48 batches of milk powder are on the black list

Many parents may have heard of the statement "48 batches of blacklisted milk powder", so many parents want to know what is going on, and that this 48th batch of milk powder is on the blacklist. Which milk powders and companies are there? Let me tell you below.

The 48 batches of milk powder on the black list are actually the list of problematic milk powders obtained by the State Food and Drug Administration in 2015 after sampling inspections of infant formula milk powder in 2014. At that time, products from 100 companies across the country were sampled and inspected, including some imported products. As many as 1,565 samples were sampled, and 48 batches of unqualified products were found.

Although it is a 2015 milk powder blacklist, we can still see the credibility of some companies, so this list still has certain reference value. The following is a detailed list of the 48 batches of milk powder in question.

There are 11 batches with higher risk:

Shanxi Gucheng Dairy Group Co., Ltd. has 3 batches of samples with aflatoxin M1 exceeding the standard;

Detected in 5 batches of milk powder samples from Beden (Fujian) Infant Nutrition Co., Ltd., Baicheng Longdan Dairy Technology Co., Ltd., Shanxi Gucheng Dairy Group Co., Ltd., Heilongjiang Huadan Dairy Co., Ltd., and Heilongjiang Nongken Multi-York Dairy Co., Ltd. Enterobacter sakazakii;

One batch of samples from Shaanxi Jinniu Dairy Co., Ltd. was detected with excessive nitrate;

Two batches of samples from Yangling Shengfei Dairy Co., Ltd. were detected with bacterial colonies The total number exceeds the limit.

12 batches of general risk:

Gabili (Hunan) Food Co., Ltd., Heilongjiang Nongken Yingbo Warwick Dairy Co., Ltd., Heilongjiang Nongken Longwang Food Co., Ltd., Heilongjiang Nongken Vitamin C, linoleic acid and ?-linolenic acid in samples from Zhengyuan Dairy Co., Ltd., Heilongjiang Aolezi Dairy Co., Ltd., Qinggang Branch of Harbin Ruduobao Dairy Co., Ltd., and Shaanxi Dingbian County Dairy Industrial Co., Ltd. Ratio, chlorine, manganese, selenium, iron, calcium and other nutrients indicators do not meet the standards.

There are no food safety risks, but there are 21 batches with label values ??that are inconsistent with the actual value:

Baicheng Longdan Dairy Technology Co., Ltd., Heilongjiang Fuyu Star Food Co., Ltd., Heilongjiang Huadan Dairy Co., Ltd., Heilongjiang Red Star Group Co., Ltd., Heilongjiang Nongken Longwang Food Co., Ltd., Heilongjiang Aolezi Dairy Co., Ltd., Harbin Prince Dairy Industry Co., Ltd., Shaanxi Shengtang Qinlong Dairy Co., Ltd., Shaanxi Youlish Dairy Co., Ltd. Samples from responsible companies, Ruoergai Plateau Zhibao Yak Dairy Co., Ltd., Shaanxi Meiliyuan Dairy Co., Ltd., Hunan Changsha Yahua Dairy Co., Ltd., and Jilin Feihe Aibite Dairy Co., Ltd. were found to contain sodium, chlorine, manganese, zinc, The contents of nutrient indicators such as copper, iron, vitamin B1, vitamin C, and taurine do not match the values ??indicated on the labels.

Among the imported milk powder samples for random inspection, there are two batches with general risks:

Holle brand milk powder originating in Austria distributed by Wuhan Meistong, and original brand milk powder distributed by Fuzhou Dirui Trading Bolufen brand milk powder produced in Spain.

There are no food safety risks in imported milk powder, and there are two batches of labels with inconsistent values:

Tanilac (R) originating in Switzerland distributed by Beijing Baihui Intelligent Industry Technology Co., Ltd. ) brand milk powder, Mamile brand milk powder originated in the Netherlands distributed by Shenweijianyi Trading (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.