In the reform of institutions, how should the participating institutions change?

There are three kinds of institutions that participate in public service: first, institutions and groups under the Party Committee participate in public service; second, administrative law enforcement institutions that participate in public service; and third, administrative institutions that participate in public service.

1. Subordinate institutions and party committees participate in public services. The participation of institutions affiliated to the Party Committee in public services refers to public service institutions that participate in the establishment of public services such as party schools and archives bureaus and participate in the management of public services. At present, the reform direction of party school is to maintain the status quo, and there is no new policy trend. The administrative power functions undertaken by the Archives Bureau are assigned to the Party Committee Office, and the Archives Bureau is listed in the Party Committee Office. Its public service function is undertaken by the Archives Bureau and still belongs to the sequence of institutions.

Group organizations refer to trade unions, women's federations, youth league committees, disabled persons' federations, Federation of Literary and Art Circles and Association for Science and Technology. At the grass-roots level, especially in counties and districts, due to the control of administrative establishment and the reduction of total control, workers and young women use less administrative establishment, and the Disabled Persons' Federation, the Federation of Literary and Art Circles and the Association for Science and Technology basically do not need administrative establishment. According to the reform trend of public institutions, group organizations will use administrative establishment and refer to the civil service law, just like party committees and organs.

2, the administrative law enforcement agencies to participate in the public. According to the Civil Service Law, administrative law enforcement functions can only be undertaken by cadres who are civil servants. In the new round of party and government organization reform, the focus of administrative law enforcement work is at the county level. A city divided into districts only keeps one administrative law enforcement unit. Generally speaking, urban law enforcement centers are integrated, and district administrative law enforcement centers are the main ones. Due to the control of the county administrative establishment, the administrative law enforcement agencies are mainly undertaken by the brigade or center, which is a public institution.

In the new round of party and government organization reform, it is clear to set up a comprehensive administrative law enforcement center at the county level, or to set up five industry law enforcement centers in agriculture, market, environmental protection, culture and resources. After the reform, administrative law enforcement units still use career establishment and remain in the sequence of institutions. Because the ruling law enforcement agencies are huge and involve a large number of law enforcement personnel, it is impossible to replace all administrative establishments by controlling and reducing administrative establishment and control problems. According to the pilot reform of administrative law enforcement in counties and districts of Liaoning Province, the comprehensive administrative law enforcement center is still a public institution, which cancels the attribute of taking part in official business and retains the identity and treatment of those who have already taken part in official business. However, the situation is not optimistic because the unit has not participated in public office and whether the personal identity has been retained for a long time.

3, administrative institutions to participate in the public. Institutions that fully or mainly undertake administrative power participate in public services. In the classification reform of public institutions, it is clearly required to completely abolish administrative institutions and transfer administrative power to organs. Before the new round of reform of party and government organizations, the institutions that undertake administrative functions in provinces, cities and counties have been reformed first, the institutions that fully undertake administrative functions have been abolished, the institutions that mainly or partially undertake administrative functions have been retained or integrated, and the administrative functions undertaken by the three types of units have all been assigned to the competent authorities according to their management authority. Similarly, due to the scarcity of administrative establishment, the total amount control is implemented, and all institutions that undertake administrative functions are placed under administrative organs in full accordance with the principle of "compilation follows things and people follow people", and the possibility of replacing them with administrative establishment is extremely small. Most of them will still be retained or diverted to other institutions, and after the transition period, they will cancel their participation status and become institutions.

20 18 the reform of public institutions swept across the country. According to different situations, it is implemented step by step in different ways, such as "changing enterprises, canceling, and tying the mouth". There are many units involved in important planning, so let's take a look with you now.

The establishment reform began in universities and public hospitals, and the number of workers has also decreased.

At the press conference held in Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, the relevant spokesperson said that among the more than 30 million people in public institutions, the education and medical systems account for the majority, and the education system accounts for about half. Due to the large number of participants, many posts in public welfare second-class institutions cannot be fully utilized, so the state finance should open up new sources and reduce expenditure, and refine and reduce the number of posts.

There is another post that needs to be reformed, and this post is the "logistics post". "Logistics posts" are also divided into supernumerary posts and supernumerary posts, but at present many posts are outsourced, also to streamline resources.

Public institutions are transformed into enterprises.

Some institutions, because their functions have disappeared or seriously weakened, or their assets are small, or they have no fixed assets, and they do not have market competitiveness, or it is difficult to operate normally after the transformation. According to the production and operation situation and development needs, it has adopted various forms such as wholly state-owned, mixed ownership and private ownership.

20 18 completed the bus reform ahead of schedule.

20 17 12 12 Hubei province pointed out at the work conference on bus reform and deployment of public institutions that Hubei province will begin to implement bus reform, starting with provincial institutions, and other units will imitate the methods of provincial units to carry out reform. The province's reform is expected to be basically completed by the end of March 20 18. The bus reform of public institutions has taken a key step, which provides an important reference for other provinces to carry out bus reform.

At present, the reform is being carried out in an orderly manner, which has a positive effect on improving political affairs, personnel management and separation of property rights, so the nationwide laying is also foreseeable. However, any reform is not achieved overnight and needs to be done step by step in practice.

Text: Hubei Zhonggong Society

The Civil Service Law does not apply to public institutions, which are not within the scope of this reform. The reform of public institutions promoted by the state mainly falls into three categories, namely, institutions with the nature of production and operation, institutions with administrative functions and institutions with the nature of public welfare. These three types of institutions apply the personnel management regulations of institutions, not the civil service law. By 2020, the reform of these three types of undertakings will be completed, that is, production and operation institutions will be directly transformed into enterprises, and institutions with administrative functions will either set up administrative institutions, or merge into administrative organs, or their functions and powers will be returned to administrative organs. After the functions and powers are returned to the administrative organs, people will generally exchange with other institutions, and finally retain institutions with social welfare nature, such as science, education, culture, health and other institutions. Institutions that are not conducive to the allocation of social capital must be retained, reflecting the purpose of pure public welfare, that is to say, after 202 1 year, institutions will be left with this category.

As for participating institutions, they are not included in this reform, because participating institutions can only participate in public services according to the authorization of national laws and regulations and the decision of the State Council and the CPC Central Committee, and they must be established according to law. The reason why the participating institutions are not civil servants' administrative establishment is because the total administrative establishment of civil servants is controlled and the number of posts is limited. Joining the administrative organs in the future is also a trend. Of course, it is necessary to modify the authorization of national laws and regulations in advance. This is another story. In short, the civil service law is currently being implemented.

The reform of public institutions seems to be an eternal topic, and new things appear every day. Five things that employees in public institutions must know.

1. Which institutions may be "fired" by their units in the future? Employees who have been "on leave" for a long time can be dismissed if they exceed 15 working days, or if they exceed 30 working days in 1 year, institutions can terminate their employment contracts. If the staff of a public institution fail to pass the annual assessment and do not agree to adjust their posts, or fail to pass the annual assessment for two consecutive years, the public institution may terminate the employment contract with a written notice 30 days in advance. If the staff of a public institution is dismissed, the employment contract shall be terminated.

2. With the implementation of the appointment system, will the staff of public institutions be swept away when they are older? No, employees who have worked for 10 years or more can apply for signing a "lifetime contract". For employees of public institutions who have worked for 10 years or more, the Regulations on Personnel Management of Public Institutions stipulates that they can apply for signing contracts until retirement. This contract will last for 1 1 year until retirement, which is beneficial for some researchers to concentrate on their research and work with peace of mind, regardless of what to do next after this employment period.

3. Will the welfare benefits of public institutions be cut? Welfare benefits will be tilted to the staff of grass-roots institutions. At present, the gap between different industries and different regions is relatively large. In the future, the gap in welfare treatment of public institutions will gradually narrow, and the reform will take into account remote areas, grassroots posts and grassroots institutions. In the future, these policies should be more inclined to the personnel of grass-roots institutions.

4. After the implementation of the Regulations on Personnel Management of Public Institutions, will the staff of public institutions get a salary increase? The salary level of staff in public institutions is influenced by market factors, and may rise or fall in the future, because it depends on the average social wage, prices and enterprises.

5. After the implementation of the Regulations on Personnel Management in Public Institutions, do retirees in public institutions need to pay endowment insurance? After the implementation of the regulations, on-the-job employees have to pay endowment insurance, and those who have retired do not have to pay it. According to the Regulations on Personnel Management of Public Institutions, from July 1 day, more than 30 million staff will begin to participate in social insurance.

Do retirees still need to pay social security? It is said that the payment of social security by personnel of public institutions can be implemented in accordance with the principle of old methods for the elderly and new methods for newcomers.

Before the promulgation of the "Regulations", according to the old method, it was not necessary to pay social security, which was conducive to stabilizing the treatment of retirees, and the pension subsidy should also consider the sharing of results. After the implementation of the Regulations, people will participate in social endowment insurance according to the new method.

20 18 public institutions have been carried out one after another throughout the country, basically in accordance with the standards of classification reform of public institutions. The author believes that the reform of public institutions is not like this, but it is still a civil servant. The reason for this is the following：

First, institutions are generally law enforcement agencies. In all institutions, administrative law enforcement agencies account for the vast majority, and these agencies undertake specific administrative functions. If it is changed into a general institution or pushed to the society, the administrative functions will fall on civil servants, and this part of the work may be unbearable. In this case, participation in public service will either remain unchanged or become a civil servant.

Second, the party school and other participating units were clearly changed to administration. In the central government's reform and deployment of public institutions, we can see that the party school will be transformed from the original public institutions into administrative institutions, that is to say, into civil servants.

Generally speaking, institutions don't have to worry too much about getting farther and farther away from civil servants, but I think they can only get closer and closer.

For more information about the reform of public institutions, please pay attention to the "East Ai Yu Public Examination" and answer your questions professionally.

If the topic is the theme, the participating institutions refer to the units managed by civil servants. In most places, when this establishment is transferred to the administrative department, it is directly transferred to the administrative establishment, and you can also enjoy the car subsidy in the car reform. According to the reform process of public institutions, these institutions are likely to be transformed into administrative units, and the personnel are administrative staff, that is, civil servants.

General institutions undertake or partially undertake administrative functions. The direction of reform is that administrative functions will be transferred to administrative organs, and institutions will only retain public welfare functions in the future, that is to say, there will be only public welfare institutions and no institutions in the future. Of course, there will be a long transition period, during which the identity and treatment of personnel will remain unchanged. It should be noted that the staff of public institutions are managed according to the Civil Service Law, and their job promotion and salary are exactly the same as those of civil servants. Personnel management of public institutions is not applicable to the Regulations on Personnel Management of Public Institutions.

Institutions authorized by laws and regulations are directly transferred to administrative law enforcement departments, and there will be no institutions in the future.

Some participating units are approved by the provincial government, and documents have to be sent to them. Those who participate in the government will turn to administration, and some will turn to public welfare.

In short, there is no gray area in the future reform of public institutions. Because there are many places in reality that are gray areas that have not been approved by higher authorities. Even if some people in the same business department take part in official business and some people don't, the leaders have the final say, which is very arbitrary.

The reform of public institutions cannot be achieved in one step, and it is necessary to wait for the above notice to issue documents, and those institutions that participated in the revolution will be merged into the administrative department. Therefore, it is impossible to reform in one step, and the superior has not issued a document to cancel the transfer to public welfare to maintain the status quo.

The reform and personnel adjustment of participating units vary from place to place. In some places, civil servants are directly registered by openly recruiting public employees, and the career establishment is treated differently. Part of the preparation of examination records is diverted to the preparation of public welfare undertakings. There are also some policies, such as the old way for the elderly and the new way for the new. Retired for nearly five years, do not change their identity, and keep their original identity. Young and excellent institutions have compiled direct exams. There are also some institutions that manage public affairs and keep their undertakings merged.

I hope my answer can help you.

Hello! I have been paying attention to this issue and have some thoughts to share with you:

Let's talk about the classification in the reform. Only when the classification is clear can we know the direction of reform. 20 1 1 central the State Council initiated the reform of the classification of public institutions, and based on their functions, they were divided into three categories to promote the reform, namely, administrative category, public welfare category (including public welfare category I and public welfare category II) and public institutions.

Second, let's talk about the classification in the daily organization and management of the preparation department. According to the form of capital supply, institutions are also divided into three categories: full supply, poor supply and self-supporting. However, institutions implement personnel system management, that is, all-supply institutions undertake public social management functions, and there is a clear legal and regulatory basis to undertake corresponding functions. The personnel department decided to refer to the civil service law, and the personnel of public institutions were registered as civil servants, and the treatment was exactly the same as that of civil servants of administrative organs. That is, full supply includes participation in the public.

Third, there are problems in the classification of reform and daily management because of their different foundations. I don't want to say anything else, just about the reform direction of participating institutions. There are two types of institutions participating in the reform, one is administrative and the other is public welfare.

Fourth, if the participating units are classified as administrative, they are either classified as administrative institutions or stripped of administrative functions and retain public welfare functions. Of course, if it is classified as an administrative agency, the employees will be adjusted to civil servants accordingly. However, limited by the administrative organization and the number of establishments, it is difficult.

Fifth, if the participating units are listed as public welfare, they must be listed as public welfare. Pure public welfare will not change, and personnel system reform will only change unless there is a big move. The second kind of public welfare is generally hospitals, vocational colleges and other units with income.

Generally speaking, the participating units will be relatively stable, and there is no need to worry about the direction of reform. If you are lucky, you will be included in the administrative category. If you have the opportunity to be included in the administrative organ, the development space will be better, but the treatment will remain unchanged.

1. It is actually an expedient measure in the reform to refer to the institutions managed by civil servants. For institutions that undertake administrative functions, we will implement "two breakthroughs", that is, the number of institutions is limited to the existing number, and the administrative establishment is limited to the existing total. Because the administrative establishment is controlled by the total amount, the institutions that undertake administrative functions cannot be immediately transformed into administrative organs or administrative institutions, but the ultimate goal of national reform is to implement the civil service system for institutions authorized by laws and regulations to undertake administrative functions. 2. The relevant documents on promoting the reform of public institutions point out: "On the basis of cleaning up the norms, the existing public institutions are divided into three categories according to their social functions: undertaking administrative functions, engaging in production and business activities and engaging in public welfare services. To undertake administrative functions, gradually transfer their administrative functions to administrative institutions or to administrative institutions; Engaged in production and business activities, and gradually transformed into enterprises; Those who are engaged in public welfare services will continue to remain in the sequence of public institutions and strengthen their public welfare attributes. " 3. In fact, what everyone is most concerned about in the reform of public institutions is the policy of institutional restructuring and personnel transition. 20 16 the two offices issued opinions on the reform of law enforcement agencies in the cultural market for reference. About the transition of personnel Anhui Province recently issued the "Implementation Measures for the Transitional Resettlement of Pilot Personnel in Institutions with Administrative Functions in Anhui Province". Anhui is a pilot province for the reform of public institutions. This method should have certain demonstration and guiding significance. Those who need complete documents can trust me privately.