Where is Grandpa Sugar Water from?

Grandpa was originally named Xie Yong 'an, a native of Henan. More than 30 years ago, he came to Wuhan to work hard, did a lot of work, sold a lot of vegetables and did a lot of small businesses. Finally, he chose to sell sugar water, which was 17.

Since 17, his price has only risen once, from 1 yuan to 2 yuan. Two dollars for an unlimited refill. The old man doesn't even want two dollars. Boiling water is free.

Because of its high quality and low price, the sugar water stand was made into a video by customers and sent online, which immediately became an instant hit and attracted many followers.

From then on, all kinds of abuse began to surround the old man. For example, he sells sugar water, does not wear a mask, does not wear gloves, and the utensils are not neatly placed. It is unacceptable to question such health management.

Not only sugar water, but also personal attacks. He said that his children and grandchildren were certainly unfilial when he came out to set up a stall at such an age, which only showed that he had no education. The so-called poor are hateful.

Under the endless abuse, the children of the old man were in a dilemma, and the grandson of the old man cried, so the old man decided to close the stall, leave Wuhan, where he had struggled for more than 30 years, and return to his hometown in Henan.

This is just one thing.

On the internet, all the debates around this matter are basically focused on the topic of cyber violence, which drove away a kind old man.

I don't know if you have noticed that the opinions of Internet giants are surprisingly unified in this matter. Why?

There is a simple reason. The biggest victims of cyber violence are so-called opinion leaders from all walks of life.

As long as you talk, someone will scold you, even if you don't talk. As long as you can be seen, someone will scold you.

Whether the person who scolds you is right, whether the content of scolding is true, and being scolded is supported by mathematics.

One person, one thing, put it on the internet and be seen by 10 thousand people. There are always a hundred people who want to leave a message to say something, so no matter what, someone will always come out and scold you. At least.

There is no reason here, just pure probability.

Probability tells you that everything will happen when there are many people, so cyber violence is inevitable. Unless what? Unless you are forbidden to leave messages.

No messages, no malicious messages. As long as there is news, there will be malicious news.

Therefore, I say that the big V's are the real victims of cyber violence, and they are the people who live on the cusp every day.

But are the victims of cyber violence just victims? No, of course, there are two sides to one thing. A person's greatest weakness is often his greatest strength, and so is everything.

The victims of cyber violence may also be the beneficiaries of cyber violence. As long as you are willing to join this industry, the transformation between victims and beneficiaries is often only a moment.

This old man is a simple victim because he is not an Internet practitioner. If he is willing to be an online celebrity, he will soon find that the person who scolds him is the one who loves him.

This thing doesn't distinguish between loving you and hating you. Love and hate are streams, there is no difference.

In fact, if you do a statistic, you will find that those black powders are all good powders. From the perspective of money, 10% black powder may create 70% of your income.

Why? The reason is simple, because black powder is the most controversial.

Someone praises you, but you don't necessarily respond. Someone scolds you. Usually some people will not only respond, but also refute.

One in and one out, two calories. Who made it happen? It is the common people who scold you.

Some people who don't know here will ask me why I've never seen anyone attacking me in our message area.

Of course, it's just that the assistant blocked it and you didn't see it.

Under the strategy of pure traffic operation, it is wise to attack your message or even give the other party a top.

Because doing so will tease other black powder who have not left a message, they will think that their attack is effective and will be eager to try.

On the other hand, it will cause resentment of iron powder. They will surface to protect bloggers and launch a counterattack. After the war between the two sides was lifted by the blogger, he could collect traffic.

This is the skill of self-media operation, and many big V's play like this.

The reason why I am useless is simple, because this kind of struggle between readers can bring traffic, but it will also make my point of view irrelevant.

Think about it. If the class is in chaos and everyone scolds each other, will anyone remember what the teacher just said?

The positioning of the media is different, and the big V's are mostly emotional. If you look closely, you will find that they are not really thinking. They are just emotional provocateurs, just like digging holes in BBS era waiting for you to irrigate.

So they want to provoke and scold each other, which is good for them.

And we are the official WeChat account with strong opinions. Basically, I'm talking and you're listening. Not only that, I am still trying to guide readers to focus. Just listen to this direction, follow it and don't get separated.

WeChat official account, with this orientation, naturally do not want the following group of people PK. Flow is important, and concentration is also important. The different positioning made me abandon the former.

So it's not that we haven't been violently attacked by the internet, but that all kinds of abusive opinions have not been released, but I will still mention them from time to time in chat.

These attacks on me, however varied, are essentially the same meaning.

In a word, you and I have different expectations, or you don't meet my expectations.

As for why I don't refute, I won't take it seriously. The reason is simpler, because why should I think the same as you?

Grandpa Sugar Water, after all, still cares. If you care, you lose.

In his heart or essence, he still regards everyone's evaluation of him as a very important life indicator, which is the biggest difference between him and those big V who also suffer from cyber violence.

He still wants to be recognized and praised, so when netizens question his motives, he will be sad and disappointed.

Suffering from the same cyber violence, those big V's are intentional. They know that the more violent you are, the more I will benefit, so while denouncing cyber violence, they enjoy it. Come on, let the storm come harder.

But this old man is obviously emotional, and whoever gives him feelings will inevitably get hurt. It turns out that the internet is a place where you can only stay away from your kidney but not your heart.

And to be honest, the image of this old man is hard to survive on the Internet.

Because he is a positive image. The positive image is easy to collapse. Why? Because the better you are, the higher expectations others have for you and the meaner you are.

You see, another reason why I am seldom scolded is that I can't be scolded. The so-called earth wall cannot be dirty.

Man, if you stand tall, there will always be someone who wants to pull you down. If you are low enough, you will lie at the bottom of the pit and no one can pull you down. You can't go any lower.

Many people will be scolded for loving money, but almost no one will scold me for loving money.

As a professional investor, it is your duty to love money, and not to love money is unprofessional.

Many people will call me hypocritical, but few people say so.

No one is more vain than a day trader.

In the eyes of people who are entities, those who engage in real estate are virtual, those who engage in real estate are virtual, and those who invest in enterprises are virtual.

When Buffett didn't donate to the Gates Foundation, Gates denounced the bus as a boring person who only knew speculation.

However, in Buffett's eyes, day trading is a thief. He has repeatedly denounced that high-frequency trading is essentially a group of unscrupulous thieves who have not created any value and stolen human wealth.

Therefore, as a member of an unscrupulous thief, I naturally have many advantages and many things need not be explained.

You see, no one has ever asked me why I don't want to solve key problems and live up to my times. At that time, the technology was not bad. They are all architects of Party A.. ..

You see, no one has ever asked me why I don't want to really bring out a team that can work hard in the technology industry or make products handed down from generation to generation.

No one has ever asked me. I went to graduate school in this major, and then I gave up and concentrated on doing meaningless things. Unfortunately, it's not a pity.

No one will question me. Gates is a capitalist in the eyes of the public, Buffett is a vain and meaningless person in the eyes of Gates, and day traders are just a group of disgusting thieves in Buffett's eyes.

You can imagine what a high-frequency trader looks like in the eyes of the public. Almost as good as a pile of incense.

Who would have thought there would be a lump? If expectations are low enough, fewer people will scold you. Your own psychological burden is also small. In fact, if you do a little good, even if you do a few less bad things, others will look at you with new eyes and praise you.

Like many readers, you praised my patriotism, which made me a little embarrassed.

They say I am patriotic because I am in the international market, so-called stealing American things. So they think I'm Robin Hood.

If a thief is praised, there is no one.

The reason why I do international marketing is simple. The most important reason is that many domestic varieties do not support day trading.

Understand? It's not that I don't steal from you, it's just market constraints. You think too much. I'm not as good as you think.

The second reason is that rabbits don't eat grass beside their nests. High-frequency trading will inevitably lead to litigation. Generally speaking, the place of litigation and the place of residence are the best two places, and extradition is not allowed.

I have read some stories about wealthy immigrants. I won't tell you all what a person loves and believes, which is closely related to his own specific situation.

For example, if you make a fortune doing business in China, there will inevitably be many problems left over in the process. Sometimes, he just wants to avoid problem immigration. Because he knows a lot of things that he can't pass.

On the other hand, if a person makes a fortune in the international market and there are many problems left over in the United States, he definitely does not want to go abroad, and he may be detained if he goes there.

I played the so-called Robin Hood in history. He is not a soldier. He stole the count's wealth and was afraid of settling accounts after autumn, so he gave110 to the villagers in exchange for hiding his whereabouts.

This is an ecological chain, not a moral orientation.

Similar ecological chains are very common. Many businessmen have done many disgraceful things, such as returning home, building bridges, paving roads and building schools. Why? He just wants the protection of the villagers.

As you can see, human nature is complex and simple. If you can't figure it out, it's complicated. It'll be easy when you figure it out.

Obviously, this old man is the one who can't figure it out. He can't accept that there are all kinds of birds in the forest. There is always a malicious person in a hundred people.

So what's wrong with closing the booth? He can't make money by doing such a thing himself. He is getting old. Isn't it nice to live comfortably for two days?

I don't think he was forced to leave, he just wanted to forget it. The world is not worth it. Being in the position of moral benchmark is even more uncomfortable. Borrowing a donkey from the slope is the best time to quit.