The whole process or information of the debate topic: rich countries should strengthen civil defense first.

First of all, I suggest you go to Baidu to find an article called The Rise of Great Powers: What happened to China?

There are many examples of prosperity in this country.

Just found some previously used materials.

The century-old tradition of China people has always put the country first. Only when the country is rich can the world be stable. However, modern democratic countries are based on people's well-being, enriching the people becomes the basic orientation, and enriching the country is the logical result.

At the beginning of the reform and opening up, Deng Xiaoping made it clear that in order to let some people get rich first, the direction of reform is also to delegate power to the people (including enterprises). It is this change in the guiding ideology of national wealth distribution that has opened an inexhaustible source of power for China's economic development.

Today, with the rise of the Chinese nation, the state regards "people-oriented" and "ruling for the people" as the fundamental concept of governing the country.

There is a famous saying of Guanzi herdsmen, "The granary knows etiquette, and food and clothing know honor and disgrace."

Any way to govern the country must enrich the people first.

Gou Jian's ten-year policy of self-cultivation has also strengthened the people.

The miracle of Cuban education lies in that the leaders attach great importance to it and invest a lot of money. Implement free education. At the beginning of the victory of the revolution, Cuba decided to implement free education at all levels when the national finance was still very tight, ensuring that everyone could go to school.

Science and technology are the primary productive forces? The competition in today's world is the competition of talents. Only a country that pays attention to the cultivation of talents can "all things in the world, people are the most precious." As long as there are people, any miracle on earth can be created. "I remember this is a philosophical saying of the great man Mao Zedong.

In fact, in the past 25 years, almost all countries have tended to increase the proportion of education funds in national income.

Westernization movement, setting up schools

In many crises, only the strong can save the country and enrich the people, such as Huo Yuanjia Vs the sick man of East Asia; Lu Xun, "soul of china" and "Shout" lived only to awaken people's thoughts-strengthening the people.

In reality, the constitution of any country in Africa is not worse than that of Britain, and the system of the Philippines can even rival that of the United States of America. . . But these have not fundamentally changed themselves, nor are they enjoying the feast of the rise of great powers! Germany, which was defeated twice, is the biggest loser in the history of modern war. Not only did it cede territory and pay reparations after all previous defeats, but even the country was divided several times, but it still occupies a place among the world powers today.

1763, King Frederick II of Prussia issued the most famous decree, further stipulating that children aged 5 ~ 12 must go to school for education, otherwise their parents will be fined.

Japan's post-war rise benefited from attaching importance to education and personnel training. Former Japanese Minister Araki Wanfu once pointed out: "From Meiji to today, China's social and economic development, especially the post-war economic development, is amazing and attracts worldwide attention. The important reason for this situation can be attributed to the popularization and development of education. "

According to statistics, from 1870 to 1940, the population of the United States tripled, while the number of middle school students increased by 90 times. The slogan at that time was: "Secondary education opens the door for all school-age youth". By 19 18, there were more than 20,000 high schools in the United States, while in China, a country with a population of1200 million, 198 had only a little more than10,000. It can be seen that the high efficiency, high technology and high output of the United States depend on science and technology and advanced education. Today, the methods of basic education in the United States have undergone several improvements on the basis of Dewey's education law. The slogan of education is "No Child Left Behind", and each state spends 40% of its tax revenue on education. In the 1980s, it monopolized about 70% of the patented inventions, won more than 70% of the Nobel Prize in Natural Science, and ranked first in the total number of Olympic medals.

Counterexample 1:

1876, when the United States celebrated its independence 100 anniversary, it held an international exposition in Philadelphia, with 37 countries participating. At that time, the Qing government also sent an exhibition group. At this Expo, Britain exhibited the latest steam locomotives, the United States exhibited high-power motors and generators, Germany exhibited precision machine tools for processing guns, and China exhibited 27 sets of ear scoops and embroidered shoes made of pure silver.

-the people are strong and rich first. At that time, the Qing court was rich, but the people are strong. Most people have not received a good quality education precisely because there is no policy of strengthening the people. On the other hand, if there is a policy of strengthening the people, the country will be rich.

Counterexample 2:

The evidence of strengthening the people to become rich first, Confucius said in "Wei Guo", get rich first, and then teach it. You can ask, how can we make a group of stupid people rich? How can people be rich if they are not strong? Strengthening the people is the fundamental solution. Rich countries are only immediate interests. Enriching the people first and then strengthening them will inevitably lead to the abnormal development of the country and society, and it will inevitably lose big because of small things and will not last long. For today's China, if we take the road of enriching the country but not strengthening the people, it will definitely lead to social contradictions and it is impossible to go very far. It is the only way to ensure the stable development of society and make the people rich together on the basis of strength. May I ask if Britain started the industrial revolution only on a strong basis, and then it was plundered and the country became rich and strong? Iraq has a lot of oil, and oil is actually money. However, if this nation is not strong enough, prosperity will only make them more backward, and this kind of prosperity cannot be maintained. Maybe the wealth you have now will be plundered by other powers after a while. Therefore, rich countries must strengthen the people first.

Powerful country-> rich country, developing human resources-> economic growth.

For a long time, most economists have made a mistake. They think that only material capital can create wealth, but they don't know that human resources can also become capital and have higher productivity than material capital. Until 196 1, Schultz, a professor at the University of Chicago and a Nobel laureate in economics, put forward the concept of human capital in his book Investment in Human Capital.

Schultz pointed out in On Human Capital Investment that the return rate of human capital investment is far greater than that of material capital investment. At the same time, human capital investment is beneficial to both individuals and society.

How to form human capital? Schultz believes that the key is to invest in people. This kind of investment includes four aspects: education and training; Medical treatment and health care; Encourage labor mobility; Introduce high-quality immigrants and so on.

I have had a question in my mind for a long time, that is, why China is so poor. Looking at history books, China has been the most prosperous country in the world for thousands of years. The prosperity of Han and Tang dynasties is unparalleled. Hundreds of years ago, the wealth of the Ming Dynasty also amazed foreigners. During the Qianlong period of the Qing Dynasty, the Qing Empire flourished, and the gross national product at that time accounted for as much as 5 1% of the world. Today, the United States is unmatched.

Celebrity Sun Yat-sen

The foundation of the country lies in the people.

Qi and Hu Liyuan, whether there is a country with or without a monarch, can't live without people. Civil rights exist in his country. When civil rights die, his country dies.

Broken wood is born in the end; Nine-story platform, starting with tired soil; A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.

Take Cuba as an example. Cuba is poor, but it has a large population. The situation is only at present, and it will certainly develop if you get a good opportunity in the future. The United States dare not hit him. Let's look at Iraq, which is rich in oil, and Saddam Hussein's policy is tyranny and people's weakness. The United States said to fight.

(3) People-oriented

The people only care about the country and the country is better.

Only: only, only. Country: China. Ben: Not at all. "History. Song of five sons

Husband and man, it is foolish to listen to others, but it is sacred to listen together.

Husband: Words are meaningless. Don't listen: listen to yourself. Listen together: listen fully. Saint: Everything goes with the flow. "Pipe? On the monarch and his subjects

Those who serve the country are based on enriching the people and learning the truth.

For wéi: governance. Right: Do the right thing. ○ Wang Fu's Theory of Latent Husband in Han Dynasty. Wu Ben "

People are the root of the country, so we should cherish food and love life.

A reflection of Wu Shu Luo Tongchuan.

The rule of the world lies in the wealth of the people, the quietness of the world lies in folk music, and the prosperity of the world lies in folk music.

Xing Xing: Emphasize virtue. ○ Wang Ming listened to Xiang's "Cautious Words". Imperial articles "

Those who are good at enriching the country must first manage the wealth, followed by those who manage the wealth-Qiu Jun, a great scholar at Wenyuange in the Ming Dynasty (if Kang Gan can also be regarded as a prosperous time, then the "Hongzhi Zhongxing" in the Ming Dynasty will be even worse. And Hongzhi's ZTE is more or less inseparable from Qiu Jun. )