which greatly saves the time of running the wrong road and improves the work efficiency many times.

But the improvement of efficiency means a huge increase in workload, so people naturally earn more money now, and of course the work pressure will be much greater than before.

In addition, due to the rapid development of social information, people can communicate anytime and anywhere through a phone call and a video, which makes people's lives more convenient and greatly accelerates their pace of life. Therefore, you will find that you are always busy, and you will never stop at work or life. This is what we call fast-paced life.

In such an environment, young parents simply don't have much energy and time to take care of their children, so many young parents only choose to have one child and don't want to think about the second or third child. Of course, maybe it's not that they don't like children, nor is it a matter of economic pressure, just because they don't have time to love children.

It's nonsense to reduce the pension without having children. Even if this nonsense suggestion is adopted, there is no way to play any positive role in the decline of birth rate.

If we really want to increase the birth rate, we should start with people's livelihood, so that young parents will no longer have financial pressure and spend more time with their children. This is the real solution to the continuous decline in the birth rate. what do you think?