The question about Savills.

I don't know if anyone, like me, unfortunately got the property service of Savills, a multinational property group. Savills does not provide services for owners, but tries its best to harm owners and infringe their interests.

I am the owner of Tianjin Binhai Zheshang Building. Usually park your car in the underground parking lot of Zheshang Building in Binhai, and pay the property parking fee of 500 yuan every month. Cars enter and leave with the magnetic card provided by the property. On 20 12, 10,122, the car stored in the underground parking lot was lost, and then the police were called, and the parking attendant was recorded by the criminal police, and the surveillance video was retrieved. It shows that at 2 am, the thief drove the car out of the parking lot. The thief stopped at the duty booth at the exit, then broke the railing and ran away. At this time, the personnel on duty in the parking lot in the booth did not stop, chase or call the police. It was not until this morning 10 that the car was lost and the police were called. The duty officer is still hiding it.

According to the staff of the property monitoring room, a few hours before the incident, someone in the parking lot adjusted the angle of the camera. It turns out that in the property monitoring room, you can see the license plate number of the vehicles entering and leaving and the driver's face. After adjustment, the monitoring room can only see the license plate numbers of vehicles entering and leaving, but can't see the driver's face. Just a few hours later, there was a car theft. Is it premeditated or coincidence?

Because the alarm in the parking lot was delayed and the best opportunity was delayed, the case has never been solved. Later, I went to Savills Property for many times to solve this matter. As a result, A pushed B and B and C, and the caliber was quite consistent, but it was impossible to stop the parking lot once. The leaders of the Property Service Center of Binhai Zheshang Building of Savills Property Company began to coordinate. And showed me the insurance policy of 250 parking spaces insured by Savills Property Consultant (Beijing) Co., Ltd. Tianjin Branch in China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. Beijing Chaoyang Branch, and the compensation ratio of the insurance company for the whole car being stolen and robbed. The insurance period is from 0: 00 on September 24th, 201year to September 24th, 201year. And asked me to prepare the materials according to the claim materials provided by them. After I submitted all the claim materials as required, the leader of Zheshang Building Property Service Center said that Savills Beijing Property Company had studied it. The responsibility for the lost car is the parking lot company outsourced by Savills Property Company, and the head office has instructed the parking lot to compensate for the losses.

And let the manager of the parking lot company contact me, thus starting a tug-of-war for nearly a year.

The manager of the parking lot company appeared once and disappeared. Every time he calls, he says that his boss is away and he has gone abroad, so he can't make compensation. Asked on the phone if he didn't want to pay compensation, he responded with a good attitude. We will definitely pay for it, but there is no money in the account now. When asked about the property, the property said that Savills has identified the responsibility as full responsibility for the parking lot and has instructed the parking lot to compensate. In this way, nearly a year has been wasted on such unnecessary wrangling.

It was not until I consulted a lawyer that I understood the sinister intention of stalling for time by arguing back and forth between Savills Property and the parking lot. The limitation of action for the loss of stored goods is one year, and it will be invalid if you don't sue in a few days. By calling China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. Beijing Chaoyang Branch, I heard that a manager of Zheshang Building Property Center had greeted the insurance company and reported the case orally, but failed to register in the system. On the other hand, the property center told us that the loss of the car is the full responsibility of the parking lot and should be compensated by the parking lot. Insurance compensation has nothing to do with the parking lot. I don't understand. My car was left in the parking lot insured by your property management company. You wouldn't let me go even if there were legitimate insurance claims, but you asked me to find a shell company without any strength to compensate. What are your concerns about Savills Property? If you are not going to claim compensation from the insurance company, your Savills Property will.

Did Savills Property Company become a listed company by accumulating these unscrupulous funds?

Strongly urge the relevant departments to stop Savills from infringing on the legitimate rights and interests of the owners.