Can you prove that major or major is more conducive to personal development?

I found some information, I hope it will help you. Pursuing a major is more conducive to personal development. First of all, the trend of personal development and social development is dialectical unity. The brief history of social development tells us that social development is spiraling, while social division of labor is developing in a crown. Under the condition of modern society, the division of labor is more and more detailed, and the knowledge structure corresponding to the division of labor is also more and more detailed. Therefore, the profession is also developing in a more complicated direction, so the refinement of social division of labor directly needs professionals. Obviously, the trend of social development provides a broader space for us to realize our own value, so seeking specialization is more conducive to our personal development.

Second, whether seeking a major or expertise is just a means, the foothold and destination are the same, which is to achieve the purpose of personal development. When individuals come into contact with social practice, it is always determined by social needs which way is more effective. Obviously, today's society needs talents with professional skills and abilities. Only with professional skills and abilities can we meet social practice. Today's society needs integration and innovation, so who can better meet this demand? In our opinion, based on having higher professional technical skills, the further integration of released and generated energy is far from the simple superposition of erudition, and the height reached is by no means achievable by erudite people, so the integration needs to be more professional; Only through in-depth research in professional fields can innovation be carried out. The so-called innovation of knowledgeable people only solves a differentiated problem, but professionals can carry out revolutionary innovation. Therefore, it is easier to meet social needs and more conducive to personal development.

Third, the individual's own characteristics determine that seeking specialization is more conducive to personal development. Everything in the world has its own laws of change and development, and so does the development of mankind. Both cognitive psychology and behaviorism science believe that there are differences in individual physiological and psychological mechanisms, including perception, memory, representation, tendency and so on. This difference determines that we must study according to our own characteristics and make use of our own psychological characteristics, so that it is easier to achieve the greatest achievement and best development that individuals can achieve in some fields, and then realize personal value. Therefore, rational thinking with a scientific attitude and seeking specialization are more in line with psychology and personal development. The south emphasizes ability, the north emphasizes diploma, and the south develops faster than the north, which shows the problem.

The most important point is that professional knowledge is not small, and knowledge is not wide. The difference lies in the attitude of striving for perfection and generalizing.

I think: professionals can better adapt to social competition.

All-rounder refers to the all-round development of talents, and is a compound talent with a wide range of knowledge.

Professionals refer to people who have more professional knowledge and more skilled professional skills in a certain professional field on a certain knowledge platform. When discussing who is more suitable for social competition, we need to pay attention to the fact that generalists and professionals are two concepts, each with its own advantages and disadvantages, which makes our debate very meaningful. Moreover, these two concepts have their own emphasis, one in the whole and the other in the special. Among them, there is a concept of specialization and multifunction, but this should not be the focus of debate. Omnipotence is unrealistic and impossible. In this debate, everything is about profoundness. What we want to demonstrate is that a deep understanding of knowledge in a certain field is more suitable for social competition than extensive knowledge. Here we are not comparing "many" and "one", but comparing "all" and "essence".

The so-called adaptation to social competition lies in adapting to the needs of society. Only those who meet the needs of society are more competitive. In today's information explosion era, the demand for talents is getting higher and higher. We think professionals are more suitable for social competition.

First, with the refinement of social division of labor, the knowledge structure corresponding to the division of labor is becoming more and more detailed, so the specialty is also developing in a more complicated direction. The demand for talents tends to be more detailed and higher, so the demand for talent specialization is very obvious.

Second, professionals with professional knowledge and skills in a certain field will be more attractive than all-rounders. In the compound cross field, the final research and implementation is also realized in a single field. Because the generalist's personal work efficiency is low, focusing on the personal field is more conducive to realizing social value.

Third, adapting to social competition lies in adapting to social needs, and the relationship between talents and society is a two-way choice. All-rounder has a wide range of choices, but it can only be selected once, which is uncertain. "Opportunities can be met by everyone, but not everyone can cash them." All-round and extensive is just a show-off capital, and a modern society with a detailed division of labor needs sophisticated talents, that is, professionals.

To sum up, we think professionals are more suitable for social competition.

Does modern society need generalists or professionals more? It depends on who can better promote the benign operation and sustainable development of modern society. The so-called professional talents refer to talents with richer professional knowledge and more skilled professional skills in a certain professional field. The so-called generalist is a talent with broad knowledge platform, rich knowledge reserves and diverse skills. Simply put, a generalist means comprehensive knowledge, diverse skills and strong ability to adapt to changes.

All right! Talking about modern society, benign operation and sustainable development are the primary requirements of modern society. A high degree of division of labor is a remarkable feature of modern society. However, a high degree of integration is a major and urgent requirement of modern society. Social division of labor has caused refinement, but if the fragments produced by refinement are not integrated, where can we find the benign operation and sustainable development of the whole society? Every step of social division of labor brings higher integration requirements. Is it necessary to communicate between different divisions of labor at this time? Is it necessary to integrate different disciplines? Then, a generalist with a broad knowledge platform and rich knowledge reserves and a specialist with only a single skill and knowledge can better communicate between different divisions of labor? Who can fully integrate different disciplines? Therefore, the benign operation and sustainable development of modern society need more generalists!

Second, let's look at the motive force of modern social development-innovation. From the synthesis of ancient science to the differentiation of modern science, and then to the new synthesis of today's science. The situation of strict barriers and fragmentation of disciplines no longer exists. What we see is the exchange, blending and infiltration of various disciplines. Today, the significance of innovation lies in the meeting, exchange, integration and synthesis of different ideas, different fields and different disciplines here. So is the generalist with wide caliber and thick foundation more innovative than the generalist with narrow caliber? Therefore, the breakthrough and progress of modern society need more generalists.

Thirdly, let's take a look at a realistic problem in modern society-the frequent flow of talents. Americans have to change jobs seven or eight times in their lives. With the continuous progress of China's market economy and the deepening of industrial structure adjustment and professional structure adjustment, we find that the flow of talents across industries and fields is becoming more and more frequent. At this time, is a generalist with multiple skills better able to adapt to the changes of modern society than a generalist with only one skill? To sum up, we find that whether from a macro social perspective or a micro personal perspective, it can be proved that what modern society needs more is a generalist!

Finally, I have two points to make:

First, we say that everyone has a special post, so we can't think that a person who has done the same job in a certain period of time is special, otherwise there will be no generalists in the world, right?

Second, we say that everyone has an advantageous major, and we can't say that with an advantageous major, this person is a specialist, otherwise there will be no generalist in the world.

Analysis of "All-rounders are more suitable for social competition" I. Understanding of our viewpoint;

Whole body:

In this rapidly changing social condition, the generalist with wide caliber and thick foundation is stronger than the specialist with narrow caliber.

Can better adapt to today's rapidly changing social competition.

Examination questions:

1, talent: a person with a certain specialty. (Modern Chinese Dictionary, 97th edition, p. 1060)

2. All-rounder: A talented person who is excellent in all aspects within a certain range. (Modern Chinese Dictionary, 97th Edition, page 104) He requires extensive knowledge reserve and various skills. In short, he has the characteristics of comprehensive knowledge, diverse skills and strong ability to use and change.

3. Expertise: Expertise: Focus on one thing or one thing. (Modern Chinese Dictionary, 97th Edition, p. 1649) A professional refers to a person who has more professional knowledge and more skilled professional skills in a certain professional field.

4. Geng: adverb, which needs relative comparison.

5. Adaptability: Suitable for objective conditions or needs. (Modern Chinese Dictionary, 97th edition, page 1 157) From this point of view, it is a competitive environment suitable for contemporary society.

6. Social competition: Compare and weigh the advantages and disadvantages of extensive social communication.

Canoeing athletes 20:38:58

Professionals are more adaptable to the competition in modern society-refuting the view of the University of Technology. Thank you, Chairman. Hello! Socrates said, I would rather not speak than say illogical things. But today, other debaters tell us with their wonderful actions what it means to speak without logic.

First, the other party told us first that generalists have a broader vision than professionals. Then I don't understand why when it comes to generalists, they are open-minded and unconstrained, and when it comes to professionals, they are narrow-minded and rigid. What's wrong with professionals? There's an old saying in China: Go up a storey still higher, and you'll be poor for thousands of miles. Professionals who stand higher than generalists in a particular field will naturally see further!

Second, the other party said that modern society needs integration, all talents can be integrated but professionals can't, and all talents are more suitable for social competition. Then I don't understand. Why can't professionals fit in? The cooperation between professionals can make the integration more efficient and avoid the waste of social resources. Have you seen the cartoon Transformers? You are a hand, I am a foot, and together you are a big MAC!

Thirdly, the other side argues that the society is constantly changing and everyone can hold many different positions. Two questions. One, you said the generalist did a good job. Why did you change your job? Is it because you can't compete with professionals in that position The competition here is nothing more than the competition between suitable positions and professionals. How did it end? Second, does it mean strong competitiveness? Elephants in the circus can do arithmetic! Can elephants be competitive in mathematics? The neighbor's parrot can also say a few words about the other friend. Can I compare with you here?

Fourthly, another debater also talked about interdisciplinary subjects, and marginal subjects produced innovation. However, we say that innovation is not a simple game of one plus one equals three, and it is not the close contact between this discipline and that discipline that can generate inspiration! As we argued, innovation is closely related to doubt. Only by studying this major with great spirit can you know what innovation is needed, how to innovate and what to do after innovation. In short, innovation needs professional knowledge!

We have learned a lot, including all aspects of our business, and we can be considered a "generalist" when we finish learning, because knowing everything is a generalist? I don't think so. No matter what position you are engaged in in in the future, if you want to do a good job in this position, you must be accurate and expert. There will be opportunities for promotion in the future, and there will be opportunities to show your all-rounder.

In other words, even if you are a generalist, you can't call yourself a "talent" in a "major", and you will never be a generalist. Weapon 1: stick

Every inch of the stick can be attacked to achieve the effect of arbitrary and omnipotent. This can be compared with an all-rounder who is widely involved in various disciplines. Like Newton, he is also a physicist, mathematician and philosopher. Our exhibition president not only manages mathematics well, but also writes well. Our university is also advocating wide caliber, so that we can learn more subject knowledge. However, there are very few people who use sticks to the extreme in Wulin, and there are even fewer generalists in society at present. Although Japan has been calling for a crisis of all-round talent shortage, there is no way. For us, as the ancients said, "although it can't reach my heart."

Weapon 2: Sword

The sword wins with sharpness, which can be blown and broken, and cut iron like mud. Ordinary people can kill people with swords, but experts use swords.

It is even more overwhelming. Professionals are swordsmen. As long as there is a plan, there is capital for survival. And sophisticated.

Our talents are urgently needed by society. They are the leaders of the industry and the authority of the discipline, and one person can reach more than ten thousand people.

Yuan Longping can be tens of thousands of farmers! Qian Xuesen can reach tens of thousands of troops! But the sword is easy to break because it is not thick enough.

Weapon 3: Pioneer

The mountain opener is tough and sharp. The blade is tempered by a hundred folds of dark iron, which makes the back broad and tough and the blade sharp.

It extends on the back of a long, sharp and thick knife. This is the perfect combination of generalists and professionals. In the process of pursuing all-rounder, we constantly increase our own thickness and have professional places on the basis. The longer and sharper the blade, the greater the lethality; Only when the back is tough can the blade be strongly supported. The thicker the back, the longer the blade, the harder and sharper the back.

In contemporary society, "seeking knowledge" is more conducive to personal development. Hello everyone!

Our view is that in contemporary society, "seeking knowledge" is more conducive to personal development.

Before expounding our views, I want to explain some concepts in this debate. First of all, "contemporary society" is not only a concept of time, but also a concept of region, which is an environmental restriction on this topic and refers to the whole social environment in which we are currently located. Therefore, our debate is limited to this scope. Second, "seeking knowledge" and "seeking expertise" are two omitted concepts. The so-called "seeking knowledge" literally means "seeking erudition", that is to say, learning all kinds of professional knowledge extensively and becoming a knowledgeable person or a compound talent; The so-called "seeking specialization" corresponds to learning professional knowledge in a certain field and becoming a professional or professional talent. Third, "personal development" obviously includes the basic contents of study, work and life. In addition, the word "Geng" is very important. It shows that we are not arguing about which is beneficial to personal development, but which is more beneficial. What stands out is who has the advantage of promoting personal development.

Clear the concept, so as to enter the specific discussion.

First of all, I will discuss our views from the demand of social development for talents.

Personal development can never be separated from society, so when it comes to personal development, we can't avoid social development. What kind of situation is contemporary society? Let's have a look! Since the end of the 20th century, economic globalization and the rapid development of science and technology are changing the mode of production and lifestyle of human beings. Benign operation and sustainable development are the primary requirements of modern society; The social division of labor is finer and the requirements for integration are higher; Moreover, with the continuous progress of China's market economy and the deepening of industrial structure adjustment and professional structure adjustment, the flow of talents across industries and fields is becoming more and more frequent. Judging from this environment of contemporary society, what is needed more is talents with broad knowledge platform, rich knowledge reserves and diverse skills, which is what we often call compound talents.

To put it in more detail, first, a high degree of integration has become a prominent requirement of a highly divided modern society. Only by integrating the fragments of division of labor can we ensure the virtuous circle and sustainable development of society. And this kind of integration obviously needs compound talents with a wide range of knowledge-the process of integration needs communication and integration between different disciplines, so isn't the compound talents with a wide range of knowledge and multiple skills more advantageous than those who are only proficient in one professional skill and are more needed by society? ! Second, a realistic problem in contemporary society is the frequent flow of talents. Nowadays, more and more people are engaged in jobs with incomplete or totally inappropriate majors. After repeated employment attempts, more and more people finally choose stable jobs that have nothing to do with the majors they studied in that year. In the era of surplus talents, the job market is unpredictable, so in comparison, a person with a wide range of knowledge and many skills must have more employment advantages than a person who specializes in a certain skill. Third, the development of society puts forward higher requirements for individual's innovation ability, and in the case of the integration and infiltration of various disciplines in modern society, isn't a compound talent with thick foundation and wide caliber who covers all disciplines more innovative than a professional who is limited to one discipline?

For example, Microsoft now has first-class technical talents, first-class financial talents and first-class business talents. But when it was founded, they didn't have so many first-class talents, only Bill? 6? 1 Gates and Paul? 6? 1 Ellen, they all played the roles of technical talents, financial talents, business talents and even propaganda talents. It is their versatility that makes them successful.

Having said so much, it is nothing more than letting everyone understand that modern society needs a versatile talent and personal development must conform to the general trend of society. "Seeking knowledge" is of course an important way to become such talents. It can be seen that from the perspective of social needs, "seeking knowledge" is more conducive to personal development.

It should be pointed out that "seeking knowledge" does not require individuals to be all-rounders, but to acquire as many skills as possible to adapt to social development. One more skill is one more chance. Isn't that important to individuals? !

Secondly, from a personal point of view. Personal development includes three basic contents: study, work and life.

As far as learning is concerned, the education system in modern society is increasingly advocating all-round development. From primary school to university, teaching all subjects at the same time is to cultivate compound talents. It can't be ignored that due to the deficiency of the university system itself, a considerable number of university graduates are only compound talents in form. If you ask liberal arts students what "uniform motion" means, or ask science and engineering students to talk about Shakespeare and his plays, you may not get an accurate answer. Please don't say that they don't need to know these things. Obviously, these "partial experts" have entered the social division of labor, and they can't communicate with people in other industries at all. Without communication, their knowledge will be exhausted sooner or later. What about personal development? Why do you think we should learn English now? Yes, many people criticize our blind and crazy enthusiasm for learning foreign languages, but in fact, we often need to use foreign languages in our work. Can we just learn Chinese well? Isn't it more beneficial to learn one or more foreign languages on the basis of learning Chinese well? Isn't it more conducive to future work? Can't you make friends with some foreign people and cultures in your life and broaden your horizons? What's more, under the general trend of globalization, learning foreign languages is also the need of the times. Then, you should not only specialize in Chinese, but also be knowledgeable.

As far as work is concerned, no matter what occupation you are engaged in, it is impossible not to communicate with the outside world. In modern society, with the explosion of knowledge and various ways of information dissemination, if a person is still immersed in professional skills all day and does not balance his ability, he will be eliminated by society sooner or later. "Seeking knowledge" does not mean that a person should give up professional research and grasp his beard and eyebrows, but should have professional knowledge and skills and other abilities and accomplishments. For example, you may ask, the leadership of the new youth is composed of people with different abilities from top to bottom, including webmasters, CEOs and moderators of various forums. Isn't this the embodiment of "the profession has specialization"? Isn't it an important proof of "seeking specialization"? Yes, everyone does his or her job according to his or her own ability, but don't you see that the real job of each leader may have nothing to do with his or her position on the website of New Youth, and some people even have multiple jobs, such as Liu Rusi, who is responsible for the management of the whole literary department, focusing on managing literary forums, writers' columns and electronic monthly magazines! If you don't have comprehensive knowledge and skills, how can you be competent for these jobs? ! The same is true in reality. Only by "seeking knowledge" can we acquire all kinds of knowledge, ability and accomplishment, create more job opportunities for ourselves and adapt to the employment situation in contemporary society with frequent talent flow. So "seeking knowledge" is more conducive to personal development.

In terms of life, it is still relatively easy to understand. Is a person who knows some medical skills in life safer than a person who knows nothing about it? We don't need everyone to be a doctor, but wouldn't it be nice to know some basic medical skills and solve minor illnesses in time? It is said that personal development is based on health. Isn't it better for your health and personal development to know some medical skills? Of course, I just gave a concrete example. It is naturally better to know more about other common sense things such as diet, dress and etiquette-more conducive to life and work, that is, more conducive to personal development.

Well, I've said a lot, there's no need to say more. The above is enough to demonstrate our view that "seeking knowledge" is more conducive to personal development in contemporary society.

Finally, I want to end my speech with one sentence: "If you have a block, you can float across the river;" If you have ten or a hundred boards, you can cross the river by a bridge. If you have thousands of boards, you can build a boat to ride the wind and waves. "So, why don't we use all kinds of knowledge weapons to build a big ship? !

My speech is over! Thank you all. When it comes to the development of today's society, the opposing view still stays in the primitive society, emphasizing what is the division of labor. You know, with the rapid development of modern society, the requirements for personal talents have become higher and higher. People with only one skill are no longer needed by society. I also ask the other party to take a closer look at the recruitment market. If two people have the same skills and one of them has other skills, who do you think the boss will be more willing to hire? If the same salary is changed to all-rounder, I believe such people will be more competitive! Let's take a look at our college students. People with double degrees have broader space and development prospects in job hunting. In their spare time, college students are more willing to study things outside their major, such as English computer, and so on. They will know that only one skill is not enough. Real talents must be knowledgeable. If they only have one skill, they will not be able to adapt to the social changes of social development and will be eliminated more quickly.

In addition, the opposing party obviously lacks a certain understanding of China's academic system education. From undergraduate to master and then to doctor, this process seems to be more and more specialized and narrower, but that is only your personal cognition. In fact, there are many courses for master students and doctoral students. In addition to specialized courses, they have other courses to choose from, with the aim of cultivating more students with broad horizons, rather than nerds in their major. Look at the famous scholars in history. Who is not a knowledgeable person? Cao Xueqin, Qian Zhongshu, Lu Xun, Guo Moruo, Wu Guanzhong and Chen Yifei. They are all knowledgeable and knowledgeable people who integrate Chinese and foreign cultures. Because of their rich knowledge and broad vision, they have promoted their multifaceted and superhuman development in their careers. If Cao Xueqin doesn't know the pathology of folk allusions and prescriptions, then A Dream of Red Mansions will be greatly inferior. If Lu Xun is not a doctor, how can he describe the patient in detail? If Chen Yifei has a soft spot for architecture and sculpture, how can his architectural oil paintings paint beauty?

Therefore, we believe that seeking knowledge is the general trend of social trends and the requirement of individual all-round development. It is obviously incorrect and short-sighted for the opposing side to ignore all this. As early as hundreds of years ago, when many pedants were bent on becoming professionals, Zhuge Liang had already read the whole book, so let's take a look! I don't need to tell you which is the immortal, and everyone knows it very well. So "seeking knowledge" is more conducive to personal development. If this society is full of panacea, it will never seek development. "This sentence is too absolute. The social division of labor is becoming more and more detailed, which is a fact acknowledged by both the other party and us, but we should remember that it takes a cycle to train talents. Is it more welcome for the society to master all kinds of knowledge as soon as possible after the division of labor in the industry and quickly adapt to the work of new departments, or to adjust the knowledge structure and even learn professional knowledge from scratch after the new departments are derived? There is no doubt that he is a man with "universal oil" potential! In the field of education, especially in the field of basic education, "universal oil" is obviously more popular than simple "trauma ointment". The knowledge structure is never single. Chinese teachers should not only understand literature, but also have certain mathematical reasoning ability, historical macro-grasp ability and political logical thinking ability. Similarly, a kindergarten director hopes that she will recruit talents who are familiar with dance, music, painting, education and literature. As for the examples of Lu Xun and Cao Xueqin mentioned by the other party, although they all belong to "the profession has specialization", everyone knows that a writer can't write if his knowledge is narrow; Doctors should also know math and Chinese. Combining the above viewpoints, we believe that from a macro perspective, there are talents in all sectors of society, but from the actual and specific needs, it is even more necessary for a person to have a variety of knowledge and skills.

Extensive knowledge does not mean omnipotence, on the contrary, he has the conditions to achieve everything; In order to reach the top professional level in a certain aspect, he must first ensure that he has a broad knowledge base. The development of contemporary society is changing with each passing day, the requirements for talents are getting stricter and stricter, and the power of knowledge is getting more and more shocking! Based on the positive views contained in the above refutation, we firmly believe that in contemporary society, knowledge is more conducive to personal development!

The variability of modern society is one of the biggest characteristics, and the requirements for individual abilities in all aspects are gradually improving. How do the opposing defense experts adapt? The so-called women are afraid of marrying the wrong person, and men are afraid of entering the wrong line. Don't we have one more choice and one more opportunity to adapt to the development of modern society? Social division of labor is definitely not that one person can only do this, but that one person can do this as long as he has the ability. Or is it limited to his skills? Then, isn't seeking knowledge more suitable for the needs of society than seeking expertise?