Does the property have the right not to provide services without paying the property management fee?

There are a few questions. First of all, it is wrong to apply for a temporary residence permit issued by a property company. The property management company is just a company. He can't prove whether the owner lives in this community, and the certificate issued has no legal effect. Unless, the property company must bear the responsibility. The main strong proof to prove whether residents live in the local area is the neighborhood Committee or the police station. Of course, at present, some grass-roots governments are very confused, do not want to take responsibility or are afraid of trouble, and it is problematic to pass it on to property companies. There are many legal disputes caused by property companies issuing such certificates, and I hope that property peers can pay attention to them.

Secondly, property management companies should not stop their services because owners do not pay property management fees. If the owner fails to pay the management fee, the property management company shall collect it or contact the owners' committee for handling. It is wrong to stop the service. Unless there are special provisions in the contract.

Therefore, it is suggested that the landlord ask the neighborhood Committee to issue such a certificate, hoping that the landlord can pay the property management fee (as agreed in advance), otherwise it may bring trouble to your move.