Why can't liberal arts students find jobs?

"Well, I think my work is not productive, but cultural." Unfortunately, our society is not a university, nor is it a Renaissance medici family. They sponsored an artist to make a living. Modern enterprise system needs beautiful financial statements, favorable comments from shareholders' meetings and comfort from investors. In this way, those who are engaged in finance, sales, R&D and design can all come in handy for the boss and directly turn their labor into GDP and more and more money in their personal pockets. Of course, it is hard to say what percentage of profits they can get. But what do you want an enterprise to learn history for? Kant's pure and rational criticism seems unable to impress the judgment of the CSRC and let the company go public smoothly. As for being able to write a good hand and a good poem, thank you anyway. We are not a state-owned enterprise, so we don't need to run internal publications. In this way, every year when I graduate, all the liberal arts students who used to feel good about themselves are ashamed of themselves. If you are lucky enough to be a civil servant, if you are unlucky, you will throw away those poems, books, music classics and become a capitalist errand boy you despise. It is difficult for liberal arts students to find a job. At this time, isn't a group of so-called employment guidance experts active in our society? What did they say at first? It is difficult for liberal arts students to find a job because their mentality is not well adjusted, so they should find a direction corresponding to their major. Indeed, this statement is quite convincing, so liberal arts students began to despise their lofty ideals and unrealistic ideas, thinking that any humanistic spirit and preaching are bullshit, then cursing their professors, telling some useless things in class, and then regretting why they didn't choose such popular majors as civil engineering and programming. In fact, liberal arts students can't blame society. After all, it is unrealistic for all liberal arts students to go to school to teach. How many students are there in China and how many liberal arts students are there after the expansion of China University? It is impossible to set up publishing groups everywhere in China. After all, relative to the number of netizens, the number of bookworms probably belongs to at least the national second-class protected animals. What about museums and cultural institutions? Our country is still poor, and we really know manners. We're not there yet. What is more important now is to engage in economic construction and GDP. Since the society can't digest so many liberal arts students, why is it not clear when the university expands its enrollment? What's more, the university thinks that science and engineering can't be famous without millions of machines and equipment, but to establish a Chinese department or a law department, it is only necessary to recruit a few liberal arts students who can't find jobs to go public for mass production, which just solves some employment problems. Why not? As a result, our liberal arts students, like Mr. Smith in The Matrix, poured out in waves, and graduated from one of the total number of college students in China and directly became one of the total number of unemployed people in China. Everyone looked at the pathetic appearance of liberal arts students and felt that this was not the way. Men should be self-reliant. Liberal arts students should adjust their mentality. Don't complain about the low salary given by the boss, it's because you haven't created much material wealth at all. Don't expect to earn more money every day after graduating from college, but look at how much you have contributed to the people. Many liberal arts students themselves have clearly indicated their true intentions for the market economy. We should keep a correct attitude and accept social re-education as a blank sheet of paper. Whether society has patient education is another matter. However, is this situation happy? The sorrow of our society lies in the fact that our evaluation system and expectation for liberal arts students are the same. At first, Sartre's words were alarming. The work of liberal arts students should be literate. You can't judge its value according to how much return it directly creates. Perhaps in our society, it is difficult for liberal arts students to find jobs today because of the problems of policy makers, which is naturally a scar in the hearts of sensitive liberal arts students. But the bigger scar is that our society requires liberal arts students in the way of treating productive work, while ignoring the dignity and status of culture. However, it is a collective irresponsibility of society to turn to the psychological problems of liberal arts students for the sake of college students' employment. If a society can't provide a dignified way for the groups who create culture, it is a shame of society. If a society produces a large number of cultural talents, but treats them as productive talents, it is irresponsible to social groups and an insult to culture. This insult will further lead to society, including those who devoted themselves to Hegel and The Book of Songs, and further lead to the degradation of the cultural quality of the whole society. If you are a liberal arts student, you are working hard for your job. Then the purpose of my little article is to summon up your courage and raise your head. All the losses today are just because we live in the wrong era. Even if you are still trying to win an order for a passive customer in Nuo Nuo today, you should understand that the beauty in your heart is still noble.