Why do recruiters now look at academic qualifications rather than work experience?

▲? Education is not the only criterion, but it is the fastest and most effective screening method.

Personnel recruitment is not as easy as many people think.

In order to recruit several positions, the HR Commissioner will receive hundreds of resumes in his mailbox.

In these hundreds of thousands of resumes, we need to go through some screening methods to select talents suitable for recruitment positions.

According to the time limit of recruitment, most HR first looks at academic qualifications.

Why?

Because screening academic qualifications is the fastest, most labor-saving and most effective screening method.

1. Through the final education, the comprehensive quality of the applicant can be effectively judged.

There is no denying that there are differences in the comprehensive quality between undergraduates and junior college students. Not big, but it does exist.

The same is true for graduate students relative to undergraduates.

So it's not about work experience, but about academic qualifications first. If you don't meet the corresponding academic requirements, your later work experience will not be scrutinized.

It is natural for people to spend more years in college, learn relevant professional knowledge and have high comprehensive quality.

This is the cruelty of reality.

Education is not everything, but without education, it is suffering in all aspects.

2. Through academic qualifications, the level of graduate school can effectively judge the applicant's learning ability.

If you want to enter a good university, you need to get good grades in the college entrance examination.

The results of the college entrance examination depend on three years' hard work in high school, and also represent the individual's learning ability.

The better the university, the more it can represent your learning ability.

In the workplace, learning ability represents a quick entry and represents the future development potential.

Although education can't prove your learning ability 100%, it is the case in most cases.

It's not that you don't look at your work experience, but that your experience has not reached the point where you can make up for your lack of education.

Because of various circumstances, you failed to enter the university and entered social work early.

If you apply for a position and want to compete with college graduates of the same age, it is not without opportunities.

At this time, you need to rely on rich social experience and various work experiences to win.

For example, if you want to apply for an engineering project manager,

You came out to work before you went to college, and accumulated 8~9 years of experience in engineering construction projects, trying to climb up from the bottom.

If you are the same age, you have 4 to 5 years of experience after graduating from college. At this time, the job interview and assessment should test some actual conditions related to the construction site and engineering specialty.

You can use your 9 years of accumulated experience in the same industry to completely overwhelm applicants of the same age and win the position of project manager.

Sometimes, it doesn't matter if you don't have a degree, in case you don't try to waste time.

As long as you work hard enough and have no education, you can still get ahead.

Don't complain about personnel recruitment, just look at academic qualifications rather than experience.

That's because your experience is not enough to make up for your lack of education, and your experience is not that excellent.

...

Studying hard and getting into a good university is the best shortcut to success in life.

It doesn't matter if you don't have a degree.

However, you have to work several times harder than others to achieve it.