What is the legal basis for the implementation of property tax in Chongqing and Shanghai? I mean: does the city government have the right to collect taxes like this?

The State Council executive meeting agreed that the law should stand aside first. Although 100% is illegal, the national court will not accept it because it is an illegal policy aimed at national taxation. In China, the policy is greater than the law, so we should understand the country. People must listen to the words of state officials to be harmonious.

Property tax can't restrain the rise of house prices, but it can stimulate and push up house prices because of the increase of costs. After the implementation of real estate tax in Shanghai and Chongqing, the price increase ranks first in the country, and the purpose of national tax can be successfully realized and implemented nationwide for a long time.

Huang: Mayor of Chongqing: "The purpose of implementing property tax is not to curb housing prices, but to improve the tax system for a long time."

Real estate tax reform pilot press conference, video:/p/finance/20110127/214761248283.html.

The government especially reminds the public that real estate is a semi-financial asset, which is related to inflation and monetary policy. The government has clearly told you that real estate will continue to rise for a long time.

Is the purpose of levying property tax by the government to crack down on real estate speculation? Real estate speculators buy today and sell tomorrow, but these speculators don't own real estate at all, so they don't need to pay property tax. Lang Xianping said: "The property tax is aimed at ordinary people who have held real estate for a long time. The only thing that the property tax can't hit is the real estate speculators that the government doesn't want to hit. "

We should learn from the Chongqing government, actively make up lessons, pay back the debts that should have been paid long ago to the people, and increase the supply of affordable housing (public rental housing). Therefore, the housing price in Chongqing is still the lowest among cities in the country, and it is calculated according to suites. Inflation and property tax factors will rise in the future, but at least the excessive rise in house prices will be curbed. What you can't learn from the Chongqing government is called shifting the burden. Chongqing only levies property tax on high-grade houses. Obviously, it is a policy to kill pigs and kill the rich to drive the rich out of Chongqing, but the people of Chongqing are never tired of it. This city is not suitable for rich people to invest, and the government has a serious mentality of killing the rich, but it is suitable for small business. When small enterprises become bigger, they must turn to other cities for development.

At present, the government has also formulated a policy to openly participate in real estate speculation, and the property tax is passed on to the rent. The government seems to be cracking down on people who have no room to live in and pay more rent to force ordinary people to pay for a house.

The property tax was finally passed on to renters, and the rent rose, which aggravated the emergence of a new round of investment in robbing houses. House prices continued to rise, taxes increased, and government goals were achieved. The transfer of property tax by the government can temporarily affect the contradiction between supply and demand and security. Levying property tax will make the country strong and prosperous, but for the sake of national interests, ordinary people have to sacrifice their personal interests.

After the implementation of the property tax, the government is most afraid that people who own houses will be more serious. They all go to the government to ask for money for land appreciation, or ordinary people go to the government to ask for their own land ownership. Then the government will be in big trouble, hehe.

Key point: it is very simple to solve the relationship between supply and demand. I don't know why the government deliberately made it particularly complicated! !

Because the government has not substantially solved the contradiction between supply and demand of affordable housing, every time the government introduces a policy regulation, it will increase the cost in disguise, and the higher it is, the people will pay the bill in the end. So it is bullish in the long run.

The government's new policy is to "curb the excessive rise in housing prices". The government requires that housing prices continue to rise, but not too fast. The decline in house prices does not conform to the new national policy. The New Deal originally didn't need a drop in house prices, but it needed a harmonious and moderate rise.

Example: Someone went to the market and bought a piglet for 100 RMB, and was adopted for 10 years. After 1 year, it grew into a big pig that can be sold for 100 RMB. A community organization tells you that you can't take 1 RMB from the value-added part of pigs, but you should collect 100 RMB from the value-added tax on pigs every year. This is the tax. In what form do you think it should be collected? Ha ha. The policy of mass organizations to suppress pigs is to clearly tell them to grab them, and not to buy pigs if they have the ability to see if the price of pigs will fall. But pigs are related to people's livelihood, and many people need to buy them to eat or raise them. If the organization solves the supply and demand of a large number of piglets and big pigs from the source, the problem will come! ! The question is whether community organizations are willing to do so. Instead of simply studying how to grab it next. Otherwise, once robbed, the cost of pig price will double.

The price increase is not the rise in house prices, but the depreciation of housing every year. The reason for the appreciation is the continuous appreciation of government land.

In foreign countries, land appreciation is subject to property tax (property tax and property tax, whatever the name is). Foreign land is owned by privatized owners, and their own land has increased in value. Foreign owners are very happy and of course willing to pay property tax. The China government is also preparing to levy a comprehensive property tax, but the problem is that houses are depreciating and falling in price every year. All the land in China is owned by the state, and ordinary people only have the right to lease. However, the land continues to increase in value, and the value-added part is also the value-added part of the country's land. The question is who should be taxed for the value-added part of the property tax? Does the local government require the central government to collect it? No Go to the people to collect it, but the people's houses are depreciating, but they have to be passed on to raise house prices, leading to an explosion in house prices.