Can new rural resettlement houses be bought and sold?

With the continuous development of the national economy and the continuous attention to rural undertakings, new countryside has emerged in many places, and the new rural policy is also an important embodiment of the country's continuous concern about the three rural issues. These new villages, I am a new village formed after the original village was demolished and merged, which not only beautified the whole rural environment but also promoted the rural economic development. So many people want to ask, can the new rural resettlement houses be bought and sold as a means to resettle farmers? Let's take a look together. Strictly speaking, the resettlement houses in rural areas are for the relocated people. If they get full property ownership, they can sell it. If you don't get full ownership of the property, you can't sell it. The transaction risk is the first, and the rising house price is easy to induce the seller to default. According to the House Management Measures, the seller can only transfer the house to the buyer after five years from the date of obtaining the real estate license. In this long five-year period, no one can predict the trend of house prices. When the house price rises sharply, it is entirely possible for the seller to sell the house to a higher bidder again. In some extreme cases, a set of demolition and resettlement houses may have been bought and sold for more than a dozen times before the final transfer. The buyer of the demolition and resettlement house can't get full protection from the sales contract. The ownership of the house ultimately depends on the transfer situation: whoever finally obtains the ownership certificate of the demolition and resettlement house is the owner of the house, and it doesn't matter whether it is the first buyer. Many buyers of resettlement houses think that the sales contract has been signed, the house price has been paid and the house has been renovated. Even if the seller defaults, can he still kick me out of the house? In fact, the purchaser who has completed the transfer formalities will obtain the ownership of the house according to law and have the right to ask the original purchaser to move out of the house for demolition and resettlement. Second, the buyer can't get the compensation benefits of the second house demolition. In the process of urban expansion, it is not uncommon for some newly-built resettlement houses to face demolition again. At this time, the compensation paid by the demolition department is often higher than the transaction price of the demolition resettlement house, so there is often a dispute between the buyer and the seller in the distribution of the compensation for demolition: the seller believes that the house has not been transferred, and the compensation for demolition certainly belongs to the seller; The buyer thinks that the house payment has been fully settled and he has moved in, so the compensation for demolition should belong to the buyer. Legally speaking, the compensation for demolition should still belong to the seller: on the one hand, the compensation for demolition belongs to the deformation of the demolished house, not to the fruits. Deformed objects are usually built on the basis of losing the original; These fruits usually do not depend on the loss of the original, on the contrary, they are usually produced in the presence of the original. The rule that the ownership of fruits changes with delivery cannot be applied to the compensation for demolition. On the other hand, the compensation for demolition is obtained by the seller based on the provisions of the law, not without legal basis, so it does not belong to unjust enrichment. Therefore, the seller is still entitled to compensation for demolition after receiving the purchase price. Third, it is easily influenced by uncertain factors. If the transaction time is too long, many unforeseen factors will cause disputes. In one case, the seller died before the transfer was completed, and the seller's successor objected to the sales contract, thinking that the price sold to the buyer was too low. In order to complete the transfer, the buyer should negotiate with the heir he has never met, and then intervene in the seller's housework. In the end, the buyer chooses to solve the problem through litigation, but faces new problems. The seller has several heirs, some of whom have settled overseas. In this case, the court will have to serve it through diplomatic channels. As for how long it will take to complete the delivery, it is difficult to predict, and the lawsuit will drag on, and the buyer will not get the property certificate of the house. In addition, changes in national macro-control policies such as taxation and credit will also make buyers and sellers re-evaluate the gains and losses of the transaction. Property buyers should not only see its relatively low price, but also see its special risks when purchasing demolition and resettlement houses. It is not wise to buy a demolition and resettlement house, because it takes too long to successfully complete the transaction, and the potential legal risks are hard for anyone to foresee and avoid. The buyer only gets a limited price difference, and the whole house may be lost. After understanding the relevant policies and laws of the country, we can know that the new rural resettlement houses are houses given to farmers by the state or the government. If farmers have not obtained all the ownership of this resettlement house, it is impossible to sell it, and there are certain dangers and risks in the sale of new rural resettlement houses. Because the buyer does not know the seller's ownership of the new rural resettlement house, it is likely that some problems in the process of buying a house will be discovered after selling the house.